PrimeTime101

angle the stadium properly so just the visiting side gets the most snow.

you know what this is going to remind me off? When Mario Williams took off plays.. remember that? a player knows exactly how much they have left in the tank and they will stretch every cent of it.

the only thing is, the fans don't like how early he announces this. so anytime he has a bad play, Hill will be questioned "is his heart in it" "Are we now going to get proper value out of him?"

Its refreshing to see someone post something that is well thought out. Scouting as much as I do *watching all kinds of video and reading many scout reports", I will copy the names and give you quick thought. Jose Ramirez, EDGE, Eastern Michigan 4th round grade I actually think as some other scouts do, feel he will slip to early round 5. The reason is, there is limited tape on this guy playing against elite players. IF he fell to 5, I would take a chance on Jose. Darius Rush, Cornerback, South Carolina 2nd round grade I think Rush defiantly goes round 2. maybe even early. For a team that plays lots of zone and not man press, I think his potential is #1B CB or Strong #2 CB. He avoided the shuttle like the plague and I think that is the only reason he is slipping in round 2... and yes.. that is what makes him a sleeper. Bryce Ford-Wheaton, Wide Receiver, West Virginia 5th round grade I did not see much on him so I will hold thoughts. Jalen Graham, Linebacker, Purdue 5th round grade Did not scout but Denver may be in the market for a late round LB and this is a great write up on him https://www.si.com/nfl/broncos/draft/dorian-williams-tulane-jeremy-banks-tennessee-scouting-report Trey Dean III, Safety, Florida 4th round grade You are spot on right that he would fit in a dime system really well. Jordan Mims, Running Back, Fresno State 6th/7th round grade Don't scoun late round RB's cause they all start to look the same Chandler Zavala, Guard, North Carolina State 3rd round grade I LOVE this pick. could be our future Center. really good work sir!

LOL

You know what he just did? He basically said this... "Yea I will retire after this contract is up. I can relax and not go all out now because either way? who cares. I will get paid" seriously no player does this, this far in advanced.

and by the way, just because your mad at people that they dislike or as you put it "ignorant" vomiters does not mean they can't put a vomit on your post. it is THAIR RIGHT to have an opinion and its not fair you use the word ignorant in front of it.

while others think its so obvious MAhomes Bills would win over JA Chiefs... I am on board with you on this one.

your joking right?

So tell me... if we flipped mahomes to this roster and Josh Allen to KC roster? what team would win? a Mahomes with Bills roster or a Allen with KC roster?

That is a fair answer though I think most would say no way in heck. cheers

would this be the case if KC did not have a dude named Kelce?

no where on here does it say position of value equates to how much they make on here. What they are saying here and I quote "But the concept of “BPA” is fairly trite and actually absurd in practice." To this point the writer is right. Then they go on and talk about Wins above replacement (war) again.. nothing to do with how a team values a position going into a draft. Then the article goes into Cap implications by drafting a player.. This is positional WORTH not value. No where in that article do they mention positional value. (other than title) The first Paragraph reads "NFL GMs often describe drafting the “best player available” — deferring to their draft boards and letting the draft come to them. But the concept of “BPA” is fairly trite and actually absurd in practice. Adhering to such a standard is how you draft a kicker in the second round or a running back No. 2 overall. In an abstract sense, both may have been the best talents relative to their positions at that moment in the draft. But football isn’t played in the abstract, and the very real concept of positional value cannot be ignored when building a team. While having a complete roster looks great on paper, the fact of the matter is that not all positions are created equal." BOLDED that is what I have been saying all along. To the second bolded, positions are not created equal do to their need on that team. EVERYTHING I have been saying. Now.. when they go to the draft.. Yes they look at money that will be spent in the future with how much they already will spend? yes.. absolutly but yet.. no where in those paragraphs does it say "position of value". "Salary camp implications" and "positional drafting" have nothing to do with "positional value" What this article is saying is there is a lot more involved than just one set of numbers. Future Cap Implications, War and positional need all factor into "positional value" yet... in your quote earlier you just tried compare cap implications to position of value.. WRONG... there is way more involved.. even above what this article does not talk about.. more specifically need. Next time you link us something, read the whole article and not just one part and call us "For ignorant vomiters:" As I said earlier.. BPA in general is a myth but when many on these boards use the letters BPA, they put value, need, cap implications ALL of it into the conversation. Anyone that says we should draft Best Player Available and ignore the rest is wrong. LIKE i been saying and others too.

positional value = need. teams give their own personal value on positions due to need. but yea I agree... It has not changed on these boards for years. still won't. Bottom line, people have the right to think what they want... right, wrong or indifferent. is what it is you know I am on board with you on this.

none of the above

I am not sure you are getting it Chaos. Some people think BPA what ever the best player is on the board YOU TAKE! others think of BPA is Best Player Available at Value... and that is how they really draft. They have a value at every position at every level of the draft. where as Round 1 is highest value is WR for example so there might be a say a HB there that is slightly better than a WR, then they will still go WR cause of the value they have on that position in that round. Others think BPA in that same example you should take the HB because he is slightly better. Its train of thought of what BPA means to people and again here I am another year before another draft, explaining this all over again.. for the second time this year. Thats why you got the dislikes and the pukes on your OP.

Ok House.. I am going to play this different. I did a lot of mid-round scouting this year.. Lets try this. Player # 1 Demarvion Overshown LB, Texas Round 3 Player # 2 Luke Schoonmaker, TE, Michigan Round 4

seriously, what does he expect to get for him? a 4th rounder backup at best? when i hear the word shopped, to me its someone talented that many want.. Mac Jones is a really good backup qb . low tier starter at best.

they said the same exact thing in the Hockenson draft, same thing i heard in the Freiermuth draft not so long ago.... so yea..

ha ha you go with that.

Kelce type player? you kidding me? lol the Gronks and the Kelce's come once every 10 years or so.. the question is just stupid captain obvious, so I am bored, and I am going to see who bites type of question... WR... OBVIOUSLY lol

lol

no.

I think where McD will improve this defense (or hope he improves) is solid play by play situational awareness and aggressiveness where/when needed. for example,, how many times did we complain that we did not blitz enough against rookie QB's over the last 3 years... I think McD will do better in these areas. Here's for hoping. Cheers

31 year old won't mess up the comps yep Me either