
warrior9
Community Member-
Posts
1,206 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by warrior9
-
WR trade candidates, who do you want?
warrior9 replied to Einstein's Dog's topic in The Stadium Wall
Ok, Coleman will be better than Gabe and Shakir was better than Diggs down the stretch, which is undeniable. if the topic is WR, why are you worried so much? chiefs won with their TE being their top choice 3 times in 5 - 6 years… we’ll be fine. We won without Gabe and Diggs down the stretch…? Not to mention: EVEN IF we had a better WR room last year (which we didn't), we can get away with it being worse this year because of the emergence of Cook and Kincaid, unsure how you don't see this? again, if you don’t understand the value of getting younger with better talent, I have nothing to say. -
WR trade candidates, who do you want?
warrior9 replied to Einstein's Dog's topic in The Stadium Wall
We did not have better WR's .... Gabe and Diggs were non-existent last year down the stretch. Our three best receivers (cook is one) down that stretch are back, are rookies to 3 years in the NFL.. you don't see the value in that? Do you seriously not understand the value of a 22 y/o, young TE that is budding, and a receiving threat that is 23/24? If not, I can't help you.. -
WR trade candidates, who do you want?
warrior9 replied to Einstein's Dog's topic in The Stadium Wall
If any trade were going to happen, this would be it. This board is obsessed with trading for a WR and it's just not going to happen. Beane said in his post draft interview that this was an infusion of youth off season. I think they believe we are more than set at WR and I agree. If I had to guess, they see Kincaid forming into a #1 option while Coleman develops this year. They see Samuel being a defacto #1 WR while Shakir plays the slot. We are more than fine at WR since #17 is our QB. We don't have big names because we got rid of our only "big name" so people panic. We will have a new "big name"(or #1) by the end of the season whether it's any of the mentioned above is to be determined. -
This. Elam WILL play this year. Burks can't stay on the field. This year is going to be huge for Elam, I just hope McDermott doesn't keep him in the dog house for a reason that makes no sense. He needs to play to get better. When he played in the playoffs last year, there were SO many flashes but the rust was palpable. After watching that game (I believe wild card game), I came away thinking, "He got so much better as the game went on, maybe he just needs to play to learn and grow." Some people just don't get enough / learn by mere practice. Because Bills fans NEED a name for some reason. It was Higgins, then Aiyuk, then Deebo, now it's Burks... it won't stop. Once people realize that the Chiefs won a SB with MVS as their #1 WR, they will relax but Bills fans are soooo set on other names. Burks has been absolutely ABYSMAL in Tennessee lol
-
Calling it now: You're all about to witness the arrival of Shakir
warrior9 replied to Alphadawg7's topic in The Stadium Wall
I think you're last "calling it now" was Bills make AFCCG. Do you just pick things and say that so you can say "I told you so!" if it happens? He was literally our best WR down the stretch. We now have Samuel, Hamler, and Coleman on the outside. We have Kincaid at Flex/ TE... is this some.... insane take that only you have or something? I believe most of us think this.... -
Probably some of that and probably some of it wanting to get younger with more knowledge of today's game. It's probably all encompassing. Recognizable faces too. Those that are 18-25 don't know who Phil, Boomer, Terry, etc are (and if they do, they can't relate to them).
-
Not the Falcons...... LOL.. My assessment is this: We didn't have a lot of holes per se, we needed to get younger and add depth at certain positions, which we did. We replaced guys we lost with younger prospects. Out of this class if we get 3 starters, we're in REALLY good shape. If either of our DE's are more than serviceable in 2 years..... we will be in great position. The Chiefs traded Hill and won the Superbowl.
-
His name is in the video you posted....... in the title......
-
What's the point of this team's philosophy?
warrior9 replied to Pine Barrens Mafia's topic in The Stadium Wall
Because this isn't fking Madden. Bills fans are insufferable man. -
No man, he's slow... can't separate. We needed a 6'1 170 pound receiver that is so good that our GM traded out of the spot instead of taking him.
-
Was this enough in the pre-season last year? -Rashee Rice -MVS -Skyy Moore -Kadarius Toney -Justyn Ross -Justin Watson -Montrell Washington People need to relax. We have Josh Allen. We lost a guy in our room that did nothing the last 6 weeks of the year. We lost a blocking WR. We still have Josh Allen. This year is going to hinge heavily on Joe Brady, IMO.
