Jump to content

UConn James

Community Member
  • Posts

    9,037
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by UConn James

  1. In short, they take our money, our aid, and everything we got, and then spit right in our eyes.

    180235[/snapback]

     

    In ten years, add in 'the death of 5,000 soldiers' and this will be an apt description of Iraq.

     

    We don't have flooding and droughts in Texas, energy crisis in California, wildfires in the West, hurricanes in the East that should take precedence over sending billions overseas to feed people who will be killing us tomorrow for our generosity?

  2. Bettis has been a Buffalo-killer in the past few games vs. Pitt. No matter if everyone thinks he's in decline, or he's a back-up. Whatever. He always put up big numbers.

     

    It's just something about a back that has that particular combination of speed, size and a low center of gravity that is hard to tackle.

     

    An injury to him, not to wish for anything serious tho, would be good news for the playoff chances. A seven-game win streak is great but it should worry some people that this situation is ripe for a let-down. Streaks come to an end.

  3. From the "If you can't beat them, join them" file.

    176049[/snapback]

     

    Uhm, with numbers like three-quarters of Americans in favor of a woman's right to choose, this isn't an issue that needs revision for them.

     

    The election was won on security, with the "don't change horses in midstream" argument (tho, people maybe should have considered that this president will be looking to ford deeper and rougher bodies of water in the next term). The solution for the Dems isn't by becoming Republican-lite.

  4. ...are they gonna be all over Dangling Chad's * like glue. 

     

    The tabs have been riding him for coming up short in big games--Sunday's to the Patsies is another Exhibit-A.  If the Dog-Ass Jets fail to make the playoffs after being in the WC driver's seat most of the way, well, I can only imagine what the scribes will write then.

    179826[/snapback]

     

    If they lose against the Seagulls, Chadwick will have some time to deliver journalism lectures on what a privilege it is for the NY sports media to be covering every word that comes out of his mouth.

     

    When he takes the silver spoon out, that is.

     

    priv·i·lege ('priv-lij) noun --- a right or immunity granted as a peculiar benefit, advantage, or favor : PREROGATIVE; especially : such a right or immunity attached specifically to a position or an office

     

    Last time I looked, the NFL and the media have a symbiotic relationship, aka mutual parasitism.

  5. What happens when that "free speech" symbolizes past physical aggression/intimidation?  Does it continue to carry those threats?  If it doesn't, when did it stop?

    176488[/snapback]

     

    Some great questions that no one here is bothering to answer. In certain similar cases, the high court has ruled that some such acts are immediate threats to the person and go beyond the parameters of free speech.

     

    Does this apply to the Confederate flag? A case could be made that it represents a body politic that supported slavery and all the trappings that went along with it including whippings, lynchings, etc. Another case could point to the fact that it was on top of the General Lee and has lost the old connotation. Then again, I think that second argument is full of stevestojan....

     

    Yet another skank looking for a way to shock people and get her name in the paper. Congratulations, honey, you got it. Now try getting any kind of management job and see how many employers want to be behind the 8 ball in a discrimination lawsuit.

     

    "Freedom of speech is like the freedom to jump off your roof and fly. You can try it, but there's going to be consequences." - ?

  6. Great quote in the red.

     

    By the Rep. lawyers take on the issue, someone could walk into the voting station, steal the box of paper ballots, drive off with them, and if not caught that day they won't count. There's no difference b/w this scenario and some jackoff WA polling place worker either being irretrievably stupid or illegally tampering with/"misplacing" the ballots.

     

    Count every vote that was cast by a legitimate voter. Whoever gets the most votes wins. That's how this works. But it's kind of sad when you have to realize that this kind of stupid crap happens everywhere and we never hear about it.

  7. Almost all union bosses vote for dems, who take their votes for granted and give them NAFTA in return.

    170834[/snapback]

     

    The only point I want to make among the detritus.... Repubs spoon out a lie and people too lazy to pay attention or research things gobble it up.

     

    It's amazing how many times I need to point this out.

