Nineforty

Adams is questionable. Unless you have Valdes-Scantling as a backup plan, I'd sit em. That is currently my plan, starting Adams and picked up Valdes-Scantling if Adams can't go while sitting Bobby Woods and Tyler Boyd. It is risky as I'd prefer both those guys over Valdes-Scantling. But I feel good about the matchup so I am willing to take that risk. My three cents

Like your post. My friends love him and barstool. I love PMT. I have Much disdain for Portnoy and barstool though. So much so that I recently stopped listening to PMT out of principle. We will see if that lasts because I love those guys. Then I found $5.

I think I've read Mark Davis wasn't happy but he's the owner. if that is true, it starts with him. It is much easier for me to get angry at Gruden for some reason haha

I thought his finger or a couple of fingers were stuck in the face mask when watching the replay on game day.

44-38 bills

i read this yesterday.. I'm going to assume this is where they got it from: https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/29939438/2020-nfl-analytics-survey-which-teams-most-least-analytically-inclined

I like Ramsey. But here's to hoping we embarrass him and the Rams

do I start Robert Woods in fantasy? Would Tre shadow one of their WR's? I doubt it right?

I understood why we didn't resign him or why he didn't want to. Timing was off

I'm in the love camp and many noticed his talent. Always thought he was a gamer without a qb/offense. Not saying he is a true number one wr either. 1b or a 2.

why can't one be comfortable with the decision they made at the time they made the decision, and for the reasons they made it, at that given time? If I fold Q-J when A-K-2 is on the board, and a 10 comes on the river, I'm not mad that I folded.

I irrationally dislike #2 on your list. It's definitely a "me" problem I've noticed when talking to friends/fans.

As long as it wasn't mononucleosis

Enjoy and like the post. But I will choose as a fan to view this team as having no losing streak. New season. And you can hold me to that next year when things are reversed and we're riding a 19 game winning streak heading into 2021 season

Just wanted to thank those who paved the way and provided helpful info. Quick, pleasant call. ST Max free for season. A first in maybe 5 attempts over the years I believe.

We don't miss you. Any of you. And we can choose to beat your ass for riskin other people's health

2017- had Directv's Sunday Ticket 2018-2019- used Sling for redzone channel and Canceled directv because I know they auto renew 2019-Sling (sunday ticket didn't auto-renew. good) 2020-notices Sunday Ticket was auto-renewed! grrrrrrrrrrr click the 'X' button to cancel and get a message stating "Must call to deactivate".. double grrr

I find it more likely it is intentional. but maybe not. I just operate under the assumption they'll go with whatever makes more money.

had to find my login information just to chime in that this soflabillsfan1 is a tool. that is all. carry on.

You do understand the fact that Credico didn't want Stone jailed is irrelevant? You do understand what a reluctant witness is? You do understand that in that same letter (and the next paragraph of the article you copy/pasted), Credico writes, "I understand that Roger Stone has broken federal laws..." and then argues prison sentence would not be fair. You do understand nuances, such as the fact that Credico said he didn't believe Stone's threats, but also admitted that his threats to him and the judge could lead his acolytes (Proud Boys, crazy people on the internet, etc.) to do something harmful or violent. You do understand that the Judge said yesterday that Credico's grand jury testimony gave a different picture of his reaction to Stone's threats than when on the stand in the trial. Credico testified in to the grand jury that he no longer lived at his house after receiving Stone's threats and he also wore a disguise out of fear of being attacked by an ally of Stone? The judge also said she'd take Credico's more recent statements into consideration. Which is what she should do. And presumably did.

Volume I of Mueller Report stuff: Evidence of collusion (which is not a crime, I know) 1. Paul Manafort and Rick Gates (2016 Trump campaign manager/officials) were giving polling info to a Russian national that Gates thought was a "Spy" 2. Trump called on Russia to find Clinton's emails and ordered Flynn to find em. 3. Papadopoulos tried arranging meetings between Trump and Putin and Trump approved this work. 4. Don Jr created a meeting with the sole reason of obtaining Russian dirt on Clinton and Papadopoulos was offered similar stuff from a Russian agent. 5. Manafort meets with Konstantin Kilimnik repeatedly (connected to GRU). Kiliminik wanted to bring in person, a peace plan for Ukraine that even Manafort admitted to Mueller's team that it was a backdoor way for Russia to get Crimea. There is so so so much more but I realized it's not worth going through 20 more bullet points.

Mueller took it as a mandate. And maybe we'll find out Barr forced this view on him. I doubt it. I bet Mueller believes in the import of the memo's philosophy. It's somewhat comical to me that we are on the opposite sides of this, and you're saying IT'S NOT A MANDATE, when leading up to Mueller's issuance of the report, I was hoping beyond hope that that is what he would believe. You just think it's part of some conspiracy that Robert Mueller is a part of to fool "low information" people like me. Gotcha.

Yes? It's a quality site. You should try it sometime. It actually has conservative and liberal voices. To understand, it would require you to make some effort in understanding the OLC memo and it's history and relevance to this. I believe a traitor such as Trump It's not that hard to find a Foxnews.com article with Robert Mueller's quote that I was using from Vox.

Let me be blunt. I want Trump to hang. But I also understand the argument that a sitting president cannot be indicted. Ever. And I would welcome that debate after Trump.

https://www.lawfareblog.com/mueller-bound-olcs-memos-presidential-immunity I know a lot about this memo and it's impact. But don't take my word for it, take it straight from congressional testimony of Mueller, "We, at the outset, determined that, when it came to the president’s culpability, we needed to go forward only after taking into account the OLC opinion that indicated that a sitting president cannot be indicted,” he said.