Buffalo03

So, we lost the first Jets game because we aren't talented enough, even though we killed them the second time? I think the London trip playing a Jags team that had already been in London for 2 weeks played a big part in that loss, we lost the first Patriots game because of coaching, we lost the Eagles game because of coaching. We didn't Los because lack of talent. This team is capable of blowing anyone out on any given week if we played the way we should and I think you know that. But because of scheme and injuries, we haven't.

This team is talented to have won every game we have played in. Again, tell me where I am wrong in my assessment. Do we not have a top 3 or 4 QB in the whole league? Do we not have a good/decent RB, do we not have the best oline we have had in years? Do we not have an up and coming TE? Do we not have a top 10 defense without our best players? Tell me where I am wrong

And please state reasons why. How do you think I'm overestimating the talent. Do you even know? Or do you disagree just to disagree?

In what ways? The guy that originally posted this said that 13 or 14 would be overachieving but that 10 would be under achieving. Are we really gonna argue about a difference of 2 or 3 games? This team can win 11 and it can certainly win 14. It just doesn't because of bad coaching and game management earlier in the season. All 6 losses are by one score and could have gone either way. We have a top 3 QB, a good RB, a good up and coming TE, a solid Oline and pretty much a solid defense with missing core players I may add. Keep that in mind. We are missing Milano and Tre and have still won 10 games. The only thing we really need help at is WR. Tell me how I'm wrong

I think you're underestimating the roster. I think we are talented enough to win 13 or 14 games but haven't because of stupid decisions made. Not because of talent

Well, all 6 of our losses are one score games so certainly could have been possible

I feel he has been better with this in the last month. Have you seen something where you wouldn't agree?

Better in game management. He hasn't been perfect but better. He always seems to get the best out of his players when he needs it

I feel overall, his game management has been a lot better in this 4 game win streak. It hasn't been perfect but it's been better

What guy?

I miss the Beasley underneath roll. That's when our offense was clicking

So, if we go 3 and out on offense right off the bat or we let the Dolphins go down the field on their first drive and score, we should just pack our sh*t and leave? Has someone notified McDermott of this?

Going to Miami Gotta get a win I farted

I'm starting to think schemes are a major problem. When Brady was new it threw teams off a bit but now they are already catching up to it because the last 2 weeks were no different from anything that Dorsey has done

Ok. And?

And we got him in the 3rd round when Beane usually makes his "who the f*ck is this guy?" picks

Tua got hurt when they were down 42-19 in the 4th quarter. Chubb went down with 3:00 minutes left down 49-19. I feel bad for the players but the Dolphins were idiots for keeping them in there that long

We gotta get in first

True but man, if only we clinched today

If they play Saturday, we could be sweating out Sunday. That would suck

Yes there is. Kinda like how a lot more people have beaten Belichick throughout his career when Brady wasn't his QB

McDermott started 0-6 vs Belichick (Ironically when Belichick had Brady). Since then McDermott is 7-2 against him and one of those 2 losses was in a tornado

I'm thinking we get Saturday night against the Dolphins next week and Sunday night will be Texans at Colts

F*cking Seahawks. Idiots going for an onside with 2 mins left

The thing we have to worry about now is the Chiefs already have nothing to play for. The Raiders loss today means they lost the division and the Chiefs have already clinched and just playing for seeding