warrior9

Ummmmm.... Kamara is 41, Humphrey is 44, the list goes on. Might be the dumbest comment I ever did see.

I really hope we don't cut D. Johnson. Love what he does on special teams and he is actually a pretty solid player. He played at a small school and has still been learning the NFL game/speed. He plays with a high motor and it seems like this staff likes him a lot. My hope is that: One, both, or all three (the rookies and D Johnson) outperform Addison in camp. D Johnson can be on this roster for a while longer while Addison has 1 year left.

So, Clyde Edwards- Helaire? Pretty much the same size and Patterson is a little faster than him. If you can play you can play. In any case, I don't think he was drafted because he played in the MAC and had a dominant offensive line. The other RB had numbers that were just as good

Shows what they think of Love. If you truly believe he is the heir apparent and QB of the future. You take the 3rd overall pick, keep your other 1st round pick, and begin to build around him. Take Kyle Pitts at 3, now you have Adams and Pitts. I think them turning this trade down shows they don't think Love is ready. To be absolutely fair, I think Rodgers is the best QB to ever grace a football field and he's still currently the best playing. However, if you truly believe Love is your guy, this could set you up for 10 years and not have to deal with Rodgers contract yearly for the next 4-6.

Ew

After watching that video, I came away with thinking "Damn, Beasley is REALLLLLY good at finding space." He's just such a great zone beater. When you go back and watch it really shows how valuable he is.

Well it technically would be a 6year deal. He has this year, his 5th year option, THEN the new money deal.

I looked around for a thread on this. Didn't see one on the article, just prediction threads. 4 years, 168 Mill. 78 guaranteed. Sounds about right. This puts him ahead of Watson and behind Mahomes. Below is the article. https://www.spotrac.com/research/nfl/projecting-josh-allens-contract-extension-1198/

I agree with this. He didn't take a "step back" he was asked to "do more" He didn't show up as much on the stat sheet but I thought he played pretty well.

Aaron Schobel I don't know why, I always thought he was overrated because he was a decent player on a bad team. Just as a player, unsure about as a human.

Me either, man. I hate it to be honest.

Sorry, it was their combined time in NY in those 2 years. Darnold didn't start all games Anderson caught passes for.

Right, but this isn't college. I think this just makes the NFL look elementary. That's just my opinion, though. I'm sure people don't mind it.

Basically, they want more players to be able to wear single digits and teens, (CBs, TEs, WR, DB, RB, etc)

Yeah. It's not necessarily about the numbers per se but the integrity of the "professional" side of football. It's helped to identify personnel. Even in pre-season when I saw this, I thought it looked so elementary and so un- uniformed (if that's a word).

I mean, their weapons are veryyy solid. They do need a TE and to sure up their OL. When Darnold threw to Anderson his last year in NY, he had 88 completions, 88.5 completion%, 1,341 yards, 11 TDs, and 21 completions over 20+ yards. DJ Moore is a very talented receiver as well and obviously they have CMC. I don't think it's about them believing they're a QB away, I believe it's about them building for the long term. It's hard to be passionate about football playing for Gase. I wouldn't be surprised to see a Tannehil type turn around in some capacity. Maybe not that extent but I wouldn't be surprised. If they go get Jamar Chase at 8, suddenly they have Joe Brady, Darnold, 4 weapons, and one of whom was one of the best receivers in college playing for Brady.

I haaaate this rule.

Good for Darnold. Very talented I think he'll be good in Carolina.

ETN and Rousseau (sp?). Other than that. I mean, our starters are pretty set. We're really adding depth here at this point and I trust they'll get who they deem best fit for our team. I think we need most help at OG and DE(since our two starters are older).

I mean, grey have been our default facemasks for 3 or so years now .

Thanks champ.

It's an April Fools joke, i'd assume. McKenzie is not putting that sort of thing in a contract.

If they trade that pick for Watson, It'll be trading essentially nothing for him since its the Texans original pick...... What a friggin win for Miami.

I read an article a few years back after his first season prior to his first post season announcing. It said something along the lines of: The reason he's so good right now is because he played with a lot of these QB's and knows their checks and where they go. As times goes on, he wont be able to predict plays anymore because the way of audibling from these QB's will be changed and/or gone. Now I like Romo and I think he's an entertaining listen and he clearly knows the game very well. But I kind of agree with the above sentiment.

You brought up the career games, YPG, catches, but didn't bring up how many years it was over, just game numbers. If you put them together, those numbers are VERY solid. If you want to expand it over 2 years, fine(which you didn't do in your first response to me). That doesn't take away from his talent. Again, go watch his tape and look at the talent. One more time, its VERY apparent. No being undrafted doesn't make his talent better, it was just an additional comment.