PrimeTime101

its the threat.. its about 20-40 more yards of offense coming from the RB position... I dont want us to be TEN.

Howard is a prove it contract.. I can see Howard wanting to stay if he does well and we at least make it to the big game this year. Crowder is a different story.

its not about more weapons though.. its different TYPE of weapons. We got Howard cause that gives us weapons in a 2 TE set. We got Crowder out of need. A weapon at RB would bring this offense to where KC was when they had Hall. 1000% a... disagree lol... Though I get your point I think that is about even.... lets face facts... drafting is a flip of the coin or sometimes worse depending on the position BUT if i had to put money on one? yea RB lol

I agree... Thats why if you have to reach for RB or CB in the first round... you reach for RB and get your CB Round 2. Last season the top 10 CB's, 5 came from the 2015 draft (3 of them outside round 1) and we are looking at a CB draft this year almost as deep in my opinion.... let that sink in..

did you watch that game? this might be the worst take I have read so far this year... there was 65 seconds left at the end of the game... Josh HAD to get a TD.. and he did it in 52 seconds... Where was there time to burn the clock that drive? have you lost your mind? You know when we could of burned the time? you know who burned clock that game? KC... They had 9 more minutes on the clock in time of possession and though Mahomes was the better rusher their #2 rusher ran for 60 yards. You know what our #1 rusher was? Josh Allen 68 yards... You know how many yards our RB's did combined? 41 yards... HORRIBLE!

Your either reaching for CB in round 1 or reaching for RB in round 1. CB seems to be the highest position needed but a top tier HB makes your team a whole lot dynamic on offense. You go 2 deep against Hall or Spiller... your going to wish you didnt... You bring a any safety forward... they going to wish they didnt. It seems this year it is about creating mismatches based on the team you are playing against. Being diverse against teams Like KC last year... and I am going to give you another example of how to beat KC? Baltimore beat KC cause they can run the ball. Chargers scored points fast passing but their running game stopped KC from having so many drives and thats how Chargers beat KC... KC lost to TEN cause of the running game. Lost the the Bengals Twice cause they can pass and run. Diversity is key.. and its not about your RB having to run 150 yard a game... its about the THREAT... We do not have a THREAT... Big Difference folks... Good teams that have great rosters sometimes have to reach. This is the worst take I have read this week... You know what great teams do in the draft that have 1 or 2 holes? They do all they can to move up or back to get their player and if they cant then they fill the hole anyhow cause great teams don't have many holes to fill...

the worst they can do is take away draft picks and fine the team

"in news today, NFL launches and independent investigation that will cost the league thousands of dollars and lead to absolutely nothing". The Stadium Wall launches its own impendent investigation as to why the NFL would even bother with something that happened 5 years ago that will lead to 0 punishments.

Common WR/CB Injuries... ACL/Hammies This is great for strength and conditioning for these areas.

"You Can't Teach Accuracy"

Mel gets paid to get it wrong.

If you have to ask us that question, then your either clueless or trolling...

John... I have been trying to turn a new leaf on these forums.. You can troll a troll or you can give a person the benefit of the doubt... I could act like an idiot... I could shadow mod I wont... for now on im just giving the benefit of the doubt and if it continues... troll. Threads like this just need to be locked faster... just my opinion... I need to stop wasting time on this i guess

just stop man... your digging your hole deeper. Knox was ranked 6th best TE in the LEAGUE.... https://www.fantasypros.com/nfl/stats/te.php How much more dominate do you want? Now i am starting to wonder...

More like "the invisible man"

You know what i get out of this post from the Athletic? The Police drive up to a bunch a gangsters and they scream to the cops.. "nothing to see here... Carry on!"

YOU would pay for the whole stadium? Would you please?

yea your still off on so much...

Instead of being a troll like 1/8th of the people on this board... instead of putting a thumbs down or a puke and not explain it.. Im going to take the time to tear this post up and put it back together again as to why your wrong at some positions. Center: In my opinion Center is a concern but not this year.. It is something we have to watch for Next year for the future. this is not a NOW issue. This team is being built to win NOW and with Josh, our future is bright.. so I get your point.. your a year to early. TE: So yea.. TE was a concern.. we wanted Gronk... but then we got Howard. Getting a TE goes 2 fold. A. As a 2 TE threat... another way to score.. B. To have a Vet TE on the team and try and get Knox to the next level of greatness. Gronk would be a one year deal.. Howard is a one year deal. only one team has the best TE in the business.. thats KC.. That being said, I could see a late round pick at TE and hope we hit gold... and likely hit fools gold. Guard: This is where I am with you.. I have no problems getting a mid round Guard. 0 Runningback: We don't suck but we are average. A great RB would make this team so diverse. I also am one of the few that would love a second round HB. SPEED.... Defensive End: The dudes name is Miller... Von Miller.. (you know Bond... James Bond) its covered... your wrong here.. Cornerback: Captain obvious we need a CB Offensive Tackle: You cant be top end madden in every position. we are slightly better then average here and I am ok with it. Linebacker: not a immediate need. Edmunds is not top caliber and I think most will agree we can get better here... but we can also got LOTS worse... WR: yep.. SPEED! ***YOUR FATAL FLAW*** You named every position accept QB on offense... Really? even though I know your not trolling or trying to put a stupid post up.. it screams Troll and or screams WHAT THE HECK IS THIS! Thus your going to get a horrible reaction. DID you watch the KC game? Our OL was not the issue.. it was what we were doing on defense or the lack there of... This League wont see a team for a long time now that had one of the Best QB in the game.. Best TE in the game and Best WR in the game... wont happen again for a long time... Mahomes/Hill/Kelce made each other look CRAZY good... A MOD here told me one time... making Quality posts in these forums is more important than Quantity. You just basically said we need upgrade at every position on the offense accept QB. In general.. your right... we could use an upgrade at many of these positions.. I just don't think this thread is practical and does not serve the purpose you were hoping for... And you made some errors in here...

To the bolded... that is a HIGHLY opinionated statement.

I keep seeing slightly above average QB's getting overpaid and lovin' Josh's contract better n better

Thank You... its just so tiring having to explain this year after year... IF this year at pick 25 or any pick the BPA lets say round 2 is a TE, QB... do these guys really think we go TE or QB in round 2? come on guys... SPOT ON explained it better then I did... BPA round 2 happens to be a QB.. we picking a QB? NO... BPA need with the positional value each team gives.. and its very different from team to team how they value the players based on need as well.

you really think i am going to give away who I am online? just stop... No NFL team does pure BPA no matter the position...

sorry i dont give out personal info