-
Posts
5,705 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by PrimeTime101
-
-
2 minutes ago, simool said:
I do. Still a lazy statement. Thats like saying Allen is another Ryan Leaf. You never hear that crap uttered about white qb's.
I think you need to read up to op. Original Question is he another Tyrod/Vic or not? he said Vic. I think you need to skip the drama. he only answered my question and the question at hand was concerning ON field. Everyone knows he is not another Vic off the field. please skip the drama.
-
14 hours ago, gjv001 said:
Would prefer to see Bills take Jackson with one of their first round picks than White in the second.
In another thread I compare Taylor and Jackson...
eek
-
2 minutes ago, simool said:
This is such a lazy statement. No he is not another Vick. There was one Michael Vick. Damn good quarterback who let his personal life kill any chance of sustained NFL success. Well that and playing for/in Atlanta
By all accounts Jackson seems to have some character to him.
so you know we are talking about on the field not off right?
-
1 minute ago, ndirish1978 said:
I don't dislike Jackson, my view on him is the same as it is on Allen, Rudolph and to a lesser extent Darnold: there are a lot of things to like, but there are a bunch of issues that are directly related to how they play, be it inaccurate passing or a tendency to turn the ball over. IMO Rosen and Mayfield are a cut above the rest in terms of accuracy and have all the tools that translate to being a good QB in general. That said, Rosen's 2 concussions worry me and there's always the question of whether Mayfield's height will affect him at the next level. There's no surefire way to predict future success, the only thing you can do to maximize the chance you find a franchise QB is to pick someone with as little risk on the field as possible. For that reason and that reason only I think Rosen and Mayfield are the two best QBs in the draft. The other 4 could all be successful, but I would feel most comfortable with someone who I know can play the position at a high level and who I'm not depending on massive growth in order for them to be successful. I think those two have the highest floors.
Fair Observation
1 minute ago, #34fan said:Call it a hunch, but the more I think about Jackson, the more I feel like he'll be wearing aqua and orange come May...
Miami huh? lol
-
45 minutes ago, billspro said:
I think the bigger problem is the Bills don't draft enough QBs.
They picked a 1st round QB in the weakest overall draft class I have ever seen. EJ Manuel would probably be the 11th ranked QB in this class. They used a 5th round pick on Peterman who is more of a developmental backup. They reached on Cardale Jones in the 5th round who had huge accuracy issues. Then you probably have to go all the way back to Trent Edwards for the last QB drafted. All of the second round prospects have a chance to become franchise QBs, this is a great draft to need a QB. Rudolph, Jackson, and White would be first round QB prospects in a lot of drafts, it is just a really deep class this year.
So I would like to see your crystal ball as to how this draft class ends up? Your Assuming sir.
-
55 minutes ago, Teddy KGB said:
Another Vick. Might work, might not.
That's what I am wondering.
50 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said:Not a sure thing, but who is? I'd take a shot at him in the right spot. To me, that's outside of the top 20. I'm pretty sure he's a LOT better than Taylor ever was.
I agree its a crap shoot. What would be your "spot"
43 minutes ago, NewDayBills said:If we did draft Jackson, I'd want to take advantage of him as a runner, I think it'd be a mistake not to. Run option, spread offense and of course sprinkles of a pro style offense. I do think he'll be way better than Taylor, but I don't think he'll ever be a 4,000 yard passer, he may get you 4,000 yards rushing/passing combined, maybe he could grow as a passer as time goes on, but forcing him to be a pocket QB early in his career is a really bad idea.
You mean like taking advantage of Tyrods running abilities? how that working out?
24 minutes ago, jmc12290 said:TT threw less interceptions though!
Tyrod came out a bit more accurate yes.
7 minutes ago, jr1 said:I like this clip because it shows his escapability and arm strength
I can show you a few Tyrod whipped down field also. watch both.
-
1 hour ago, 26CornerBlitz said:
You might want to reconsider.
yep and?
