ch19079

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor..._necrophilia_dc its my life, and if i want to have sex with dead people, i should be able to. i guess i wont be moving to cali any time soon...

good question. the jags had 2 VERY good DTs, and they stoped us most of the time. we cant run up the middle, so toss plays and of tackle plays should be run alot. i liked our screens and our O-Line protected bledsoe so that makes me feel better. but, i dont want to say its a must win vs. the raiders, but 0-2 and we have to play the pats, is NOT a good begining to a season.

ROOKIE RECIEVERS RARELY MAKE AN IMPACT THERE FIRST YEAR. Bolden was a rare thing. i look for evans to get more receptions in the second half of the year, and NEXT year, get the #2 spot.

they were ok, for most of the game, but.. the play where moulds streched out for the first down as he was going out of bounds, and the refs reviewed it. OMG!!! i knew what happened. he streched out, then steped out of bounds. so where the ball was when he steped out of bounds was past the first down marker. but our little "former bills player" acts like the refs didnt say the right thing, or "if he was out of bounds he cant strech to get more yards" type of BS. i can understand if they were former Jags players, but they wernt. just one thing i noticed, and was NOT happy about.

first: no they dont. they played well, but giving up a 40 yard pass of 4th down is a MAJOR mistake. then the holding call on 3rd and 1 KILLED us. then we stoped blitzing and didnt bump there recievers at the line to disrupt there timing routes. 1st and goal from the 1 and we settle for a field goal... WTF!!! i know we cant run up the middle agenst there DTs. so why not toss it to the out side??? why didnt bledsoe pass to a wide open guy in the endzone insted of taking a sack??? why cant lindell make a 40 yard fieldgoal, when a rookie who SUCKED in training camp (i watched that show on the nfl network...) can make his kicks. i about broke holes in my walls after that play.... but its not the end of the world. we shut down one of the best RBs in the game, for only 50 yards. and except for that 40 yard pass on 4th down, which was a jump ball :I starred in Brokeback Mountain: our secondary looked good. (i now know malloy is MUCH MUCH better than wire, i saw wire miss a few tackles and get beat in coverage a few times). Kelsey had a few pressures, and forced a few bad passes. our O-Line game bledsoe ALOT of time to pass, but are aliitle lacking in run blocking (mainly cus of the 2 probowl DTs. (the raiders also have good DTs. we need to figure out a way to get around them). i saw a a few screens . and they were early in the game, to keep the blitzes down. i saw bledsoe see the blitz and get the ball to the hot reciever (he droped it, but it was still a good read...) we had 3 turnovers on defense. , and we didnt throw an INT, just a backwards pass fumble, which i saw as just good defense on there part. few penalties, but the few we had, came at HORRABLE times. so really we need to improve our kicking game, and not give up the big play on 4th down. so its not the end of the world, and we are playing much better than last year. and its the first game of the year. so why the hell is everyone talking like its the end of the world???

i could have swarn the announcer said it was on pussywillow. i really thaught i heard that, is he still on our team??

all those games have the falcons eather far in the playoffs or winning the superbowl. i do see vick carrying his team to the playoffs, but not to the superbowl. they have NO D, and not enouph O, to outscore everyone.

they always make it look like that team "could" win the SB. i bet they say the same thing about the bungles, or hell, even the giants, or jets, or steelers.

some teams have 3 "kickers" punter, FG kicker, and kickoffs. but most arnt willing to use that 3rd roster spot on a kicker. they might do it in desperation if a player is injured, or there kicker has NO leg, and is only accurate at less than 45 yards. the kickoff kicker, would also come in to try the very long FGs. it would be a good ST player and help our ST, if we could get a lot more touchbacks.

got the wrong D, but otherwise its good.

yeah... "hes injured". i dont buy that. but the colts didnt go to harrison much at all liek they should when they saw POOLE on harrison.

im with you on that one. 3 turn overs on there own freakin 2 yard lines. then how does a kicker who hasnt missed in like 2 years, miss so badly to loose the game?? how do you get sacked 15 yards on a 3 step drop with 30 seconds left and down by 3?? how do you let brady go 60 yards in 30 seconds befor half time with no timeouts to get a field goal?? again... how do you fumble on your 1 yard line on first down ???? why were all the recievers WIDE open?? not just open, but WIDE open. noone within 5 -10 yards most of the time? why cant you get SOME pressure on brady?? there DEs kept on slipping at his feet and take them selves out of the game...... James had 80+ yards at half time, and they didnt run much in the second... WHY??? 9 plays for 70 yards, all runs, ending in a TD!!!! god i hate the pats, but now im starting to think the colts have no D, and should not be allowed talked about like superbowl contenders. the pats cant stop the run, and the colts cant stop the pass. both have good Offense, but there D will cost them games. neather looked like superbowl teams. playoffs yes, super bowl no. also, the eagles will look exactly like the pats offence, and the colts defense. passing all over the place, while getting passed on also.

probubly a clements INT, or a fumble recovery after a sack. who knows who falls on that one.

i didnt know that. 20,000 cash. http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=1877576

cus Evans has shown us SO much this preseason, we should make him the starter. if anything Reed HAS shown us something. he wont be spectacular, but right not hes the better choice.

yep, i read it was like 75 wins. i bet he looses, by betting it all on the last question and misses it.

all good.

well, we expect him to get 12 sacks this year, maybe more. and with the amount other DEs have gotten in the off season, a DE who can consistantly get 10+ sacks costs alot in FA. hes young, and can pass rush, as well as tackle. he has increased in sacks every year he has been in the league. hes not a DE that got 16 sacks his first year, and hasnt done anything since ("the freak" for example). he got paid a good amount, but not to much, and we expect him to be there for a long time.

targeting the 18-23 year old, videogame playing males.

pat is getting up in years, and has little pass rush abilty. that said, he is a beast in the run D. we need this guy. maybe he will sign a low cap hit, high insentive contract.... that would be awsome. but i dont see that happening untill next offseason. jennings keeps getting injured, so he hasnt been able to show his ability the past few years. hes a good solid OT, and a keeper, but with the money other OTs are getting, i dout he will take a cap friendly contract. i say sign him if hes asking for a resonable price, but otherwise, hit the market for a good OT. the way its looking there shoudl be 2 probowlers out next offseason, if we are willing to pay 7-8 mil a year for them...

http://www.nfl.com/index?afceastrbs_9804 who the hell thinks dillan will have a better year than henry. ok, McGahee will get some carries, but bothing dillan showed me in preseason says he will do anything more than 1100 yards at most this season. henry will probubly get 1250+ (if he starts all the games.) the pats are a passing offence, and will run as a change of pace, "keep them honest" type of running game. 15-17 carries a game, for 65-70 yards. thats all.

hell yeah now only Williams and jennings left to sign

he sucks. WAY overrated. remember just 2 years ago, he was considered one of the top CBs in the league, just cus he played for the giants. its really sad, when you get the league minimum and are still considered overrated.

thanks, that one works..

sound good, but i cant get that link to work....