Richard Noggin

Commendable work overall with respect to music and splicing, but repetition of the same two device throws wears out quickly.

That's sexual assault from my perspective. No ambiguity. Coincidentally, Antonio Brown was accused of basically the same exact thing, and unsurprisingly, did not receive much in the way of NFL punishment for that (as far as I know).

All of the ELITE QBs you've mentioned here are smaller than Allen, and at least two have less arm talent and at least two are less gifted runners. Therefore, they are ALL less "talented," despite being awesome. Cam Newton and John Elway are maybe the closest physical comps? Newton has the size and athleticism but not quite the arm. Elway has the early career running and arm strength, but not quite the size. Maybe Randall Cunningham should be mentioned?

Okay, Mr. Weo. Mr. Weo, okay. But hitting on Josh Allen at #7 DOES have us looking back and saying "yeah [and] they got Edmunds, T Johnson, Neal and (you lump together/dismiss the SOLID picks that moved on or were moved to) other teams' rosters."

Goodnight, moon

So sweet of the landlord to apologize to the fanatic squatters he's been caring for.

I love the reliable ebb and flow of the bulls and bears on this board. Set my serotonin clock to it.

Soldiering isn't an individual competition, you absolute chucklehead. It's the ultimate TEAM sport. Risking one's own wellbeing for the protection/benefit of the larger whole is, in fact, ELITE SOLDIERING. And I'm usually the last person to celebrate warfare. But your take, wow...truly embarrassing.

More a case of a couple false steps than it is a bad angle. He had contain but bit to the inside and then couldn't recover. Sometimes you have to be willing to let someone else overpay...even if it hurts in the short term...

Josh Allen three years ago?

I get why fans love it, and why it's a great look for the org.

This is probably a popular opinion, and one that I agree with. A 31-year old Jordan Poyer might not be worth a TOP dollar safety money extension, given the full context of the roster and cap. And that seems like a smart position: the Bills can't keep paying TOP dollar to BOTH safeties without sacrificing elsewhere. Too much of a luxury when you've already got a Josh Allen and a Stefon Diggs and a Tre White and a Von Miller and a Matt Milano, etc. The problem with this sober, logical approach to cap allocation moving forward, is that Poyer might force the issue sooner rather than later. Letting him play out his current deal is probably what most Bills fans/execs would prefer, but that seems to be an unlikely option. Poyer showing up to minicamp was apparently predicated upon some kind of good faith negotiations and assurances. The Bills either work out SOME kind of expensive extension/raise, or they suddenly have a hole/distraction at SS. Bottom line.

I think we DO know what caused Moss to fall out of favor: he wasn't a good fit as the Bills rushing attack moved away from zone blocking schemes down the stretch last season. Throughout his tenure, McDermott has wanted the Bills to be a primarily zone-based rushing offense (more specifically outside zone), evidenced by his early hires (Dennison et al) and by his most recent hires (and interviews), but not previously matched by the personnel dept (too many subpar athletes on the OL to run it effectively). I commend them for adapting last year to the pin-and-pull and more gap-based approach that the line could actually execute at a high level. Aside from Kromer, the Bills interviewed OL coach candidates who were all proponents of zone blocking (and again, wide zone specifically). Moss fits into this organizational desire to run that kind of offense. I think, with two years remaining on his rookie deal, and a potentially better fit, he gets more time.

Not unlike partisan politics and the 24 hour news cycle. When there are only two "teams," there isn't a lot of room for nuance. I actually think that Mayfield, when healthy, IS in fact a decent NFL starter who can show flashes of high end production. I also think that he came into the league pretty darned close to his ceiling, so there isn't much room for growth. (And did himself NO favors playing through the shoulder injury last year; funny how he gets very little praise for being a gamer.) Kind of like Tua, but with an actual NFL arm. Tua is out here trying to succeed in the 2022 NFL with 2010 Chad Pennington's arm. He's better than his physical traits indicate (like Mayfield), but ultimately capped.

