gobills1212

Point blank, this is obv OT but is it bc the other board was shut? There was some good stuff on occasion there but this was far and away more informative and a better read. I'm not straight up blaming the influx as why the change has happened bc I don't know... but was it that? Was making the playoffs marking an up tick of people who wanted to discuss the team? Did board rules become less stringent where these posts wld just be merged before? It's not fair to say what it is when I don't know myself but the some or depending on time of year, most, of the posts act like it's a new discussion or an arm chair pov that hasn't had any research prior to posting are mind boggling. Its not fair also to lump all transplants in that group, but it was such an influx that i think it tends to. Many have brought great game with them and shoukd be/are respected.As I maintain, there is great stuff and great posts but now it needs to be sifted through. There didnt seem to be as much stuff that you are shocked someone actually attaches their name to.

Think about how much time went into writing it, and then how much time was taken up by all the people who read it. Damn shame, that time could have been spent arguing if it's smart to trade up or what FA qb is the best? Heck, it could have even been spent debating if our punter lost us the JAX game!!

There have been some real doozies today but this fanatics 'leak' might take the cake

Right, but when the thread is self aware it's at least different. Its the posts like this that are serious that scare/amaze me

Well, finally someone didn't get it. Mrbojangles - here's to you!

I see what you did there....and I like it!!

Yes, see, but it's funny bc that's the idea. You see, this is a form of mockery. The irony of starting a crappy thread making fun of crappy threads is funny to those annoyed by said crappy threads. Thank God for humor-am I right??

I find it funny after reading the Foles thread my 1st thought was the Foles for tre and a pick and how thatd lessen the blow if them trading white:)

Proving once again that even a broken clock is right 3 times a day!

Spot on my good man!....spot...on...

Lol, I'm just waiting for the 1st person who's head this goes over and this is where this thread goes for real haha

Which, around here seems to be always right and pretty much the same thing as facts!

I just don't understand how it can even be argued any other way. Now that Tyrod is gone, the #1 argument is they have SO MANY HOLES to fill and trading away the picks don't allow for them to be filled. But the opposite is..... getting a FA guy drafting to fill holes... and then rather than filling holes w next yrs 90 mill in cap space - THEN we go try and buy a QB? Seems a little all too familiar. IF you love a guy, go get him. Let him learn this yr and go fill holes next year. Maybe it just makes too much sense... Maybe people are afraid of change? Either way, this argument scares the heck outta me...

Sorry, I forgot to provide all the info that the Colts are at 3 and the obligatory option B of trading for luck. My bad

If ya can't beat em - join em! Has anyone ever considered a move to #3?? I invite you to reply below.

Good read, thanks!

Man, I wish Sal posted here. Seems like a great guy who gets it. Not that he's always right or anything but I always seem to dig or agree w where his head is at. This is no exception. Thanks for the post Yolo!

Its pretty clear there are two factions here in regard to how the draft is run. This has been established and discussed and will continue to be.... Yay

Bc we don't know what the field is yet.... unless this is just an exercise and another tell everyone who you want their qb to be thread- how can anyone make a pick/argument when no one can see their actual choices???

Good grief! Can we draft a guy 1st? How can this be answered before then?

Thread is like a bad movie. It starts out ok and you think they might be on to something and it will hold your attention.... only to have the ending be bad and confusing which makes it a complete waste of time.

1000000% agree. Hit the nail on it's proverbial head

Uuhhh, what? Who cares? He's not a member of this team any more and accordingly is no longer their problem. Bygones being bygones

Could they though? One was a trade up to get in the party and the other was essentially bc they decided they needed to draft a qb. When you can trade down and still get the 1st qb off the board it's not exactly awe inspiring. Kirby summed it up pretty well w his thoughts imo

Figured it was only appropriate to say goodbye to a topic that's taken up so much of my time over the past couple years. Can't say I'll miss it and I'm sure soon enough there will be a replacement - but until then....WHEW!!