-
This ... Jacksonville's room is hilarious. We at least have upside even without our pick thats about to come in. Baltimore's isn't good. The Jets have Conklin and a dude that is more injured than anyone in the league. The problem with Buffalo sports fans is ... if it's not a big name, they're not good(to most people). People want Higgins and he has been SOOO average. It's weird. We have Josh Allen. The Chiefs won a SB with MVS and Rashee Rice who wasn't anything special. Samuel is an exceptional football player that has never had a QB and has injury history. Shakir is literally the same size as Diggs and runs faster (just has shorter arms and he was a 5th round pick in his second year of development).... we'll be fine.
-
This is my list too.
-
Why the Bills don't "need" a traditional X receiver
warrior9 replied to Mikey152's topic in The Stadium Wall
Right but if you can't beat man, you can't beat the Chiefs. The Bills play 98% zone (just ball parking because it's a lot) and we can't beat a starting QB in the playoffs. We have not beaten a team above the 5 seed. You need to effectively play man in some capacity to win. -
Why the Bills don't "need" a traditional X receiver
warrior9 replied to Mikey152's topic in The Stadium Wall
Just gotta scroll man.. it has all their routes vs man and vs zone. Diggs ran 168 routes vs man and had 26 catches.... just control F 26 -
Why the Bills don't "need" a traditional X receiver
warrior9 replied to Mikey152's topic in The Stadium Wall
Right right, sorry. Played* Wish that was the case 3 years ago lol -
Why the Bills don't "need" a traditional X receiver
warrior9 replied to Mikey152's topic in The Stadium Wall
YES! This is all I'm saying about small guys and Worthy (especially in the first round).. DUDE give me Coleman over Worthy ALLL fkin day. Id rather have him than the Chiefs have him. Puka was a late pick, ran slow for 40 but was fastest in the drill where you run in a straight line, turn your head, catch passes(think they call it the gauntlet). Coleman was fastest through that at combine this year. Plays a lot faster than his straight line speed. He can make contest catches, he's a tough SOB. Unfortunately for the Bills, Snead plays for KC or we'd have 1 or 2 championships. Snead just abuuuuused Diggs man. It was very hard to watch. -
Why the Bills don't "need" a traditional X receiver
warrior9 replied to Mikey152's topic in The Stadium Wall
I shared a link that has his routes ran and catches against man... actually, the whole NFL. -
Why the Bills don't "need" a traditional X receiver
warrior9 replied to Mikey152's topic in The Stadium Wall
Italicized: I am not disputing that. He was great. Until he played the Chiefs, Sneed just OWNED him man... unfortunately. And I agree. However, we need a bigger body IMO (which is why im SO against Worthy for this team..i don't dislike worthy, i dislike him for this team in it's current state) to win off the line and make contested catches. It's been a lot time since we've had a WR make contested catches regularly (outside of Diggs 2 years ago). -
Why the Bills don't "need" a traditional X receiver
warrior9 replied to Mikey152's topic in The Stadium Wall
https://www.pff.com/news/fantasy-football-wr-report-man-zone-coverage-performance-nfl-week-17-2023#BUF This is going in to Week 17 of last year... obv it's for fantasy stuff but they have his routes and catches last year... Please share your link. Here's more to rebut your claim. -
Why the Bills don't "need" a traditional X receiver
warrior9 replied to Mikey152's topic in The Stadium Wall
168 routes and 26 catches does not seem the best to me.......... -
Why the Bills don't "need" a traditional X receiver
warrior9 replied to Mikey152's topic in The Stadium Wall
Where did you see the bolded? We are agreeing on the italicized.. It is not about size. You have to move in a phone booth Diggs ran 168 routes against Man last year and had 26 catches... thats top 7 in the NFL? -
Why the Bills don't "need" a traditional X receiver
warrior9 replied to Mikey152's topic in The Stadium Wall
Did.... you uhh.. did you watch the Chiefs game? And Z WR's are not just outside "off the ball"........................? YIKES -
Why the Bills don't "need" a traditional X receiver
warrior9 replied to Mikey152's topic in The Stadium Wall
I keep saying Diggs couldn't get off the line to the other poster who used Diggs as an example of a WR good against man... and he simply wasn't last few years. I never said that i'm against drafting the next Diggs... at all? Diggs is 6'1 200 something pounds. I'm talking purely football on the field. Small WR's do not have an advantage at getting off the line as this guy suggested. There is literally a position for small receivers to move freely and be off the ball.... for a reason. There is a reason Kupp and Edelmen, and all of the small quick guys play in the slot...... it's because they can't get off the ball.