Buffalo03

RIP. He was part of the best Inside the NFL lineup ever with Len Dawson and Chris Collinsworth

That first play to Moulds probably would have been a horse collar tackle today if that rule had existed back then. Sad how that play ended

Michael Thomas is good, but $100 million?

I understand he said three straight days. I just didn't understand why he would be counting a day off in with that. Of course he won't he won't be practicing when the whole team isn't. You don't have to use capital letters like a douche bag. I saw what he said. I can read I get what he was saying. It just made no sense to me to count a day off when the whole team didn't practice. No need to stay in school. Half the crap other people post on here and I'm the one that has to stay in school? No

Right but you can't count one of the days because they were off. They had 4 practices which he took part of the first 3 and then had a rest day. They had yesterday off which doesn't count and then today was the 5th practice so 2 straight practices, not 3. It was noted as 3 straight days which obviously would mean 3 straight practices since you can't count a day off

For the love of God, please stop putting apostrophes in Bills

The Colts aren't going to the SB any time soon. Andrew Luck just isn't that kind of QB in my opinion. Plus their D still isn't all that great. I just don't see it. If a team has to go through Indy, maybe but not away from Indy

It's 2 straight days. He practiced the first 3 days. This is day 5

Looks like Russ Brandon is in the marketing dept

Because you're making it sound like the 2017 draft was a disaster because we never drafted him or Watson. It's not

If it's referring to me, I never said he wouldn't be good here. I said he probably wouldn't be KC level good. Big difference there

I never said Mahomes wouldn't have been good here, I'm saying that I don't believe he would have played to the level that he is in KC. There's a big difference there. We didn't have the offense good enough for him to be that good in 2017 or 2018. He may still have been good but not KC level. You're still not getting the fact that he has a coach with a good QB system which plays a big part in it

You said Milano was the only good pick in the draft. That would be incorrect. Tre'Davious is excellent, Dawkins has been good, Zay the jury is still out on and then of course Milano. Saying that Tre'Davious is a bad pick because we didn't get Mahomes or Watson is just stupid. The other thing you have to think about to is, yes Mahomes is great in an Andy Reid quarterback friendly system in which Donavan McNabb, Nick Foles, Michael Vick (Who had the best year or two of his career under Reid) and even Alex Smith have thrived in. Not saying Mahomes wouldn't have been good here but it may not have been to the level he has succeeded in in KC

I've always wondered the same thing

Derek Fine

I believe 85 was Russell Copeland. Not sure about 73. Bucky Brooks?

I think you're saying that because pretty much the whole line was bad and he just kind of blended in with it. He wasn't that bad. He had a decent year and was still our best lineman

Yeah, I understand people's gripe about missing out on both if those guys but he was saying that Tre'Davious was a bad pick because we should have taken the QBs and we didn't. He states Milano was the only good pick because of that. Tre'Davious was still an excellent pick

He was great his rookie year. He did slip a little bit last season but was still our best olineman by far. He didn't get much help to be honest

For the love of God, get over the whole Watson and Mahomes thing. We have no idea how Josh Allen is gonna turn up. We still made excellent picks in Tre'Davious and Dion Dawkins as well. The jury is still out on Zay. I believe this is his make or break season. He did have a decent 2nd season though catching 7TDs but yes, the 2017 draft is looking good

Trade them a bag of rocks for Quinnen and bring him to Buffalo. Him and Oliver will be a force in the middle. He's obviously not happy with the Jets

I would probably do it the other way around. I would play all the backups the first two games of the year and get them out of the way. Then the starters the remaining 16. If we have a shot at a playoff spot the remaining 2 weeks of the season then I want my staters, not my backups playing

You don't think that Warner deserved to be in the HOF? He went to 3 Super Bowls with 2 teams that were trash before he took over. The Rams weren't squat before he took over as starter and he lead them to 2 Super Bowls as part of one of the greatest offenses in Super Bowl history. Granted Marshall Faulk was part of that offense to but that offense was very potent. The Rams had Tony Banks as their starter in 98. Had Warner not taken over in 99 you would be crazy to think Tony Banks even with Faulk and Isaac Bruce and Torry Holt would have done anything. Sure, Warner had a few years there where his play fell off and the team around him.fell apart and he had fumbling problems but then he comes to Arizona and leads them to the only Super Bowl in franchise history after years and years of irrelevance. Sure, he had Larry Fitzgerald and Anquan Boldin but what exactly did Matt Leinart do with those same group of receivers? Nothing. To say he doesn't deserve to be in the HOF is crazy

Get to the playoffs and win at least ONE playoff game which we haven't done since 1995 give him a 3 year extension. If we go to the Super Bowl, give him a 5 year extension. If we win the Super Bowl, give him a 10 year extension. If we have 6 wins or less especially if it's 4 games or less, then fire him

Is there any way to designate Andre Roberts as just a kick return specialist? I would hate to only keep 6 receivers and lose out on one of the other guy because a kick returner is taking the spot of one of the receivers