BuffaloBillyG

A few snaps reactions: 1. Who is Dan Mitchell? 2. We almost never hear about the Bills being active in either Trade or FA markets. Then...BLAMMO moves are made sometime at night. 3. I always love when people make statements like this and circumvent it with a "That could always change" statement.

Yeah, it won't be anybody that's a top threat. More of a "we feel he can be the best version of himself with us".

I suspect that either Monday or Tuesday we will hear that Beane made a trade for a WR that wasn't really talked about prior. 25% of the board will build him up as the savior. 50% of the board will be upset the Bills didn't trade for "their guy" and 25% will just be upset at the assets that were given up to acquire said WR to be named and say it was an over pay.

Agreed. But that wasn't what was being asked.

Well let's see. That would be Broncos at Bills Chiefs at Chargers Patriots at Steelers. My winners are bolded. Division matchups would be: Chargers at Bills Patriots at Colts If that's the final 4, I like our odds. The Patriots aren't there quite yet. The Colts have Danny Dimes at QB and sooner or later, the Chargers are gonna Charger.

Well, let's break it down. Allen/Mahomes - kinda cancel each other out. Allen is, I feel the better football player but Mahomes comes through in the clutch.. especially in playoffs. Cook/Pacheco - Cook is far superior. Shakir/Hollywood - I give the edge to Shakir here as Brown is kind of a one trick pony. Coleman/Worthy - I give the edge to Worthy for his big play ability Kincaid/Kelce - If we are talking careers, Kelce easily. If we are talking this season, I actually think they cancel each other out much like Mahomes/Allen. Kincaid's arrow is pointing up and Kelce is slowing. He's still a crafty vet So in my view, the Bills win 2 of the match ups. The Chiefs 1. And 2 draws. But now imagine if the Bills traded for a guy like Olave or Waddle and put them in Coleman's spot.

This entire thread has so many dog whistles in it that it made the Chiefs Planet HoF.

This is a wonderfully worded thread that will lead to nothing but objective and constructive discussions on the topic at hand. And I'm sure everyone will read the article and know what they are discussing before just posting a knee jerk reaction.

The same vibes as DHop's Buffalo Soldier post.

From comments he himself has made, it's the consistency of prepping week in and week out that eludes him. McDermott even said the maturation is something he still needs to do. To me he strikes me as the kind of guy that the game always came easy to. Always kind of like that big fish in the little pond. But now that the pond is bigger and some of the fish around him are better, he doesn't know how to respond. Before the NFL, a guy like Coleman could do well with just his athletic traits. But that isn't enough at this level.

The biggest issue with the Browns is the owner. As a team, they have a lot of things I like. Really good defense with a top notch pass rusher. I like Judkins as a player. They had a really solid draft. They need a QB, but they gave away Mayfield. Then traded Flacco to the Bengals. Their horrible management of the QB position is laughable.

Not to mention that Post-June 1, 2026 trade: The dead cap hit would be split over two years, with a charge of $31,788,000 in 2026 and $52,681,000 in 2027. So the Bills would pay Allen $84M over the next two years to NOT play for us as well as financially cripple the organization for the foreseeable future. All for what looks to be a late round 1st.

My biggest issue with Coleman isn't that he isn't good. It's that he isn't consistent. He's had some good games and produced. He shows that he's capable. But, I believe he has a very poor work ethic and doesn't have that inner push to want to work to be great.

And according to that list the Colts and Broncos appear to be going it naked this week.

Check his film from last year. He's the same player he was then. People are noticing it more this year. He was an awful liability last year.