RoyBatty is alive

Thats great. I think it was a broken ankle, havent heard.

Really? Care to elaborate? No, not even close. this keeps Kapernick "relevant" for another few years, certainly makes some Nike adds execs thrilled that is for sure. Wonder when the commercial will be coming.

Hi Dan Darragh. I might be the only Bills fan that used to love Dan Darragh play, man he was not afraid to air the ball out, like an old AFL QB.

To your points 8 & 9 on the PAts and D, the reason they can do both of those is they have probably the best secondary in the NFL including the much maligned (by Bills fnas) Stephon Gilmore. The PAts are very content to go man on man almost all the time, that allows them the flexibility to blitz whenever they want to. They also play a lot of cover zero and that is why,to your point "looks like they have 14 guys playing back there" is because they have so many guys on the line, you never knew where the rushers (blitz) is coming from. Or they can drop many back if they want to, T=that is how Sam Darnold that he was "seeing ghosts". All those possibilities open up because they can leave the DBs on islands freeing up so many other defenders.

Did you bother to even read the post beyond the title, probably not. Here spelled out for you, quoting his post, " am not saying that our schedule will be tough because of WHO we are playing, but because of WHERE we will be playing. West coast road games are hard." We are going to have to travel to the west coast 4 times next year, and a possible game in London. THAT is in fact a tough schedule. Exactly, it is truly stunning how so many people responded without either reading the post or failing in simple reading comprehension.

Schiff's question was Speculative question abut someone else's mindset on a phone call they didnt hear, come on, that is beyond absurd. Pure wild ass conjecture at best. That has as much credibility of asking me what i think Gary Busey 's mindset right now, total absurdity.

Schiff reminds me a lot of Adam Gase, both bug eyed loons.

What relevance is Acosta? I could easily debate the Acosta scenario, often getting a harsh conviction is difficult if not impossible and you have to plea bargain, fact of life but keep dumping on Acosta who paid the price bey quitting. You cant stop bringing him up and after all he is gone. Is that all you have to hang your hat.

Kidding right? You seriously think that? If true then why is it Schiff that wants to hide him and lie that he doesnt know his name (sad yet laughable so absurd) , not that anyone that cares in the world doesnt already know his name.

If that is true, than I stand corrected.

She was yeilded time from Nunes and Schiff denied her the time. Again Schiff just kind of makes up the rules as it fits his agenda, and then switch them back again when expedient.

the first go round. He had to let her go the second This "witness" is all about emotion, very sorry for her, she was done wrong by the Evil sexist Trump. She isn't a witness to ANYTHING at all, was let go months before the alleged impeachable events took place.

There is a very simple reason why Schiff wouldn't let Stefanik speak the first go round. Stefanik is a woman and they want to keep the appearance of this poor females Abassador that was unfairly fired and humiliated by the mean sexist Donald Trump. Schiff doesn't want a Republican woman to question her , it would diminish the allusion of her being a female victim of secxst male republicans led by the evil emperor Trump. Very shrewd on the part of Schiff, i guess Democratic real tme focus groups are working.

Yeah because after all Clinton and the Clinton foundation there was no, i mean n corruption at all. The Clinton Foundation is one of the biggest money luandering scheme of all time.

Pelosi is like most politicians, she really doesnt give a damn what is good for the country, being in power is all that matters and getting rid of Trump is her #1 priority. Lets take just one example, the Democrats are now the party of war and engagement, they wanted Trump to attack Turkey, they were outraged when he took troops out of Syria, they are outraged he is trying to make peace ion North Korea. There are trillions of dollars in the war economy and a lot of politicians have made a lot of money with military industrial complex? How long are we going to keep troops in South Korea? How long are we going to continue overpaying for NATO?

Any intellectual honesty you have is long long gone.

I confess I did watch for about one minute that Amb Taylor, what an arrogant bombastic ass, he really does think he is superior and he sets that national agenda, people on both sides of the aisle should be scared of these bureaucratic unelected officials thinking they are in charge and the PRESIDENT has to answer to them

I cant imagine wasting time watching all these sanctimonious blowhards

Agreed 1000%, there aint NO way the NFL forked over millions just to leave themselves open to be sued again. Florio's entire "take" is asinine.

This seems to be to bizarre, a second grievance? "file a second grievance alleging collusion and/or retaliation arising from his prior collusion grievance, which reportedly was settled for payment in the range of $1 million and $10 million." If the NFL is really stupid enough to settle the first grievance case for millions of $ without adequate agreement by Kap to eliminate any future liability, then they are dumb beyond comprehension. Oh not so fast, not so fast. The team that signs him will be lauded as heroes by most of the media and most of social media. Ironically a team like San Fran should sign him, you think they would lose a lot of fans for signing him, they might net gain fans and $.

Yeah, Team Nike did...gotta keep Kaepernick "relevant"

momentum ace

ok, i didnt see it i was just read what the OP wrote. So why not have goodwin go in motion sideways pre snap to get a good head of steam and then turn up field And goodwin is literally a world class speedster, not sure how many guys in the NFL could match him

true but Goodwin running to the line will be the ultimate "tell" as to when the ball will be snapped

I dont think it will catch on, two big problems with it. 1st, it has to be timed perfectly, if the timing is off by a second, easy to get offside and what if the receiving team moves blockers before the snap, there wont my any time to reset the blocking...... 2nd it will give the receiving team the go ahead when to start the rush