     

    This was one of the issues where Clinton broke from the Dems; yeah, some voted for it to go along w/ the Pres, or for their own reasons. Many didn't. NAFTA was essentially the reason Perot ran, to give conservatives who didn't want to sell out their country another choice.

     

    Washington Watch Archives

     

    This strategy of picking a course first and then finding allies is the pattern emerging from the Clinton White House's first year's legislative agenda.  Unwilling to simply follow the course of least resistance within the Democratic party, the President begins by defining an issue and taking support where he finds it -- even if that means that the majority of his support comes from Republicans (as was the case with NAFTA)
  8. Do you know the definition of STOP-LOSS???

     

    This 'keeps unit cohesion' BS excuse is just another reason for avoiding the draft issue to keep numbers up, or actually having to come up with a viable strategy with limited human resources. Stop-loss is not viable; it has the opposite effect that it proclaims. Thus, the letter, a prime example.

    170831[/snapback]

     

    Stop-loss is a big reason why my brother got out of active duty right after they took him out of it. (An a-hole, dumbschitt commander was another.) Still does Reserves, tho.

     

    Opposite effect is right. A lot of people will leave just for spite. This is being shown in the current recruiting and retention rates.

     

    Army National Guard recruiters are 30 percent short of their goals, the New York Times reports today: "The sharp decline in recruiting is significant because National Guard and Army Reserve soldiers now make up nearly 40 percent of the 148,000 troops in Iraq, and are a vital source for filling the ranks, particularly those who perform essential support tasks, like truck drivers and military police."

     

    An Army recruiter from Brooklyn has an idea about why the Reserves aren't luring lines of ready recruits these days: "People have the misconception that everyone goes to war and gets killed," he said. Well, can you blame them?

     

    The biggest drain on recruitment is the soldiers who leave active duty deciding against the Guard and Reserves -- they know they'll likely get sent away to Iraq or Afghanistan for a 12-month tour. These soldiers know the drill; many have been there already. "Indeed, many of the active-duty soldiers the Army would like to enlist in the Reserves have recently fought in Afghanistan or Iraq, and some have no inclination to do so again," the Times reported.

     

    One proposed solution is to attract more recruits with bigger signing bonuses: $15,000 for soldiers who sign up for six years (tax-free if they sign overseas!)and $10,000 for new enlistees. Is that a big enough reward for risking life and limb for this administration's bungled military escapades? For many cash-strapped soldiers and potential enlistees, it just may be incentive enough -- fitting with our history of luring and sending the less privileged among us to fight our wars.

     

    -- Geraldine Sealey

  9. Yes, I know what the bureaucracy does, which is why I am against having countless, unnecessary layers of it preventing our tax dollars from reaching the people who need it the most: our kids.

     

    People keep complaining that there is not enough money to get updated books for our kids, but do not seem to have a problem with the fact that the money that could be used for those books is instead used by pencil-pushers who have no effect on the quality of education.

     

    We could spend the same amount of money on education that we do now. Eliminate the multiple layers of bureaucracy and you would be suprised at how much is left over for the tools necessary to educate our children.

    168977[/snapback]

     

    This is an honest question, where are the unnecessary layers? What are the job titles that get eliminated? And how do you fill the holes they leave?

     

    I'm sure there are in the higher reaches of state govts of boards, etc. But this doesn't break the bank or provide much relief in a budget. Who takes the place of whatever work they do? It's kind of hard to get qualified people to just volunteer for a full-time job.

     

    On the town/city level, most boards of ed are comprised of volunteers or they get a nominal sum, to give a broad direction and oversight of expenses.

     

    Are there too many principals? Secretaries? Nurses? PhysEd teachers....?

  10. Nice try at putting words in my mouth. Too bad they are not true.

     

    How much money is spent on bureaucracy before it even reaches the kids? Wouldn't that money be better spent on our children, instead of being thrown down a black hole?

    168898[/snapback]

     

    Wasn't trying to put words in your mouth. That was a general comment. Then again, what's the alternative to public education? Private education, where the results will be the same. But it'll be private industry, so that'll make it great. The point is not about "throwing money at" a problem. That's not the solution. The point being made was that the system in place takes money away b/c of a situation that is out of the control of teachers. In the face of that, the incentive is high to cheat and tweak numbers.

