Buffalo03

The difference between now and that 96 team was that was the scrap heap of what was left of the Super Bowl years. It was Kelly's final game on the downside of his career. Thurman on the downside of his career. Cornelius Bennett left the off-season before. It was a team holding on. This team is ways away better than that team was. I'm not saying the Broncos can't win. They absolutely could and that is something I don't wanna think about. But that 96 team was much worse than what this team is

I'm sorry I mean "the chance" of winning multiple Super Bowls

Yeah, but me personally, I would rather win 3 Super Bowls ac an OC somewhere than go to a dumpster fire franchise to be a HC. But that's just me

The problem is, some coaches don't care about the "great thing they have" and winning championships. They want to be HCs and take crap jobs just to take it. I hope Brady doesn't do that but generally, I honestly don't think most coordinators care about how much success they have. They wanna coach

If teams are in the playoffs, don't interview their candidates. I'm sick of this

Daboll also had success his first year and got Daniel Jones to have a decent year and got to the playoffs. That is the only reason he is still there. If he had missed the playoffs his first year as well, he most likely would have been axed today to

Imagine how bad this board would have blown up if we got the Amazon Prime game

Yeah, send Pittsburgh into Kansas City. That should scare them

Well, come on, what is it? The suspense is killing me

Who thought Commanders at Bucs was a good idea for Sunday night?🤮

The team with the better record should get the home game. They earned it. Winning a division with a 9-8 or 10-7 record didn't deserve it as much. So, an 8-9 division winner should be home over a 13-4 second place team in their division? You realize that the Vikings or Lions with 14 wins will have to travel to play possibly 2 or 3 games in the playoffs depending on how far they get and if they play 3, 2 of them will be against teams with worse records than them. Yep, you're right. Very fair lol

Just because they beat the Vikings does not mean they deserve the higher seed of the 2 in the playoffs if they have 3 less wins lol. Do you remember when the Saints who went 12-4 back in 2010 had to travel to Seattle in a hostile environment to play a 7-9 division winning Seahawks team? That was long before the extra playoff teams. In no way, should the Seahawks had been the home team. Again, if you guarantee a division winner a playoff spot then the division still means something. You don't have to get a home game to have it mean something. It is flawed. No team with 4 more wins in a better division should have to travel to play a team that won a worse division. It's just wrong

It was a problem before those 2 extra playoff teams. It always had been. I don't know how you can think it's fine. It's not. If the someone else in our division went 14-3 right now and we went 13-4 and had to travel to play the 10-7 Texans as the 5 seed next week, you're ok with that? No one should be

They can set it up to where if you win your division that you are still guaranteed a playoff spot so it will still mean something. But under no circumstance should a 14 win team that just happens to have another 14 or 15 win team in their division have to travel to play a 10 win team that won a crappier division. The system is flawed and needs to be changed

Even if we get blown out next week. McDermott will be here next season

By throwing more passes

Exactly. In one whole quarter pretty much. They needed to see how he handled 5 passes? Lol

Yeah, but he wasn't throwing lol

What was the point of putting Mike White in the game?

MVP sealing performance for Josh

The dude had everything in Buffalo and couldn't figure it out. As bad of a situation he had with the Browns, it's kinda hard to give him the benefit of the doubt

I think a 1 and a couple of other picks is what it would take. He is a player you give up a 1 for. He is still young enough for that. I wouldn't give up a 1 to get him at 33 but at 29/30. I definitely still would

The Patriots were like 14 point underdogs going into that game which tells you what Vegas thought about the matchup. and the fact they have been busted cheating numerous times would make one think it was entirely possible that the Patriots knew what they were doing

Honestly, from what I have seen of their careers, I like Mike White better than Trubisky anyway. I don't recall seeing him play for the Dolphins but every time I watched him with the Jets he was actually pretty decent. While Trubisky has been bad more often than good. And often his "good" is mediocre

And the stakes are really high this Sunday. Even higher than next week when he will most likely play. But if he can't handle this Sunday's high stakes matchup, cut him Monday