RoyBatty is alive

He might be correct. Maybe it is payback for Sanchez, because of him Jarius Byrd is a multi-millionaire.

So how far did he end up throwing the ball? Or how far can he throw it?

That is a liittle scary

Edmunds

I think an O Line and competent receivers are pretty damn important.

How does he have a better chance at sticking then the two WRs the Bills actually picked ahead of him, no way al three are going to stick.

This might be the worst thread today which is quite the "accomplishment".

Please dont include Rosens's mom, she has a horse face

If you are going to start a thread like this I think common sense would dictate you actually post both pictures, and say which is which? I have no idea who is pictured above.

Instead of asking if he was gay why didnt he just ask him if he took it up the keister

I cant find you a team because I dont know what ANY team really thinks of any QB.

As I said,, it the team in question thinks there is one, i dont care about what the consensus is.

If the team in question thinks they are potentially getting the next John Elway (or whoever) then it is worth it and I think a trade like that is not out of the question but someone else did raise a good point, how many rookies does Cleveland really need. The team is stupid young as it is.

If, and granted this a big if, they think all of the "top 4" are basically risk adjusted equal, imo they would be doing the absolute right thing by by trading away the number one pick if they got some stupid compensation like one teams entire draft for the year and next years #1. To paraphrase Marv Levy, Once you start doing things to placate fans, you might as well join them in the stands. I was being facetious but I stand by my argument they would be well served to trade away #1 IF 1) they thought the top four were all about "the same" (highly unlikely) and 2) they get a kings ransom for it (which they would).

I would disagree with that, they are going to have a shot at one, maybe two of the "top 4" QBs with their 4th pick. Knowing the Browns the would probably be better off letting "the market" select which QB they would chose because left to their own they will pick the one bust of the group.

Do you realize he/she is jerking you around?

Damn shame, could you imagine the betting action placed on that horse solely on the name. This is the only value added here to these otherwise totally waste of a teme thread.

I was discussing his Bills press conference, not his past college history from 3-4 years ago.

1) Football is a team sport, he had a great team around him. 2) Want to go by wins/losses, he lost every NFL playoff game he was in, the one where he fumbled the ball away on the 5 yrd line to end the game. 3) Flutie completed 54.7% of his NFL passes, with an 76 QB Rating, never passed for more than 3450 yards. 4) Flutie sucked, he was a dynamic fan favorite but is wildly overrated QB (really just by Bill fans) on a ills team with probably the best defense the team every had in its history 5) Flutie sucked..

Flutie did suck. He won games because we had arguably the best defense in the Bills history one year set a franchise record low number of points. He had his one shot in the playoffs with the bills and fumbled the game away at the end on the five yard line. Flutie is the most wildly overrated (by fans) bills player of all time and it isnt even close. More importantly, it is long, long past due for Bills fans to get over it.

acquitted themselves, yeah, no major misstatements but as i said i was underwhelmed, boring pat answers, didnt come off as dynamic leaders to me, which I think is important to be a good nFL qb

I got a good chuckle out of this, yes I would say I wasnt overwhelmed.

Probably correct, actually despite last years debacle I would rather have Peterman than Kyle. I wouldn't draft him, I am not a big arm guy but he doesn't have close to an NFL are and never will. Agree 100%.

I dont think it is that ridiculous considering some of the comments made about Rosen and I have no idea why you would think the poster has "bias" against Rosen.

not at all.