     

    Do you actually know what the "bureaucracy" does? Or are you just railing b/c they earn a salary for doing the foundation work that no one sees? It's like people who complain about CEOs and VPs. Only you don't usually go into education to get rich....

     

    Maybe we should just give the $4K each directly to the students so they can conduct their own education. No administrative waste then. I'm sure it won't be spent on video games and Bugles. :D

  11. Actually, when you are talking about the government, you do NOT get what you pay for. Quantity <> quality.

     

    When things do not work, just add more government spending.

    168817[/snapback]

     

    It's amazing how people think that every govt program is a waste of money while industry runs such a tight ship.

     

    It's funny when you're looking for help in the store or going to fill an order how the person behind the desk looks to be busy. Then s/he stands up, and the mirror behind them reveals that they play solitare very stupidly too.

     

    Gov't, military, industry, consumer spending, whatever. When human beings are involved, there will be a roughly equal level of (in)efficiency. Govt is a convenient whipping boy tho.

  12. it is easy to say it was a deliberate cheap shot when they do a slowmotion frame by frame replay.

     

    but the reality is this game is played at 100 miles an hour....and it takes less then a fraction of a second for a player who is going for a ball....all of a sudden to look as if he is going for the head.

    168513[/snapback]

     

    That is initially what I thought.

     

    Until I saw Darius' follow-through from the opposite angle.

     

    Not only was there no attempt to pull back, he followed through on the clothesline as the guy was almost to the ground. He didn't even kneel/hover over Fergeson to see if he was OK. It was deliberate.

  13. Well, maybe they could do graphics like  "Willis Magehee game data provided by Red Bull" or "To find out more Magehee info and related Willis products go to www.nfl/bills/magehee/goshopping.com". Of course the day is fast approaching when you can access shopping on your tv that quickly.

    166134[/snapback]

     

    That's going to be the day I shoot my TV. :w00t:;)

  14. Seriously. Not since the dark days of Howard Cosell have I been motivated to turn the tv sound down and find a radio broadcast of the game. Both the espn and abc crews(except for Al Micheals) are beyond annoying. I would like to see either a tivo/dss option that lets you turn mouthpieces off and just have the ambient stadium sounds audible. In addition you would have to have more stats viewable to keep up to date with the game but they would just be visible between plays. I remember way back that one of the networks tried doing this with a NHL game once (on a saturday and the game was between the Bruins and Flyers I think) and it really was pretty cool. The sound was enhanced and I didnt miss the announcers at all. Now I think, as far as the NHL goes, I would miss the Hockey Night In Canada crew because they are some of the best play by play guys around. But as far as the NFL goes nothing would be missed.  Anyway, just thought I would throw this idea out there.

    166111[/snapback]

     

    A great idea that will never see fruition.

     

    They need to push the NFL brand and player's names and faces. $ $ $.

  15. Or "Hey...do you realize we got Willis "freaking" McGahee for a decent #2 receiver, at 1/5 the salary?"

    165892[/snapback]

     

    I love that sentence. :w00t:;)

     

    Peerless is the ultimate Leon.

     

    Maybe his experience will influence the next #2 who thinks he's worth #1 money. He probably would have earned more money over the course of a career in Buffalo at a lesser contract, than his 1-June-salary-cap-cut arse will ever get elsewhere.

  16. PPP.

     

    FYI, Time doesn't select POTY by who they like the most or think is the greatest guy. It's whoever made the most impact on the world stage in the past year, regardless of the good or evil they might have done to earn that distinction. As testament, they selected Komehni(?) several years ago, and Zarqawi was in the running this year.

  17. How many cold weather games did bayou-boy Brett Favre play in before Green Bay?

     

    Willis carries the rock much better than Travis. No offense, but it's going from Top 10 to Top 3. I'll take that upgrade.

     

    Weather isn't an excuse. The other team isn't playing in a plastic cocoon, don't you know.

×
×
  • Create New...