Richard Noggin

To piggyback off Logic and Shaw, in particular, when watching and discussing preseason this year, I kept boiling it down to: the Bills were better than their competition. In all four (meaningless) games, the Bills were better enough to win. Same with the first two weeks of this regular season: barely better enough + much better = 2-0. They look like a solid team this season. Nay, a solid FRANCHISE. They look competently assembled, schemed, and executed. It's refreshing.

This just helps to magnify their contrived Us-Against-The World schtick. Except that these days, rather than simply pretending the world is against them, the world is, in fact, against the Patriots and their institutional unethical behavior.

Now I know more. Thank you.

The More You Know...(insert flying star PSA gif here)

The TNF college game between Tulane and Houston has been bonkers in the 4th quarter. In a good way. (Pivotal fake kneel down with teams tied and game clock under half a minute, for starters).

Someone explain to me why some Bills fans are expressing anger or derision AT Kroft himself for getting injured again? He probably didn't do it on purpose.

I don't know. Just thought I'd isolate this quote. No reason.

Patriots. And it's not very close. I say again, as a Bills fan and appreciator of McD's defense: the Patriots have a much better defense.

Isn't the key to this game (and most others) scoring points quickly enough on offense to alter the opposing offense's play-calling (as they fall behind)? Nudge the opponent to become more one-dimensional on their own... I know last week played out opposite of this narrative, but let's face it: we won't get away with clusters-of-turnovers and first-half bagels in most games. Score early and often to neutralize the bootlegs and play-actions that WCOs (like Shurmur's) thrive on. The Giants looked good on offense early against the Cowboys, but that didn't last in part because the Cowboys put them in a hole early. Can't let them execute a balanced timing offense predicated on the threat of Barkley. Gotta cut their playbook in half.

You poor dear. Pray for us. I don't jump through tables, but I also don't get my undies in a bunch over the whole national perception thing. Just enjoy your team, and enjoy others enjoying the team. It's supposed to be fun.

But hey, that's showbiz, baby.

So wait...they BOTH suck?

So basically: "Show me the baby"?

I lived in Orlando in 2004 when we caught 4 monsters in a matter of weeks. To be completely honest, it was an invigorating experience. The week without power after Charley, in that heat/humidity, was brutal. But overall, it was an indelible time in my life. Of course, I hope everyone stays safe.

I treat my own like I hate it. So, no.

Oh, mykidsdad

I saw this as well. Great in traffic. Not so much in space.

err...Foster made a great play as gunner for a punt. Probably a really important tackle for his immediate future on the Bills, given that they dressed him precisely for STs evaluation. (maybe someone already commented on this point, and if so, apologies. But seriously? Pay attention, my friend.)

A lack of the emboldened is what concerned me about his rookie season. Chicago's rookie did it a couple-two-tree times. Indy's rookie did it, too. Edmunds, not so much. Edmunds looked to me like a smart, freakishly athletic kid who was starting from scratch. More an athlete than a football player. Which is potentially troubling for such a necessarily violent position. Maybe he is maturing and learning fast enough to add impact and collision to his game this season. The plays covered in that vid show some progress on that front. Let's hope it continues...

While on one level I agree with you and the majority of posters on this thread...that Allen is looking more composed and decisive and accurate...we shouldn't completely lose sight of the context: neither Carolina nor Indy sent pressure packages or disguised their coverages much. A first-team offense/starting QB SHOULD enjoy success under those circumstances. And again, don't misunderstand me: it's very encouraging to see the Bills finally execute a modern passing attack. It bodes well. Our own D is winning its battles using vanilla schemes. But defenses will play Allen much differently in the regular season. I'm curious how well Allen will diagnose and react to different pressures and coverages.

Who else thinks Feliciano is a beast who can be a starter at this level? For some reason I'm not as worried as I should be about Morse. First of all, he'll be back on the field any day now. Second of all, the Bills have contingency plans in case their starting center can't play. Feliciano is big and mean. Long can back up in the pivot. But the way Feliciano rallied to support whichever WR got hit out of bounds in the first quarter, getting right up in the defender's face...it showed a lot. He's part of the team's plans moving forward. Of course let's hope Morse is able to play this season without complications from yet another concussion. But other NFL players have persevered through such histories; Luke Keuchly, for example, is a guy who has garnered mucho attention for head injuries in the past, but is not currently viewed as a high risk guy (by Bills fans, at least).

So...what you're saying is it does NOT take time?

I think you're clearly talking about his tangibles here, yes?

He's not all-anything because he just played his first organized football game tonight. I don't know how well he catches, or picks up blitzers, or performs any of the other nuanced tasks NFL RBs need to master. But he runs well and secures the ball.

It's true what you say. Isn't it ironic? Don't you think?