MJS

If you aren't under contract how could you get fined?

Can you explain a little more why you feel this way?

He was night and day different on the long throws after the Pats game. It's like he was scared to throw them and ALWAYS made sure to lead the receiver too much. He needs to get his confidence back and be willing to throw it where the receiver can catch it. The good thing is his turnovers went way down after that game too, but he needs to really work on that area and be willing to give his receivers a fighting chance for the reception, especially Diggs who is great at contested catches.

I'll predict for Diggs: 1,150 Yards 8 TD's For John Brown: 850 Yards 6 TD's I don't think both will be 1,000 yard receivers and that Diggs eats up some targets that would have gone to Brown.

How do you explain John Brown's stats catching passes from Josh Allen? He had his best season.

Sent home again?!

I'll do whatever I want. Close down this piece of crap thread, mods!

Same goes for you, haha. If you don't like my post, ignore it. So hypocritical.

Dang, can we just lock this thread already? I think it has run its course....

It's the year he falls off a cliff (figuratively of course).

There are equal lies on all fronts, I'd say. If there's something our leaders have in common regardless of political leanings it is dishonesty.

I read that too and was a little confused. I thought he was just trying to say that both running backs are capable of "slashing" the defense, that is, to pick up chunks of yards. Even if they go about it in different ways. Or he really doesn't know the difference between the two. But he likely does. The only national people saying good things about Singletary are the ones who actually watched him.

I do not want that high note to be a Superbowl. Hopefully it's a 2,000 rushing yard campaign for a 2-14 team.

Signing all the old guys.

For the benefit of all, the word 'socialism' isn't really used correctly today. Socialism is supposed to mean that the means of production, distribution, and exchange are controlled by the people (which isn't really possible on a large scale). Marx believed that socialism is a transitional state to communism. Communism is a more extreme form of socialism. For instance, individuals cannot own property under communism. But I don't really think true communism is really that possible on a large scale either. What most people are talking about is called "Statism". High Statism means the government, rather than individuals or businesses, owns and controls major industries and the economy is planned centrally.

Moss and Epenesa will be major contributors, in my opinion.

I do wonder how accurate testing is. I've heard plenty of things to indicate that many tests are still pretty inaccurate. Lots of false positives and false negatives. But who knows? Everyone has a data point to share. I'm starting to think all COVID related data is compromised. There are countless examples of people following all protocols and still getting sick. It is impossible to eliminate the risk. People still need to leave their homes to get groceries, doctor's visits, etc. Every time you leave your house there are thousands of touch points. I don't think we need to assume these guys weren't careful. And with the number of guys in sports who have been asymptomatic I don't think the ball is being dropped. They are being tested so they are catching the asymptomatic carriers.

Ok, well I'm going to stay out of it now. I enjoy having thought provoking conversation and providing and receiving useful information. But I don't much like the bickering.

Can you quote them? I didn't see that. And I didn't see anyone saying that black people who haven't had a traditional upbringing don't matter. I see people saying that the traditional family structure is important. And if you look at the data it shows that those who grow up without one of their parents are far more likely to be in poverty, abuse drugs and alcohol, etc.

You are fully within your rights to believe in those things and so is BLM. But most people don't realize that is part of the goal. A lot of people don't want prisons and police to be abolished. They don't want a dramatic redistribution of wealth. And they don't think drugs and prostitution should be legal. They may believe in the importance of the traditional family. So they should be informed that such things are part of the BLM agenda before they get on the bandwagon. If their objective is to focus on black lives and ending racism they should look to another organization. And who said that? Nobody. You can believe families are important and also supports black people. They aren't mutually exclusive.

Yes I know. I was calling specifically out those who have chosen not to donate to them.

If you notice, companies like Nike and Netflix have chosen to donate to NAACP and other well established civil rights groups instead of BLM.

Yep. Abolition of the nuclear family is part of the broader BLM and M4BL movement. This is well known. Haha, I don't think that is in the cards these days.

They aren't quite as explicit as their partner organization M4BL (Movement for Black Lives) who calls for: 1) Abolishing all police and all prisons. 2) Progressive restructuring of tax codes at the local, state, and federal levels to ensure a radical redistribution of wealth. 3) Retroactive decriminalization, immediate release, and record expungement of all drug-related offenses and prostitution and reparations for the devastating impact of the 'war on drugs' and criminalization of prostitution. And the leaders of the Black Lives Matter organization are Alicia Garza, Patrisse Cullors, and Opal Tometiln who are self-proclaimed Marxists. BLM has been around since 2013.

The same thing can be achieved if you have a great edge rusher as well, it just compounds the difficulty for the offense to handle. Because they have to account for the edge rusher AND the possibility of an unknown blitzer.