bills11

Agreed

I don't know what Gettleman is doing . Daniel Jones would probably have been available for them way later on screams like a huge reach. Nothing really stands out about this guy other than his links to the Manning's

That's the going rate for elite qb play ..Wilson is an outstanding qb the o-line last couple years has been terrible yet he put up 35 TDs 7 int last year

It was over for KB before it started he came into the NFL thinking he was a superstar because of his rock star status at fsu natl champ winning catch ..he was at best a number 2 ..Panthers offence was consistently better without him . That being said some team will give him a shot..he's super slow for a wr and doesn't get separation if I was him I'd switch to tight end and eat linebackers but ego .

She fits in with what they are looking for at NFL network...they want a variety of different things. Like the fantasy show is not run by football experts either..she has a different type of approach which is what they want. If they wanted to be super serious they wouldn't have michael irving and deion doing coverage .

the more the merrier competition is never bad you never know when a player you can bring in can be great on special teams or etc

Completely agree the jags and Bucs uniforms are an abomination this new jets one looks like a arena league or CFL uniform

to me it looks too similar to the cfl Saskatchewan team or the eagles kelly green uniforms

Rodgers is definetely arrogant anyone can see that..he's much more Kobe than dirk Nowitzki . At the same time though..the Packers have wasted nearly his entire career with archaic policy's like Thompson's free agent aversion and mcarthys in game blunders . They could have easily got Marshawn Lynch his college teamate from Buffalo which would have taken them to another level on offence etc ...the Patriots work because Belichick might be a huge jerk but his coaching is brilliant so it erases whatever flaws are in him and toms relationship.

That wont make a significant difference unfortunately...the patriots offence is practically robotic its predicated on an entire roster of short shifty players who get open aslong as bradys internal clock is okay they will keep chugging along...they will just keep finding edelman/welker clones. they always appear to struggle early then they tighten up like a well oiled machine.

DK just the video says can definitely be successful in the right system and with the right Quarterback. My comparison for him is Dez bryant but he is more explosive. Dez was never a Good route runner..but was able to be productive catching jump balls slants and deep passes but it takes a Seasoned qb to be able to get production out of those type of players often times they wont have much separation but will still be open given their catch radius and body position. Its why Dak struggled throwing him the ball and why his preferred option was beasley or witten...Romo was obviously more seasoned and more able to understand the nuances of passing.

well to be fair the eagles have barely any cap space..and they have wentz huge contract coming up

WOAH

While Antonio's brown mouth isn't Doing himself any favours ..at the same time he does have a point on certain things .. Roethlisberger is a terrible leader who's clashed with multiple coaches and players ..some of the leaders from when he was a younger qb like Hines Ward don't feel too highly of him . You don't call out your teammates publically as a leader that's behind closed doors..atleast on that level I sympathize with him other than that he's an idiot for some of things he says

yeah i agree with that..you can get a feel from certain teams that they are mentally defeated before playing the pats and some who arent scared at all..that year rex jets beat them they were not intimidated at all

Theres always going to be a weakness on your defence and offense in the salary cap era..and there is always different ways of masking those weaknesses..this is prolly one of the weakest incarnations of the pats offence...gronk is past his prime...edelman is not getting younger and they have no outside threat...the point im saying i feel imo they could have done more..no ones gonna stop the pats offence but they could have done more to slow them down.. there are things you can do the reason why brady was getting the ball out so fast in the chargers game was the wrs were getting free releases...in the chiefs game brady had to hold the ball much longer because the chiefs pressed them at the line..their problem was not being able to cover the pats inside routes..and not having cohesive pressure packages. Half the battle of beating the patriots is mental the giants defence that beat them twice in the superbowl had weaknesses all over the place.

There are still different ways to scheme around your weaknesses...that same broncos defence wade coached up got torched the year before when del rio was calling plays. the chargers have tons of talent on defence and especially on the d line a more creative mind could have come up with pressure packages and stunts that would disrupt the patriots timing based throws..the pats did exactly that to the chiefs they doubled hill and had their d line stunt and loop and create favorable matchups against the chiefs oline..the pats o line isn't the best in the entire league they can be pressured the bottom line is theres enough film out there that has shown what it takes to disrupt the pats offence...sitting back in zone will never beat them..if bradys able to just set up take his drop and have nothing around his feet all day hes gonna carve up your defence. weve seen that same scenario play out for our very own bills..week 1 and 2 got absolutely demolished by the ravens and chargers where we sat back in our cover 3 shell and just played passively until mcdermott took over the play calling briefly and we started using much more blitz packages and pressure oriented schematics the rest of the year.

The only problem is thats gonna lead to fans 2nd guessing the replay reversals..theres gonna be plays like where receiver db feet tangle or both are tugging each other..and they call pi on the defence in a big moment or etc

Yeah i understand that but there has been coordinators who have put together cohesive gameplans vs the patriots..the ravens have done it time and time again..so has defenses run by wade the pats have weaknesses you can attack as well..if you sit back in zone like the chargers did you have no shot so gus bradley is not absolved of any blame there..Bob sutton took way too long to adjust to the patriots run heavy approach where the pats went on marathon drives..which resulted in touchdowns anyways. He should not have waited till after halftime to change his approach.

Well thats not surprising a defense that could get sacks and nothing else...pats were so fortunate to face two defensive coordinatoors in consecutive weeks with trashbin gameplans

Another bill Belichick masterpiece I see people saying sometimes oh he's lucky he has Brady. I'm certain it's the other way around the guy is just different .

Chan was a very innovative play caller from actually making Kordell Stewart look competent in Pittsburgh to making Fitz look like a franchise qb albeit for a few weeks ..his downfall though was his loyalty to these average players obviously he had a big hand in Fitz premature extension in buffalo ..and he never really seemed to have an overwhelming desire to work with an elite signal caller when he got to the Jets he brought in Fitzy asap

The only thing for certain is Gus Bradley's gameplan was horrendous. The chargers essentially sat back in zone all game which resulted in Brady being as comfortable in the pocket as I've seen him since 2007 . If you're going to sit back against Brady the coverage better perfect or your d line better be able to generate pressure neither happened hence the blowout . despite chargers having plenty of talent ..gameplan reminded me of the bills 1st game vs Ravens and 1st half vs chargers before McDermott took over the playcalling sitting back in cover 2/3 no pressure getting picked apart by flacco and rivers clearly bills weren't 40 pts worse than ravens.

I don't disagree I'd say they do have more talent overall

Correct . The correlation with 99% of teams who have beaten the Pat's is physicality toughness and dominant pass rushers and very good to excellent coverage on the back end