Buffalo03

If there is a game changing defensive player for them? absolutely. Their defense was horrendous last year and needs to be fixed badly. If a player they would really like drops, why wouldn't they?

I have said if we could work something out with the Falcons on draft day where we move down to their spot at 14 and then maybe get a late round pick back. It would be something I would do. It would probably require us throwing in a 2nd round pick this year and maybe a 3rd next year as well which I would also do. I wouldn't give up a 1st this year for Julio but if the Falcons were willing to move up to 9 to get a particular player, I wouldn't be against swaping picks with them and still aquiring Julio

I like the signing. I'm just afraid he's gonna break his wrist while sleeping tonight

I love this rule. I actually made a post about it a few days ago and people lost their minds.

You're looking too much into it. Teams have 2 score leads for majority of the game all the time and then blow them in the final 3 or 4 minutes. How is this any different? Stop the team from scoring and you won't have that problem

Comparing eliminating an onside kick to tackling? I have no words for this

Yeah, no removing the kickoff would be extremely stupid. I would not watch the NFL anymore if they did that

I have plenty of experience of watching football. Have been since I was 5. I'm now 33. And the rule I'm proposing is not the same as what was proposed in the arricle posted above and it is a better option than the onside kick the way it is now

What I'm referring to is not like what is being described in this article. The article makes it sound as though the scoring team automatically gets the ball back. I'm not for that all. What I'm proposing is they can have the option of kicking it off or going for the 4th and 15 and it's only limited to two 4th and 15's a game so if you go for them earlier in the game you're basically screwed the rest of the way. The article is in no way what I'm referring to

No, I'm not. What does that have to do with anything?

It's not another possession, it's another play with a shot at keeping possession if they convert. So just because they are losing they shouldn't get the chance to gain 15 yards on another play? Under that logic it makes no sense to even let them attempt an onside kick now because technically that gives them another chance at recovery and maintaining possession. Maybe the winning team should stop them on defense. It adds more excitement to the game. I don't know about you, but onside kicks are boring as hell to me unless it's a surprise onside and with the low recovery rate and all this preaching about player safety, eliminating it is the better option

And?

Asinine? Really? I think people pretty much shut down any rule that the NFL tries proposing simply because they are afraid of change. There is nothing asinine about a 4th and 15 play

But how often are 4th and longs converted? Who cares if people already see it. It's better option than the onside kick now

Exactly

A 4th and 15 while not as hard to convert as an onside kick, is pretty much a long shot also

No a surprise onside could still apply with this option but it would eliminate onside kicks in the obvious situations and replace them with a 4th and 15 instead

Well they could just simply make it a do over instead of penalizing for the yardage on that one play. Or move them to the spot of the foul if it's a pass interference but they still only have one chance to get a first down after the call is made

Since the onside kick has become a near impossibility for the kicking team to recover, unless it's a surprise onside. They need to put in a rule that eliminates the onside kick and replace it with a 4th and 15. If a team scores they would have the option of kicking the ball off or having a 4th and 15 at their own 35 yard line. If they get the first down the drive keeps going like normal. If they fall short, the other team takes over where they missed from. They can even make it more interesting and make it to where each team only gets two 4th and 15's a game. This would be way better than doing an onside kick which has become nearly impossible for the kicking team to recover. Would anyone be on board with this? It's actually something Steve Tasker said that the NFL Competition committee has had discussions about in the past

Honestly, looking at our opponents this year, I don't see how playoffs isn't a possibility. Outside of two guaranteed losses to the Patriots I think every game is winnable.

The Vikings only have about $2 million in cap space. That might be why

There was actually something on twitter about how the Redskins were trying to trade for a big name receiver and they thought it was possibly AJ Green. Diggs was actually one of the guys I thought about after the Antonio Brown thing. Beane should call to see if there is any truth to him being shopped

Did we even interview him at the combine? I know there were 2 or 3 TEs that we met with and neither him or Fant were one of them. They could bring one or both in for pre draft visits but if they don't I think it's a good indication that we will going TE later in the draft

Kelvin Benjamin has never been at the level of Jordy. Jordy's highlight video showed separation and times when he was on an island by himself when get caught the ball. Kelvin Benjamin never got open like that. He had 63 catches last year and a couple 8 or 9 catch games

Yep. Looks done