Sweats

That's a huge NO. He single handedly set Denver back about 8-10 years with his piss poor drafting and overall bad decisions with that franchise.........and then couldn't understand why he got fired. ..............he then rushed back to his ole daddy Belichick's teet Disgusting

I don't know if you guys knew this or not, but he's not very good.

Understood, however, in the 3rd quarter Henry and Hill "went off" and started gaining traction and earning their yards and at that point there was still plenty of time on the clock to keep running the ball. We had no answer for the running game in the 2nd half. I think Harbough f'd up with his game plan by not continuing to run the ball in the 2nd half, but as others have suggested, maybe he was thinking that because we were so conservative with JA, that the Ravens were looking to keep throwing points on the board as often as they could in case we unleashed JA which may or may have not become a shootout........Harbough would never want that. Maybe our gameplan and McD got into Harbough's head and made him rethink his strategy.

What i'm seeing this year from the Bills is that they are forcing teams to play their best game against us to win.......KC has looked absolutely lackluster all season and i'm hoping this Sunday is not the day for this KC team to "go off". If we can mentally beat them into submission early and often, we are walking away with the win.........bank on it.

Now that you bring it all together in one statement..........i have no words, except that every team's legacy is remembered for something.

.............oh, i've always been pretty much a failure. I sleep good at night. I have problems.

I'm not trying to make light of this, but does this mean the dead guy couldn't watch? I'm not sure if i'm reading this correctly.

If that happened, i would stop watching football altogether.........i'm almost there now, by the way.

.......that's a real shame.

Watch the KC film, who's the O lineman that always plays about 5' off the LOS?........he never gets called on it and it's a HUGE advantage. The announcers last weekend were mentioning it during the KC/Texans game that it was a "for sure" penalty and the guy never got called out on it.........and then i couldn't "unsee" it all game long.

I don't know, man.......it's -35 over where i live and that's impacting me even going outside today.

Ball placement was a little off and LJ was a half second too late in throwing it.

Just like Mahomes on the weekend, the ref didn't actually see him get hit, just saw Mahomes head snap back and assumed that it was a hit to the head.......replay showed he was hit in the chest (a perfectly legal hit) but because the ref saw the reaction and not the actual hit, assumed it was roughing the passer. ............disgusting.

All, good points. I'm not sure if Brady knows how to fully utilize TE's in his schemes. As i recall with his time at LSU, they typically focused on the WR's and RB's and looked at TE's as an afterthought, which is why i am kind of leaning in that direction for the limited TE production in the Bills O (just a theory). I watched Kincaid play in college and was ecstatic that we drafted him, however, his NFL production has been dismal, sporadic and non-existent and i have no other words other than not being schemed properly, same goes for Knox. I think if we could get both these guys going, we could arguably have the best one-two TE punch in the league, but as it sits now, it's almost like we're going to keep going with what has brought us to the dance and so far, it hasn't been the TE's.

What?!?........what the hell is wrong with you? This is classic stuff, man.

Dilly Dilly

Logic, my man.......for the most part i would agree with this, however, how are we in the AFC divisional round if teams have figured us out by taking away the middle of the field and limiting Shakir and our TE's? Wouldn't teams have figured it out the past 12 games and actually created the blueprint on how to beat us, especially down the stretch? Obviously, we're doing something right cause we're still winning games, most by 20-30 points, i might add and teams aren't even slowing us down. Every player is getting the ball and everyone is producing. You would think that if teams have taken away the middle and by forcing us to throw to the outside (which we have no real threat) that we would have limited scoring and/or limited points reflected on the scoreboard. I think this is exactly the O that Brady and McD want.........take away our TE's, we'll find someone else.......take away Shakir, we'll throw it to Hollins........take away Hollins, well, how about Samuel.........no Samuel, we'll dump it to Cook or how about Davis or Ty? I don't think taking away the middle is an issue for this team as long as they compensate with scheme. .......my opinion.

..........self-doubt and loss of confidence

Basically, i had an older computer that i was getting rid of anyways, so all my brother-in-law did was bypass the Windows anti-virus protection and just install other anti-virus programs to see what would happen...... * Macfee allowed "trojan horses, worms and logic bombs" to get onto the computer. * Norton allowed "trojans horses, spyware and boot sector viruses" * Malwarebytes allowed "trojan horses and spyware" It's like as soon as he set up an anti-virus program, seriously within about 5 minutes of being online, the computer was getting notification after notification that the computer was getting bombarded with viruses........almost like it was just one big homing beacon, inviting everything in and then saying it could only delete about 90% of them, but the remaining 10% were "back dooring" everything (the trojan horses and spyware were the worst culprits) And i kid you not, within a day, we couldn't access files anymore, files were corrupted, the memory diminished, etc........wild stuff, man. I've had a lot of computers since then and have not put one anti-virus software on any of them and have never had one single issue. As i said before, if my brother-in-law doesn't do it or says not to do it, i don't do it........he knows what he's talking about and he's a lot smarter than me and he deals with this stuff every day. It's up to you though........don't let me sway anyone's decision.

..........are you secretly referring to my mattress? I see where you're going with this.

Here's my way of thinking...... I can honestly live with a loss against KC next week if the team gives everything they have and leaves it all on the table......i can live with that, there's no shame in defeat at that point to know that the team gave everything they had and fell short, however, i will be severely disgusted if the team is not prepared, comes out flat, doesn't know assignments, etc.......and that is something i can't live with. I never fault anyone for giving everything they have and coming up short, it happens and the better team won that day.

Honest answer is that this should be the year and whether it works out like that, i don't know.

I've never tried this one as a pickup line at the bar. Interesting........interesting indeed.

I've witnessed a slew of "Billsy" seasons, grief and heartache and i have zero sympathy for Andrews. If that makes me an ***hole, then have at it.

I honestly can't say the season is a success until we beat KC in the post season. How do we show the rest of the league how far we've come, but still not being able to beat the best?.........and like it or not, KC is still the best until we dethrone them. This KC team is the most beatable they've ever been and who we've faced in the past 5 or so years and if we can't beat them, then we are just another franchise that tried and failed to make a bid for the crown. Sorry, not sorry.