RoyBatty is alive

His assets are fungible but i doubt liquid. First of all, he had a bunch or partnerships and mineral interests, whatever he sold for wasn't 100% net to him. Second, i have little doubt there was substantial debt associated with it, make it tax and economically efficient. Probably had trusts for his kids, some they cant touch for years, companies inside of partnerships inside LLCs. A straight up cash sale would result in a $1 billion tax bill easy.

Wow this is just too rich. They have figured out a way to make Joe Biden the victim. His inability to talk coherently wont be able to be attacked or made an issue as he is now "handicapped". Then as senility is proves painfully obvious that will be off bounds and cruel to pick on poor Joe, it will be age discrimination.

Ever wonder why most bankruptcies are filed in Delaware? You got it, Uncle Joe. Bet you anything that was driven by the financial institutions and credit card companies that have been paying him off for decades.

Love it, thoughtful not sure i totally agree with it, would make for a great in depth conversation. Now that is not how it works, trust me it isnt that simple. I would be absolutely stunned if he has net of debt $2.5 billion "liquid".

already responded about to this, this isnt the NF rulebook and the specifics of this event arent covered.

That wasnt quoting the rule book and it was hardly inclusive of what occurred. As i said you can either believe an expert in NFL officiating or use your own unbiased interpretation. If you want to go to the NFL rule book and prove me wrong knock yourself out. I am going to bet the rule book is not inclusive of what acually happened,. No one outside of disgruntled Bill fans cares about this at all so i doubt the NFL rules committee will even address what happened. At some point a thing called common sense should take over.

And you can be sarcastic and demand i show you the rule or accept what a former VP of NFL's former VP officiating says. If you want to prove how incorrect i am, you go look up the rule.

Common, no not common, never happened before, yest it has. NFL has bent over backwards to make kickoffs as benign as possible and this is a reflection of it, returner gave himself up.

Why are you asking a question you have already received the answer to, I have already gone though that with you about 10 times in Shoutbox,

Mike Pereira, the NFL’s former vice president of officiating, backed up the call being change. “Didn’t see what happened on the touchback in the end zone but even if you don’t down it, tossing the ball to the official or dropping the ball intentionally ends the play,” Pereira wrote on Twitter. “You are deemed to have given yourself up.” I guess i will chose to believe Pereira.

When a player "gives himself UP' which is what it was ruled there is intention in that so yes intention does in fact matter. Player had no intention to return it, there is no debate about that, all he did was field it and politely lob it to the official.

No need to kneel If a ball gets to the end zone and touches the ground, it’s an automatic touchback. There’s no need for a player to pick it up and kneel, or even catch a ball if it’s headed for the end zone and they don’t intend to return it. This is a small time saver, but the goal is to blow a play dead earlier so that unnecessary collisions don’t happen. Under the previous rules, a player could take their time gathering a ball and kneeling while the coverage team and return team blockers still careened toward each other for no reason.

There is NO comparison to dropping a ball in the field of play and a returner in the endzone lobbing the ball to a ref. Get real.

All the ref had to do was catch the ball, just like is common in today NFL returners catch the ball and lob it to the ref. Had he done that none of us would give it a thought for a nanosecond. But no Ref had to make a big deal about it. It is is the rule book, play is over when players gives himself up. 1) no, If a retuner is outside the endzone, he is a runner like a RB, in the end zone he is not unless he makes a football move 2) no it doesnt, only if you are out of the field of play

1) fielding a KO is nothing at all like running in the middle of the field 2) Makes no sense as the clock wouldn't stop anyway.

No common sense needs to be used MORE often. Some of the worst NFL decisons have by by "the Rule". Look at the tuck rule, it is in the book, like at Calvin Johnson rule, that is also in the book, the Dez Bryant non-catch,,,,,,,,some of the most absurd rulings of all time but hey, they followed the rules.

"Mike Pereira, the NFL’s former vice president of officiating, backed up the call being change. “Didn’t see what happened on the touchback in the end zone but even if you don’t down it, tossing the ball to the official or dropping the ball intentionally ends the play,” Pereira wrote on Twitter. “You are deemed to have given yourself up.” Pretty obvious and straightforward to me. Bills fans have a tough time psychologically on this one for sure. By the way, I think such a poll here at a Buffalo Bills chatroom will come up with totally logical and unbiased responses.

Higgins wont be around in Rd #2 imo

applicable to all sports... 110% god i hate that Also A player's coach and just for bill fans Trust the process

The entire Russian Hoax should have been better thought out, without it I dont think anyone would have known about Hunter Biden payofffs from both China and the Ukraine, god only knows what other Biden relatives got rich off that senile corrupt old man.. Probably a lot of Republicans wil be discovered to have done similiar thinsg and they were happy to not publicize what Biden was doing.

No, the Russian farce been totally debunked. So were all the Democrats that have been screamng about Trump and the bug eyed politician (forget his name) that keep claiming he had "proof" but never said what it was, were they ALL in on the "coverup'? I can only assume you have been lied to every day for three years and psychologically you cant give it up. Either that or really you know but you want to keep the narrative up even if intellectualy dishonest.

LOL of COURSE he does, I never insinuated he doesn't. And the rest of your comments will have to wait for a response from me, i have to get to real work (lunch lol) for once. Back in a few hours

Fair & honest response, i sincerely appreciate it. I am very proud of most of what he has done, the things that really matter like policy decisions and the economy, second to none. And he has done it with 80% of the MSM, 100% of the democrats, 50% of the republicans, and the "deep state" ALL doing what they can to sabotage him. He was the first president to clean up the ancient and faulty NAFTA trad agreement, grow a set and stop the trade abuse by China, First Step Act, clean up the VA make them accountable for once, a lot of huge positives. His biggest fault has been the deficit, he has been totally unable to stop the political beauracy from obscene spending. Look at yourself, as far as I can tell you have basically dedicated your life to demonizing him, obssessed with hatred and negativiety...a pretty bad way to go through life IMO. I can predict almost exactly your reaction to anything he does. Like your WW III prediction when Trump grew a set and took out the Iranina general that was responsible for hundreds of dead and mamed US soldiers. Now some of Trumps tweets he things he says, I shudder at but thenagain at this point i stopped caring about some of his chidish comments.

Serious question. Are you proud of Joe Biden being the apparent de-facto Democratic nominee?

Good man Virgil, very nice of you.