Admittedly I'm underinformed on the entirety of the Watson saga, but didn't the PLAYER refuse to play again for his team last year (like prior (just barely) to the emergence of these allegations and consequent lawsuits)? Didn't he essentially allow the NFL to NOT make any difficult decisions on his availability last season? I could be missing important info (often am). But under my recollection of events, there is ZERO case for any "time served" considerations. Only post I hadn't yet read when I replied. Also my understanding of how it played out last year, of course.

The ship has sailed on the "jailed" part of this preferred consequence equation. All we can hope for now, if we care about consequences for heinous actions, is significant short term financial penalties, medium term professional punishments, and lasting personal stigma. It's not ideal, but when dealing with the ultra rich and famous, it's about as good as it's going to get.

I'll ask: what does kidney cleansing have to do with BP? I'm NOT asking about your personal results while using a specific product, to be clear (anecdotal evidence is flimsy especially with one-offs). I'm asking if there are clinically studied benefits of such products with respect to blood pressure. And I'm not asking to be a jerk.

I mean, this doesn't HELP his chances to make the final 53, right?

This is the opposite of how the Bengals frustrated the Chiefs, for the record. But the Bengals could effectively pressure the passer rushing only four. A talented 4-man pass rush could THRIVE with this Buffalo pass defense behind it (players and coaches). It's been the missing piece, despite efforts to the contrary.

How would we classify an NFL HC who reports directly to ownership (so on-par or slightly above Beane in the organizational flow chart)? Is McDermott the functional CEO? Probably here in Buffalo he is. And Beane is the CFO/COO. I'd think in other, more vertical orgs, the President/Vice President/top Exec is the CEO while the GM is the CFO and the HC is the COO. It's not a 1:1 analogy between disparate companies, but it's interesting to compare NFL organizational flow charts. As a long-term approach to work/life balance, "sleeping in the office" is a very American, unhealthy behavior. But as a 5-20 year approach to being a TOP exec trying to grow and maintain a successful corporate culture, it makes sense. Sean McDermott has this amazing shot at RUNNING AN NFL ORGANIZATION. He had some initial success piloting a previous regime's company, and has now had even more success after completely overhauling the org according to his own vision. THIS is his best shot at realizing his ambitions. Many of us encounter windows of opportunity deserving of short-term work/life sacrifices. Almost NONE of us reach the absolute pinnacle of our fields (which I'm arguing deserve increased sacrifice in order to best maximize the opportunity). Oh, and he's making millions annually doing what he is obsessed with. It's just such a unique circumstance.

Super false. Maybe BOTH sentences lol.

No, it isn't. But it's not their faults. Ranch is ubiquitous where most of them come from. An American tragedy.

Above all, though, for me, is the embarrassing reminder of how the Bills were doing business towards the end of Ralph Wilson's ownership: instead of Cash ABOVE Cap as discussed in this interview, the Bills were openly utilizing Cash TO Cap accounting. That's a SEISMIC competitive self-handicapping. Like it only becomes FULLY apparent in light of more contemporary cap management strategies just HOW disadvantageous such a practice was. Holy heck.

It's all true, this oversimplification, it's all true IF IF IF you don't move on from players on big bonus-heavy deals who have more than one season remaining. That proration does sting when guys don't play out their deals until at least the penultimate season. Eating one year of spread-out bonus happens all the time. But eating two or even three years, combined with other cap constraints, can eat up the available "accounting" in ways that often require tough decisions, and/or necessitate continued back-loading of deals. A team can kick-the-can on smart deals without worry (although the randomness of NFL injuries adds uncertainty even here). Weren't the Saints mentioned as an example of how this does NOT catch up to orgs? Haven't they had to take some personnel lumps in order to correct the books a bit? (Of course combining such tough decisions WITH the *ahem unrelated losses of HC and QB makes it seem inevitable.)

Was there signing bonus involved for this guy? Because if so, then maybe a fringe rookie prospect in that situation might have never intended to play in the NFL, but was willing to stick with it long enough for a nice paycheck of 5 or even 6 figures? Remember, these big dudes, especially, experience repeated, necessary physical trauma in the course of a season. Once the pads go on in camp, the violence really kicks up a notch. Maybe a guy has the size/athleticism to be a rookie invite/UDFA signing, but not the desire to be an NFL lineman in full pads? Just a thought.