Richard Noggin

Allen has entered a tier of elite play, and done so on big stages, consistently now since last season's playoffs. The fact that against LA he picked up right where he left off against KC and NE means that Allen has been playing at a previously/historically unseen level for at least 3 straight, high-stakes, primetime games. It's real. That's actually who he is. Josh Allen is now consistently ELITE. Herbert ain't quite there yet. Not sure if anyone else, but Mahomes, is on that level right now.

There is actually ZERO evidence of this. Him trying to go back in in the 2nd half last week, combined with him working off to the side, albeit gingerly, today = NOT a high ankle sprain. Get rekt.

Which of course speaks to the argument (made by you, I think, as well me and some others) that Kupp would not necessarily flourish on the Bills as easily as Diggs would flourish on the Rams. Doesn't diminish him at all, as he's clearly effing awesome. But the Bills simply do NOT skew their entire passing offense to repeatedly getting one WR favorable looks against safeties and linebackers and slot CBs. I know fans like when the Rams scheme for Kupp to get open by design (results in big numbers), and for example now the Vikings suddenly/finally repeatedly scheme for Jefferson to get open against LBs and safeties like 60% of his snaps (results in even bigger numbers for that freak WR). But if an offense can still get high-end production out of its #1 WR withOUT such deliberate play design, thereby creating more options/outlets for the QB on each play no matter how the defense plays coverage, doesn't that make sustained success more likely? In short, I like the Bills offensive approach.

You keep coming back with strong counter arguments utilizing detailed evidence. Nice work. I STILL want Tremaine to get low and take on the widest pulling lineman, creating a little scrum there which could have helped Milano as he engaged the ball carrier. (Have this image i can't shake of Mike Vrabel, of all hated players, on a wode goalline rush, essentially planting a knee on the playside edge of the line and stoning a pulling lineman's progress, thereby jamming up traffic and allowing his teammates to rally to the ball. I know that's not Edmunds's game, but with his size I wish it was when the occasion calls for it.)

In the spirit of fellowship, the Bills DID successfully use Edmunds in this kind of 4-3 "over" alignment against the 49ers a couple of years back. (The game where Josh really broke out as a passer on primetime TV (that laser over Warner to the in-breaking Gabriel Davis).) In that game, Edmunds often lined up out on the strongside edge, and was replaced in the middle by Klein. I don't remember any impact plays from that position, but I do remember the Bills stifling the Shanahan attack and winning the game.

Absolutely effing NOT. Leverage and physicality at the point of attack are the weakest parts of the Tremaine Edmunds skillset. He is a shite blitzer, and does not effectively get underneath blockers. We've seen it in games for years now. His measurables and college experience continue to lure fans into thinking he has the potential to slide to the edge. Alas, he does not.

Maybe "just do[ing] his job" is the issue we often have with our MLB. You'd love for him to trust Poyer's decisive adjustment and cheat left to where the defense is going to be outflanked otherwise. As fans we do NOT know what was communicated there, but upon further review of the play, Edmunds DID shift to his left a bit as Poyer directed. I do not enjoy crusading against players on the Bills. I want them all to succeed. On this play, however, the MLB fails. It happens even to better players. The real issue looks to be post-snap: Edmunds initially takes 2 or 3 steps BACKWARDS, and then, he simply overruns the play (the edge was another player's responsibility to contain). If he isn't going to undercut the blocking and disrupt the play before it gets started (which he can't do if his fist steps are backwards), he then absolutely must STONE one of the lead blockers to give his teammates more time to rally. Taron Johnson effectively outflanks/attacks the edge, so what Edmunds does is redundant and useless. Milano actually almost makes the stop from even FURTHER to the backside of the play; would have helped to have a 250lb freak LB hold his ground with Havenstein right where Milano makes contact. Only needed ONE more player to help him stop the ball carrier's upfield progress.

I think most fans see the wisdom in reducing #40's career snap count trends and keeping him fresh all season (and for several seasons more). I'll share another reason that is pure rumor, but does originate from sources I sort of trust: a partner in the medical practice that does all the Bills screenings/imagings got overserved this summer and started carrying on about what a bad investment Von Miller was based on the condition of his knees. Incredibly unwise of this fairly esteemed doctor to share confidential medical information, and especially unwise to do so for a client like the Buffalo Bills. But the sharing DID happen. Whether it was accurately represented, or embellished, I can't ever know. But this medical expert thought the Bills were foolish to invest long-term in an athlete with such "old" and "deteriorated" knees. Not a lot of cartilage left, apparently. I wonder how many veteran players would be similarly seen as high-risk based on their medicals? Maybe most of them?

I've found that planning ahead is how people lose survivor pools. Your job is to survive THIS week. Most of these pools don't last long past the midpoint of the season. There are enough matchups to exploit each week. No reason to go out on a limb right out of the gate. (Of course the payoff is nice, being able to select those teams later, BUT when will Denver or Baltimore have a better matchup than week one?)

