jkeerie

It was mouse McNally. As I recall, the bills brought in other linemen in free agency and paid them huge bucks. When Peters asked for a commensurate contract, the Bills balked, leading to the rancor and eventual trade. The Bills management at the time totally blew it.

Perhaps they can free up money with restructures or extensions. It all depends on which FAs they want to go after.

I think the key to anything happening with Cleveland even thinking of trading Garrett is money... taking on his contract including his dead cap. The Watson contract is a killer for them, so they will be looking for contract relief in other areas to off set that.

I don't want to give up the draft capital or the contract money for Garrett...as much as I like him as a player. Everyone is thinking the ideal scenario. We get Garrett and he plays lights out and stays injury free. We didn't get that with Von... albeit he was older when we signed him. I'd rather spend the money resigning a lot of our young players, signing some free agents that we won't break the bank, and use this draft to build the defense and pick up a young WR or two.

If Grant is there, I go him at DT. However, if one of the top Corners or Safeties is there, I may go that route as well.

That's why I'm hoping the Bills offer him a generous and fair contract.

Ty Johnson thrives in the Bills offense. He deserves a raise, but he'd be foolish to go elsewhere.

This is the draft where you fill your defensive trenches. I'd look at free agents at positions where the draft is not deep.

I agree. I think the only way to get past it is if a friend or family member accompanies the woman to the screening for support and encouragement.

I'd love that draft! Many mocks have Emmanwori going in the 1st.

Unfortunately, many of those ways are clinical and are ignored. I actually thought this was one that got noticed...as evidenced by the discussion in this forum.

I hear you. To me the implication of the commercial was not that this is something new, but rather, because we know this is not new, too many women are still ignoring the message.

The ad was showing males who objectify breasts doing just that. To me the ad was communicating to women that just as men pay attention to women's breasts, women need to pay attention... particularly to their own breasts. So I didn't see it the way you did, likely because I am a woman.

There's awareness, but women still ignore getting regular screenings. They think if there is not a family history and they're young, they don't have to worry. Some don't have health insurance (although there are free screenings available in a number of areas) or they just don't want to be bothered. Additionally, I can tell you as a woman that the procedure is not very comfortable and in fact can be momentarily painful. I think...especially with the young Swiftie fans tuning in...it was a good opportunity to reach out to women to get screened regularly.

Eagles need to stop KC on their opening drive of the second half. Don't let them get any momentum.