ROCBillsBeliever

(Mind of deluded mock drafter): "Hmm... let me see... team I know nothing about... ESPN says they need D line help... woman team president... God-fearing coach... I know... They will pick the lady-beater DT I heard about from the internet!" ?????????

I only worry about being sued. More concerned with staring down ol googley-eyes Gase in a court of law than the financial blowback ? He's creepy!

??? I'm printing tees. Who's buying? Priceless!

I heard they found a mosquito that once bit McVay. From what I hear, he's good at getting in a QB's ear.

We will not know whether or not he has UNTIL the Bills win one ???

CSM, my dude... he screwed us, back in the 90's:

Thanks for the voice of reason! In what sort of f#*$%@ math does RB#3 on a college team = NFL pick #9?

I really hope that, years from now, people look back on last year's draft as a defining (and positive) turning point in the Buffalo Bill's history.

I'm sold on the idea ?

Given the state of affairs in Miami and The Meadowlands, I cannot argue with you on that.

Part of me agrees, completely! Another part of me thinks that having Palmer work with Allen outside of the allotted timeframe provided by the CBA is incredibly more valuable. Just take a look at how restrictive the CBA really is: https://www.nflpa.com/active-players/off-season-rules Any extra, McCoach-approved tutelage under a well-respected guide like Palmer is icing, baby; pure icing. And it circumvents the CBA, legally.

I actually do NOT want this to happen. We need the Chiefs to dethrone the Pats, and not disintegrate, the way the Bills' D did under Rexy.

The real question is, who's going to sign big, bad #69 to their PS? Michael Jasper's gonna win them a ring!

I love how, in the OP's article, it mentions that Gronk, and I quote, "elbowed" Tre White... E-L-B-O-W-E-D Patsie apologists abound in the media...

Oh, Sully White Shoes, Pretend Time is over; you can come out and be Sully, now. Thanks.

I agree, at the moment... But I think back to when Bills fans gave Marquis Goodwin the moniker "Glass". WR styles are like politics: one election swings right, and the people eventually get pissed; next election comes, and they swing left; then they get disappointed and swing back... ad infinitum. I jut want somebody who can catch the ball. Is that too much to ask? I think we drafted Zay with that in mind (CFB record for career receptions), but he got the yips (year 1), then came down with a nasty case of the Peterman-and-journeymen-are-passing-me-the-footballs (part of year two).

I scope out a lot of mock drafts, and we keep being paired with DK Metcalf. NOT impressed... The numbers: Receiving & Rushing Receiving Rushing Scrimmage Year School Conf Class Pos G Rec Yds Avg TD Att Yds Avg TD Plays Yds Avg TD Career Ole Miss 67 1228 18.3 14 0 0 0 67 1228 18.3 14 2016 Ole Miss SEC FR WR 2 2 13 6.5 2 0 0 0 2 13 6.5 2 2017 Ole Miss SEC FR WR 12 39 646 16.6 7 0 0 0 39 646 16.6 7 2018 Ole Miss SEC SO WR 7 26 569 21.9 5 0 0 0 26 569 21.9 5 Also, neck injury... Hello, Eric Wood... Don't want to lose a valuable player and draft position due to injury. How do those numbers garner a #9 pick? Either 1) the national mock authors are idiots, 2) they think we are idiots, or 3) they see a need at WR and just plug in the name they hear a whole lot of draft talk about. Also would pass on Noah Fant, TE - Iowa. Saw his snaps decreasing; mentions by coaches of "lack of desire." Smells like Benjamin at the TE position...

Facts: Peterman Taylor Anderson All threw many passes to Zay. Fact: All threw many bad passes.

With a few joints hanging out of the intake thermocoupling ???

But we have to get him in the 6th round, McBeane... 6th... NOT the 5th round. #petermanneverforget

Dear, sweet Baby Jesus... 1) You exist. 2) You've been listening. 3) Thanks.

Julian....

Wide right Thanks. I appreciate it. It appears some folks in here are capable of applying logic.

By saying that I can put ranch on wings, I'm implying that anyone can do that, BUT they'd be wrong. Its implied sarcasm, but I'm done. If that flew over your head, then I can see why you would also miss such nuanced occurances as miss blown holding calls, or the result thereof: of the 10+ blown calls against Hughes this season, if 5 led to sacks, he would be considered elite. I really can't argue with you, if you can't read sarcasm, or understand what I meant by the ranch on wings comment. You missed that; you miss clearly blown calls. You miss, sir. You miss. I'm done.

You are putting words in my mouth. I never said leaguewide conspiracy. I watch every game, and every game, Hughes is held, repeatedly. There is no denying that. Also, the NFL realized it cannot support refs who cannot make fair judgements, because they badmouth players, and turn their heads when they are blatantly being held. That's also been proven, by the NFL's decision to suspend that particular ref. If you want to call those two points a crazy conspiracy theory, you sure well can. I can call ranch the right thing to put on wings...