I'm thinking in my suicide pool that the Ravens over the Jets is a solid pick. I think Lamar will go after each game like he's always done. I'm also thinking that many people will pick the Broncos over the Seahawks, for a multitude of reasons. Any thoughts?

Dane is clearly CB2 on this team when Tre White is healthy. Neither Benford nor Elam are challenging him for snaps at this time. However, Tre White is NOT yet game healthy, so the platooning of Elam and Benford is impactful on a game-to-game basis. They have different physical traits and different skillsets and fluencies. Ideally, by season's end, both rookie corners have gained enough seasoning to be relied upon no matter the play call or matchup. We know our coaches are ELITE developers of secondary talent. It will be fascinating to see how the CB snap counts unfold in 2022/23.

I did intend to timestamp the video. Alas, I failed. I appreciate being taken to task in an objective way as you're doing here. Honestly, though, Edmunds does NOT, to my eye, sell-out on Poyer's pre-snap read the way he could/should have. His eyes were still a bit elsewhere momentarily. Obviously his keys were telling him something a bit different. I was yelling about it as it unfolded in real time. Of course it's not ALL his fault by any means. But he was maybe the only guy who could have disrupted the play, and it seems obvious Poyer realized that right before the snap.

I TRIED with the timestamp! Such things are difficult for an idiot like me, unfortunately.

Feeling compelled to call attention to a player who many are overlooking (often for good reasons): DaQuan Jones #92. He could actually be everything we were told Star was supposed to be. #92 flashed a bunch for me.

In the spirit of objective diligence, and not to hijack a thread, blame for this LA 4th down conversion seems to start with a certain maligned MLB, given Poyer's very explicit pre-snap alert that falls on deaf ears (or feet)... (At the last moment, Poyer recognizes the pre-snap look and tries to alert Edmunds to the imminent WR screen to his left, but the MLB does NOT shift left or even take his first step(s) in that direction, thereby causing him to be just a step too late to make the play. It seems clear to me, but I'm sure many will disagree. And that's...okay.)

Is this board satire? If so, bravo.

What the ***** did I just read

The back shoulder 3rd down conversion to Diggs with Ramsey playing press was my personal favorite.

You sleep after a Bills win? Weirdo. Anyways, shoutout to DaQuan Jones! Looked stout and even brought a little heat against the pass. Def caused Stafford's first INT.

Missed a huge opportunity to sing "Blue Light" instead of just "Blue"...it would have rhymed perfectly AND been more accurate for people who intentionally drink more than a dozen beers before kickoff, which is no small segment of fans. Blue Light happens to be only 20 calories and like 1.5 carbs less per can, so turns out you better be hitting double digits to make the sacrifice even remotely worthwhile. I am just finding this out now. Useful info, that.

Easy to be funny at the START of 2022. But how many of you were funny at the END of [insert any year 2000-2010]?

Lotta sales and money managers...which tracks for the pressure and visibility of the gig. But do we really want the refs to be competitive A-types? It's the old conundrum of whether we should trust those in positions of authority because we've all seen people who seek such authority.

Daboll seemed to be stubbornly loyal to his weekly game-plans. Luckily, he devised a lot of good plans to attack opposing defenses. The problems arose when for whatever reason those plans didn't work. I can remember too many games where Daboll failed to help his offensive linemen, especially, win their matchups due to repetitive or predictable play-calling. That week one Pittsburgh game last year, just dropping back repeatedly and letting some gifted Pitt specimens tee off on a middling group of protectors. Daryl Williams and Cody Ford and Ike Boettger need a little help against the likes of Watt, Heyward, Ingram, etc. I've always envied more intuitive play callers, who have a more consistent system and set of packages and plays they rely on. Have a plan, but feel the game more. Respond to what IS happening on the field, rather than what you predicted SHOULD happen on the field. Marry the run and the pass more fundamentally so that plays look the same and defenders have less idea what's coming.

Diggs has fewer plays designed to get HIM open quickly as a product of bunches and picks and motions and et cetera. Diggs plays a more traditional X role more often than Kupp does. Right on the line, out wide, releasing and running routes. Working against presses and brackets and doubles and buzzes and et cetera. Kupp gets a lot of defensive attention, no doubt, but there's more scheming designed to disrupt that attention and get him the ball nonetheless. Methinks the Bills have sought to play it slightly more "straight-up" so that extra attention paid to Diggs opens up other favorable matchups. Or, conversely, a lack of extra coverage attention means Diggs sees the ball, a lot. In theory.

Maybe they're downplayed because of what BuffBart is sharing anecdotally here: meniscus tears CAN be fairly minor. They can also be fairly significant. I'm pretty sure I had an undiagnosed tear a handful of years back; no health insurance at the time, and the pain was mostly manageable except when I went DOWN stairs. I was still able to run and do some training that didn't involve squats or lunges or the sort. Sharp pain lasted 4-6 weeks. Who really knows how many weekend warrior soft tissue injuries come and go in the shadows of the American healthcare system...