-
So some are worried or scared that Lamar Jackson will turn out to be another Tyrod Taylor.. So i Thought I would post both stats and let you decide.Tyrod TaylorPASSING Stats
YEAR CMP ATT PCT YDS AVG TD LNG INT RAT 2007 72 134 53.7 927 6.9 5 59 3 119.7 2008 99 173 57.2 1036 6.0 2 40 7 103.2 2009 136 243 56.0 2311 9.5 13 81 5 149.4 2010 188 315 59.7 2743 8.7 24 69 5 154.8 RUSHING Stats YEAR ATT YDS AVG LNG TD 2007 102 420 4.1 52 6 2008 147 738 5.0 73 7 2009 106 370 3.5 46 5 2010 146 659 4.5 72 5
Lamar Jackson
PASSING Stats YEAR CMP ATT PCT YDS AVG TD LNG INT RAT 2017 254 430 59.1 3660 8.5 27 78 10 146.6 2016 230 409 56.2 3543 8.7 30 74 9 148.8 2015 135 247 54.7 1840 7.4 12 56 8 126.8 RUSHING Stats YEAR ATT YDS AVG LNG TD 2017 232 1601 6.9 75 18 2016 260 1571 6.0 72 21 2015 163 960 5.9 73 11
Notes
1. Jackson is coming out 1 year early but played as starting QB in college 1 year more so thus Jackson comes out more experienced.
2. Jackson best year Passing + Rushing yard total is 5,602 Yards total. Tyrods Total yards on his best year? 3,402 yards. Yes different conference different system but damn.
3. Taylor best year he threw the ball 315 times and 5 INT. Jackson best year threw the ball 430 times with 10 INT.
4. Taylor best year in TD's he had a total of 29 TD's. Jackson total TD's on his best year was 51.
5. Taylor was drafted in 6th round. Jackson is picked to be drafted in round 1 or 2.
So with this info in mind I ask you.. Is Lamar Jackson another Vic, Taylor? Or do you think he will be much better?
Thoughts
- 2
-
Yea this is fake. There is no way he knows Witch teams are talking with Kirk and who isn't. He cant possibly know.
-
Look... IF a GM trades up high to get us a QB I have no problem with it and I will tell you why...
#1 GM will not put his career on the line to go for a QB unless he is 100% sure that is our man.
#2 We just went 17 years without a franchise QB and now you want to wait another year? NO.
#3 Yep its a crap shoot.. but you cant win unless you don't play now and then right?
#4 Our draft capital is not huge but its enough to get us to top 10.
#5 People who love Buffalo football are tired of "game managers" and they have to sell seats.
Ideally I do not want to draft a QB.. I would rather shoot for the stars on Cousins or one of the guys in Minnesota. Then you have 5 picks in first 3 rounds to build around.
-
6 hours ago, Casmo said:
We have four picks in the first 56 picks - potentially all starters if we have the right scout personnel to guide Beane. QBs are at high price in this draft, since everybody is slobbering over them. Let's not draft a QB. Listen Tyrod can manage the game and has a winning record when a starter, so let's get some lineman and backers, possible receiver and get better.
Doug Whaley traded up and it hurt us for a few years. Lets not do that again unless it is a sure thing and a missing piece. We have several needs especially our O-line and D-lines. Matthews and Benjamin will be at full strength too.
Another QB Post? give it a rest.
-
37 minutes ago, The_Dude said:
Yeah? Well how the !@#$ has that been going for us the past 20 years?
OMG give it a rest drama boy.. Its in the past.. Believe the system. Different GM Coaching.. you cant compare apples and oranges.. you just cant. what was the last year we had this many draft picks in first 3 rounds? answer that Sherlock.
-
3 hours ago, The_Dude said:
My thought is a C, G, and WR are useless with Tyrod or whoever we can get at 21. I want/need a real QB.
I disagree.. Strongly.. You have to build past him. he is not the future of the team and you build around what ever QB you have good bad or indifferent.
-
7 hours ago, Seanbillsfan2206 said:
If there were ever a time in history that I would have said “I’m done with this team” it would have been when they let Bruce, Andre, and Thurman go all at the same time. They’ve made a ton of decisions that I haven’t agreed with over the years. At the end of the day this team is in my blood and I will never be able to just walk away.
yep and I came close....
-
21 hours ago, NewEra said:
Ugh. I’d rather have him than Tolbert but i don’t like him and would prefer someone else.
like who?
-
1 hour ago, nedboy7 said:
Cancer treatment in the us is dictated by the medical indaustial complex. Its all BS.
While some may agree or disagree to your quote.. Do you really think this is the place for this type of conversation?
I think not.
GL JIMBO! your Strong!
-
On 2/27/2018 at 2:02 PM, 26CornerBlitz said:
This is a terrible idea that I hope they vote down.
