ghostwriter

Quality moves.

Yes please. He is not a bad QB overall, just a bad starter. Quality backup who can start a few games and not lose them for you, I'd love to have him.

I'd rather start 5 INTs Nathan Peterman over a rookie, that's just me. I'd prefer to give the kid time (whoever that may be).

How I define it? Start Derek freaking Anderson for 6 games if you have to!

Who cares what the definition is of a bridge QB? The end result is the same. Sit the rookie on the bench until the game slows down. How you want to describe that or define that, I don't care. As long as we don't feed our franchise QB to the wolves, I'm cool with whatever you want to call it.

I really appreciate it guys! Hopefully one of you can get your hands on Star Lotulelei's contract numbers!

I'd trade a 1st and 2nd for Luck, but nothing more than that, too risky, but you also have to take into consideration that trading up to 2-3 is also very risky so the risks are about even.

He probably knew that literally no free agent QB wants to go to the Cleveland Browns. Taylor is one of the few high character guys that wouldn't throw a stink if he wound up in Cleveland. I think it's a fair trade.

Dorsey is a real good GM, I highly respect him. I think the Browns may actually turn it around, I'm really pulling for them, their fans and city deserve it. The guy has made good move after good move. Taylor, Landry and now Hyde? I think they do much better this year.

I think the Bills love Rosen. If we do trade up, I think he's the guy. Just speculating though of course.

I want: 1.) Trevor Siemian 2.) AJ McCarron 3.) Tom Savage In that order.

It likely means Josh Allen isn't in the mix as well. Most people think he is a project and needs time to sit, same goes for Sam Darnold. Most likely down between Rosen and Mayfield IMO.

All signs point to a trade up, wouldn't surprise me if a deal was already in place. No way we don't go after a QB if we aren't sure we can draft one of the top 2-3. This also means that they think their guy can start right away. Just speculating of course.

5 million is pretty much the norm for average DTs, the elite ones command around 15. Kyle is on his last leg and he is getting 6. Once again, I'd be very surprised if he doesn't command between 8 and 9. We're signing him to be the centerpiece of our defense.

Maybe, I don't have a crystal ball or anything, I'm just trying to think from his perspective. Why box yourself into a 5 year deal if you're not being compensated well? I'm pretty sure it'll be over 7, I could see 8, but I think you're right that it's probably not 10.

May not get 10, but why sign a 5 year deal if you're getting chump change? He is definitely getting paid more than KW and he got 6.

I could live with that. Cool. If he is coming for 'peanuts', I hope it's a 2 year deal, he has some upside.

He'll be out of the league in 2 years.

I think your blood sugar is getting low.

Getting a WR to come here is a tough sell, Nathan Peterman is the only QB on our roster.

That's exactly my point, there was a market for him! Fans suggesting he got between 5-7 is highly unlikely, he probably would have taken a 1-2 year prove it deal if that were the case. He probably got between 8-10.

Josh McCown or Tom Savage for me, draft Mayfield/Darnold/Rosen and be done with it.

Josh McCown bounced around too, Kyle Orton etc. Tons of examples of that happening. Just because a player struggled in the past, it doesn't mean that they're never going to improve, especially at the QB position. And he was benched for Deshaun Watson, who is not your typical rookie. We need a backup, not a starter, use the 20 million Bradford got and sign 4-5 meat and potatoes players.

On spotrac it says he is an UFA, I could be wrong though. I loved him in college, he would be great in spot duty for 2-3 games, good enough to hold down the fort and keep us in it. Case Keenum was a journeyman too until he blew up in Minnesota.