Jump to content

RoyBatty is alive

Community Member
  • Posts

    6,386
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by RoyBatty is alive

  1. Have to agree wit this for sure. Right Tackle for years was one of the Bills weakest spots. Recall Eric Pears followed by Cyrus Kouandijio followed by several years of Jordan Mills. Have to agree wit this for sure. Right Tackle for years was one of the Bills weakest spots. Recall Eric Pears followed by Cyrus Kouandijio followed by several years of Jordan Mills.
  2. In the second half that is a big understatement, but yes he had a tough assignment. The entire O Line after the Bills go to 28 seemed to disintegrate, the last quarter was particularly dreadful. J Allen running around like a chicken with his head cut off at time, not sure if it was his fault, the O Line , the receivers or a combination.
  3. What, except the second half. They and Allen looked horrific in thelast quarter absent that last drive and "generous" PI call.
  4. GOOD ONE. A new definition of the new era of 1% ers....the uninformed.
  5. I hope the Jets do Go on a mini run, as long as the lose again to us.... beat the Fins twice and lose out in the Trevor Lawrence contest
  6. 18-15 Bills. Should be a defensive battle as both offenses will struggle. J Allen comes off the his league leading passing as the Rams gets heavy pass rush on us. Rams also have a difficult time scoring esp if Milano & Edmunds play near 100%.
  7. Did the Patriots do that? Actually I dont recall BUT lets be honest, it isn't a bad strategy...unethical and underhanded but I can see the logic of trying that.
  8. That was the best Bills game IMO since the Super Bowl Era. That was also the Fitzpatrick peak with the Bills.
  9. Yes i think 99% of those that understand NFL lines know that. Thanks for Stating the obvious.
  10. Fitz in the HOF, lol. If by some miracle he lasts another 5 years and gets in the top 15 of passing yards all time then he has a shot, beyond that, give it up. Testaverde and Carson Palmer are in the top 15 and arent in the HOF and both had greater NFL success than has Fitz. Time for Bill fans to stop "adopting" Fitzpatrick as some kind of patron saint for the Bills, he has been on 7 other teams already and hasnt been on the Bills for 7 years..
  11. They are already favored against the Rams so there you go.
  12. No I never agreed to point 1. And i never said or intimated it is easier to hack a system and cover it up than bribe an official. Never said that at all so if you want to have an intellectually honest conversation great, if you want to make things up go at it yourself. No not at all, i gave you a plausible reason why, as so many crazed conspiracy theorists are asserting the kick was editted out. I dont know if it was and really dont care either way. But for some to allege the NFL: is up to something nefarious is laughable
  13. Where was it so WIDELY agreed upon it was incorrect, absent here and by Bills fans. Maybe he is dismissive because he can think objectively and is not blinded by his Bills fandom.
  14. Makes sense to me, unless you want to put on your tin foil conspiracy hat that the NFL went out of their way top remove the meaningless field goal kick that no one cares about except a handful of crazed Bills fans care about. I dont know what they replaced it with but sorry, Frank Gore a future Hall of Famer is a lot more topical right now than our rookie field goal kicker. that missed a non-material kick.
  15. This I agree with 100%. NFL has been buddying up to gambling/fantasy football for years, that is why the injury reports are so detailed now
  16. HAHAHA i didnt write it was "proof", i wrote "anecdotal proof". If that concept it so obscure to you, educate yourself and look it up.
  17. Maybe they decided that no one in the right mind, absent crazed Bills fans, would waste the time to want to see a rookie miss a field goal where it had zero outcome of the game. I would bet any money that a game winning kick at the end of the game would still be on the highlight reel.
  18. Dead horse beating. You have no "proof" the field goal was good, zip zero, nada. Not going to keep going over the same thing repeatedly. There is "anecdotal proof" of the pats hacking technology, reference the headset "malfunctions' and Flutie comment about hearing the coaches communicating when he picked up a QBs helmet after the time to communicate expired...i didnt make those up or dream them. I never said they did for a fact so now I dont have some "onus" to prove otherwise.
  19. Did they? The NFL is so freaking stupid that they would doctor highlight reels of a missed field goal so Bills fanatics could cite that as the NFL essentially admitting Bass made the field goal. There is one thing to be a fan, a homer,......another to be, imo, irrational.
  20. The onus is on me to prove? Read what I wrote, "I do think the probably screwed", note the key words "think' and "probably". If you dont think a multibillion organization with a penchant for cheating in the past is capable of hacking technology, well that is your opinion i wont bother to respond to.
  21. The catch rule absolutely introduced/involves technology..... multiple slow motion high fidelity cameras and replays emerged. Hack technology on the NFL, sure it already hasn't happened? I do think the probably pats screwed around for years with the QB-HC communication as well as the other teams telecom. No you THINK or want the call on the field to be the wrong call, you don't know for a fact...if you think you do there is no point in further debate. Ah hah, maybe the ref under the field goal; post bet the under! Start a thread on that see what kind of traction it gets.
  22. It proves nothing except that someone else thought it was good off the same view everyone has seen...except for the officials perfectly positioned under the goal posts. Thank God we won our the non-stop conspiracy theories would be running rampant.
  23. Actually i can deny it and if we lost be 3 points I wouldn't debate it ad nauseam as we are here with this otherwise meaningless points, i would have moved on, its a judgement call, sometimes they go against you, deal with it. Only "precedent" it could possibly set is if the official made a demonstrably wrong call which, imo, i stil havent seen.
  24. You want the NFL or football go go "all technology", good for you, I dont. I have already cited the fiasco the NFL has made about what a catch is. And what happens if technology malfunctions and gets the call wrong? Yeah good luck trying to solve that. My money is the Pats will learn a creative way to trick the fool proof technology. give them time and study. Football is a game of judgement officiated and run by people, seeking perfections if not attainable IMO. Would i like perfection, sure if the cost/time/hassle are not excessive.
×
×
  • Create New...