DabillsDaBillsDaBills

This is where I'm at. His last season here it looked like he was responsible for at least 5 interceptions. I don't want him back, but my money would be on Beane re-signing him. Beane LOVES bringing back players that he's familiar with

In what world have his hands been excellent? In this last year he had a BRUTAL drop on that 4th down in the playoffs and an abysmal 58% catch rate in the regular season.

Bills Raiders 2011 week 2 We were down 21-3 at halftime and ended up winning 38-35. One of Fitzmagic's best games

I'll go on a fact checking mission. 1st loss Chiefs had 9 possessions 5 TDs 1 FG 1 Punt 2 end of half 2nd loss Chiefs had 11 possessions 5 TDs 3 FGs 1 missed FG 2 Punts 3rd loss Chiefs had 9 possessions 3 TDs 2 FGs 1 Punt 1 Fumble 2 end of half 4th loss Chiefs had 10 possessions 4 TDs 1 FG 2 Punts 1 Fumble 2 end of half By my count that's only 8 stops by the Bills DEF and not 9 showing in the screenshot. Maybe they are counting the missed FG in game 2 as a defensive stop, or the muffed punt that we recovered in the 1st game. Those are both ST plays so I don't think they should count as DEF stops. I'm not counting any 'end of half' possession as a stop since those were all kneel-downs. In the SB on the Chiefs first 9 drives they had 6 punts, 2 INTs, and a failed 4th down.

There's plenty of owners willing to spend cash to kick cap hits down the road. Most don't get the same results that the Eagles do. The Browns (lol) led the league in cash spending last season. The Eagles have that loaded roster from hitting on a lot of recent draft picks, fleecing a few teams in trades, and not handing out bad contracts. There's nothing unusual or special about how much cash Lurie is spending on the team.

Going the draft rout was not the problem for the Chiefs, they struggled offensively after Mahomes torpedoed Rashee Rice's knee. Imagine how bad our offense would've looked last year if Shakir went on IR in week 4. We had a taste of that in the Texans and Ravens games that he was injured for. Proven talent through FA doesn't always work either. We gave Samuel a decent chunk of change and he was a non-factor (hopefully he'll be better this year when healthy).

We didn't though. The Lions scored more than us in the regular season. The Eagles and Commanders scored more in the post season. Combining regular and post season stats together is dumb.

Chiefs didn't have WR1 Rashee Rice in either game against us

Rasul Douglas and Jordan Poyer are still available

I could not hate this signing more. I don't care if it's vet minimum + incentives to reach this "up to" 6.8m. We cut him and ate dead cap TWO YEARS AGO because he was 100% cooked after (unfortunate) injuries. He was atrocious (borderline worst CB in the league) for the Rams last year before they benched him. They ultimately traded him to the Ravens for a 7th round pick swap. Essentially the lowest possible value you could trade a player for. He was awful for the Ravens (although he did slightly improve from worst CB in the league). This is reminiscent of bringing back Beasley/Brown in 2022, or AJ Klein in 2023, or Micah Hyde in 2024 because we're familiar with those guys. Re-signing guys who are 1000% cooked just because we're familiar with them is terrible roster building.

I'm honestly in shock that Chad Pennington received MVP votes. 2008 was a massive down year

I don't think he's worth a roster spot even at a vet minimum contract. I'd rather take a chance on an unproven guy than give it to an aging vet that looked as cooked as Douglas did last season.

Are you a lawyer? To me, as a layperson, it seems like there's enough grey area this would be a tough lawsuit to win. Especially when you consider McAfee has the resources to buy the best defense attorneys. This reminds me of when McAfee was sued by Brett Favre for defamation. Favre withdrew the lawsuit with no settlement after McAfee clarified a few things. I guess that case is a bit different since Favre is a public figure and this girl is not. For this case I could see McAfee throwing some settlement $$ her way, but I'd be surprised if he loses the lawsuit.

I've never listened to McAfee and never will, but I'm not clear on the legal merits of this case. He never used her name and tossed out some "allegedly's". The guy is allowed to reference a rumor on his show. The actual bad people in this story are whoever started the rumor, and anyone harassing/threatening this girl and her family. Those are the people that should be facing legal repercussions. They don't have deep pockets though so this girl and her attorney are not interested in them.

For the replay-assist does roughing the passer fall under the hits to defenseless players category? Overall I could see this detracting from the viewing experience. Refs will be conditioned to throw a flag on anything that remotely looks like one of these penalties and just have it go to review. It's better for the ref to have it go to review and get it right than to risk not throwing a flag and getting it wrong. Similar to how they've been conditioned to never blow a play dead if there's any chance there was a fumble.