PrimeTime101

the question you need to ask is.. if he is all of what hock is.. and they look the same, why was knox not used in slot more often? wow man. never said he did. now your stuffing words in my mouth?

you said big te not big slot. fact is Knox could have been used in the slot more, and they are the same size. the point being is using the term big. the rest i agree i recant that. you did say big slot. point being is there is no reason Knox could not of played in the slot more because he was big. he compares to hoc

never said he did.. go back and read.. i was referring to the big te comment NOT THE SAME SIZE? did you read any of what i posted? all 4 are within 1 inch and 11 pounds of each other. THAT is a bad narrative.

Sir with all do respect, you need to stop with these awful narratives He is not a big slot? Knox 6'4 254 Kelce 6'5 250 Kincaid 6'4 246 Andrews 6'5 256 Stop it lol... All 4 of these guys are within 1 inch and 11 pounds man,,, stop with your awful narratives to prove a point... Now.. to the point of receiving skill? I agree. Though i find it FUNNY that you drag Hock into this conversation saying Knox could be as productive as hock Both players.. played.. yep.. EXACTLY 57 games.. Knox total yards and TD? 1780/20 Targets 230 Avg. 11 Hock total yards and TD? 2587/18 Targets 373 Avg 10.5 They essentially already are the same player.. ACCEPT! Hock has more targets and slightly less drops over his career. Overall ? I agree with most of what you have said.. but don't let one bad narrative roll into another.

oh my....

I am going to have fun watching him this year... for a TE? there is no bone in my body that tells me he is slow.

Did Kincaid look faster than advertised for you guys?

It's my opinion

Dorsey watched how a really good TE was used at Carolina. I do not think Dorsey will be an issue as much as people think.

First Bolded I agree. That too... To the second bolded? For me? We got way better on offense. I am confident.

For me this is not even a real topic. 2 years ago we had a bad offensive line but good targets. Last year we had a bad offensive line and no targets. What ya think they would do? Now we have an "average" (and I am ok with saying around 15th best OL} With actual target that you can get rid of the ball quick. This topic for me is a no brainer. We needed to get better on the Line and Targets. We did it. Moving on.

LOL Gag Jank Vile? IDK...

oh look... a mod sighting.... I can't wait either... see you in another 129 days.. cough.

This ***** Place... @teef for you Troll, You can make your silent exit now... thank you. yea.. this was for me

Just read below I am going to say this... If they WANTED Edmunds? They would have moved every dime they could to keep them. I personally do not think the value was there for what he got paid for. I will say the exact same thing for Davis NEXT year. IF you guys want to quote what Beane said PROPERLY... This is what he said quote un quote with link. " "I want to pay them all ... the ones that deserve it and have earned it," Beane said in a press conference. "and there's other guys here that I feel have earned it as well and ... there's guys that have left here since I've been here that I wanted to pay or our organization wanted to pay. But you can't pay them all. "And that's hard, because I'm a people person. I love these guys and love them to death, but I also have a job to do and I have rules to follow from a cap standpoint and cash. And so unfortunately you have to say goodbye to someone. https://www.si.com/nfl/bills/news/bills-brandon-beane-we-cant-pay-everyone Now that being said... Beane is never going to come out in a pressor and say "Edmunds would not of been worth what we wanted to pay". NEVER would any GM go out and say that... and @BADOLBILZ, You need to understand what Beane says is not always face value... There is more behind the scene's then you I or anyone else will ever know. People need to stop quoting every word a GM says because that becomes Diabolical lol. I do believe that if they got the right contract numbers for him,, they would have moved heaven and earth to do it... in short... you are both right and you are both wrong. Pay attention to the steak and not the peas ***This is where I separate the 2 of you and you go your own way"*** ha ha. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ @NewEra Keep up the good vibes bro peace Pow.. Bing. Bang. Boom. Now it is lol

So PFF is wrong that he is ranked a top 3 QB in this league? You think all this offensive line just has Dawkins and Brown as good? Implode like Allen? You are either completely clueless or your one of the biggest troll's on this board. The dude was picked to win the MVP early last year pre elbow injury for christ sakes.

yea, that is why I chose that team. Tried being realistic instead of feeding him to a dumpster fire team and that would be a bad example.

No, I do not think he is worth that, put him on a team lets say... The Chargers. A team that just maybe makes a top 10 team. (trying not to be bias) Gabe does NOT get close to these yards.. so no.. we should not resign him unless it is a team friendly deal. First big new contract.. he going to want the money

Monday night opener is not my first choice for sure but come on guys.. There is a lot more worthy things to complain about... Like.. Not getting D'Hop.. Sorry I had to and no... I do not want D'Hop now lol lighten up folks...

these numbers lol... that will be a hard contract to swallow.

again i ask, you said he was ranked 36th.. where did you see that?

Spotrac is not the end of all means. Spotrac has Davis at WR Rank: 29. That means he can be another teams #1 in the nfl. I am sorry but that ranking is way to high so I did some research on pff and top 100 WR's? Gabes off is not even on the top 50. 36th in targets, 52nd in receptions, 30th in yards (thanks JA) 12th in TDl. again (thanks JA) his last 5 games he averaged 60.56 yet Spotrac has him graded on the low end of the WR list at 29... makes ZERO sense. Spotrac has gabe at around 12 mil but lets play at your 10 mil 5 year deal at 50 mil? that would put him around 19th best paid WR in the league... Just stupid. I personally put Davis at around 8-9m a year. Especially if he repeats last year.

just let the boys get their rest the day before. we will be fine.

this whole thread is just nuts. shocked your even playing into it lol. the only thing that looks ridiculous is your thread.

59.3 was his actual coverage rating. ranked 68. the point was, and maybe I should have worded it better.. point being... Our rookies had a rough year having to START #2 out of the gate with a strong rotation, not allowing anyone to really get into the flow of the game.. They were rookies. They tried getting better then Levi for 2 straight seasons. Nothing panned out. depth guy sure. But if they stick him at #2 and hurt our playing time our rookies desperately needs then its an easy no.