NFL Could Change Defensive PI to a 15-yard Penalty
The NFL is reportedly looking at implementing a number of rule changes, some expected (clarifying the catch rule) and some not so.
One of the surprising proposals offered by the NFL Competition Committee is to change the penalty for defensive pass interference from a spot foul to a 15-yard penalty at most, NFL Network's Judy Battista reported Tuesday. This is more in line with how the game is refereed on the collegiate level.
Changing the pass interference penalty is on its face a defense-first measure. Offenses would have far less to gain by "chucking it up" to try and draw a penalty from a grabby defensive back downfield.
I have no problem with this as long as the Interference isn't blatant. Blatant interference should be ball spot and I am sure they will talk about this.
Kind of like the Running into the kicker rule?
-
18 hours ago, The_Dude said:
That quote makes me so happy. We got in the playoffs last year (?) but we weren’t a playoff team. It’s good to hear McDermott acknowledge that the cupboard isn’t full. I just feel like he gets the situation. But I’ll never understand what he was thinking last year when he passed on Mahomes. Bad decision imo.
You know what's better? we have 5 draft picks in the first 3 rounds to address our needs. Even if we cant get one of the big FA QB's, think of the holes we cover.
C, G, DT, WR, Best QB available at 22. (unless top 4 are all gone in witch I doubt) and deal with the rest in FA
4th round pick up a RB if its not addressed in FA
I think the key word left out so far is yet. If they hit the grand slam bases loaded in round 1 and 2.. then I think we will be better then last year..
Thoughts?
-
He said that she said that my best friends girlfriends cousin said this?
REALLY?
lol..
But to be honest.. threads like this with no sources should be locked down and closed.
-
http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/7510/zach-brown
the 28 year old wants top price
********************************************************************************************************
ESPN's Josina Anderson reports impending free agent ILB Zach Brown wants "top-three inside linebacker" money.Luke Kuechly ($12.36 million), Bobby Wagner ($10.75 million), and Alec Ogletree ($10.5 million) are currently the league's three highest-paid inside linebackers. 28-year-old Brown has strung together back-to-back strong seasons with the Bills and Redskins and wants to cash in after settling for a one-year, $2.3 million deal last March. We doubt he gets the $10 million-plus annually he's seeking. Feb 28 - 11:34 AMSource**************************************************************************************************************************************************************
He denied 7mil.
I say.. uh.. no he is not worth more then 7-8 mil and if he thinks he is worth the same as the likes of Luke Kuechly or Bobby Wagner then he has another thing coming..
but someone will say no.
-
On 1/18/2018 at 2:03 PM, Mrbojanglezs said:
Kirk Cousins is my first choice.
Bridgewater is my second choice.
Exactly then spend 5 picks on offensive and defensive lines and a true ILB. Address WR #2 in FA
-
13 hours ago, Alphadawg7 said:
Another worthless and utterly lazy comment that has nothing to do with the thread where it deals directly the REALITY of what our OPTIONS truly are as a BRIDGE. And the thread literally says TRADING TT would be ideal.
But thanks for trying...well not really. And sorry, but to call my post a look at me thread is stupid. I could care less...but I wanted to discuss the real realities of what our REAL choices for bridges are where we focused on the real variables of what will make one possible over the other.
Just wondering how many Tyrod Taylor threads you plan on making? Its a legit response.. Enough is enough.
- 1
-
6 hours ago, YoloinOhio said:
I’m pretty sure everyone had RG3 over Cousins.
Did you really find what he’s saying to be that outlandish to believe he’s an idiot for saying it? It wouldnt be too hard for me to find 4 players in the draft who are better prospects at their position than the best QB. And given what Carson Wentz is, I don’t see any of them being that exact QB either from what we know today. They each possess some very good skills/qualities though.
I agree, just that I don't listen to his theories anymore cause 50% of the time they are wrong. His statement wasn't exactly bold yet his word doesn't sit on much either.
-
3 hours ago, YoloinOhio said:
Mike Mayock?
The same idiot that thought Gabbert would be better then Cam Newton?
The same idiot that said liked Weeden over Cousins?
The same idiot that picked RG3 over Cousins?
The same idiot that LOVED Josh Freeman?
Come on guys lets not care for one second what this guy has to say.. Please
Difference between Jackson and Taylor
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
Stop being a drama boy please. I have no time for it.