Sweats

All these talking heads with their "great knowledge" of the game.........bwahahahahahahaha. They all said....... Jets are going to show the Bills how it's done.............Bills won Fins are going to give us a beatdown............Bills won KC in the regular season will show the rest of the league how it's done...........Bills won SF is going to whip the Bills into submission...........Bills won The Lions are going to cake walk us............Bills won Ravens in the post season are going to steam roll us................Bills won Do you see the theme here?

.............and maybe introduce Taylor Swift to the Tush Plow?!?

Turnovers aren't probably going to mean much against KC cause they rarely ever turn the ball over, however, we need to keep playing gritty and go toe to toe with them for a full 60 minutes.

Well, we've got a couple of different things to focus on here.......... * Cover Kelce * Sut down the run game * Spy Mahomes I didn't include Worthy cause he's a rookie and usually gets in his own way, so he's not much of a threat to us. History has shown when Reid tries to showcase him that if you shut him down early and often, KC tends to go away from him. Also, the dude is the size of a twig.......hit him a few times and make him cry. Teams have shown that if you can pressure Mahomes, he makes bad decisions, and we don't necessarily need to sack him, just force pressure around him and create chaos in his pocket, which forces him to dance around, but if we've got a legitimate spy on him, he'll fold. Let him know that's it's going to be a longggggggggg day for him if he tries his bull**** with us. Kelsey is not who he once was. He is still a threat and is still Mahomes number one guy to throw to in a pinch, but if we jam him at the line and disrupt his routes and rhythm, we can slow him down and get him out of the plays. Absolutely stopping their run game should definitely be high on our list. Like, i'm talking stopping it cold and stopping it before it can even get going.

Stephen A also said the Bills had zero chance against the Ravens and would get steam-rolled, so............

I don't think Belichick's teet has any moles..........

You don't think the Bills vs. NE (the perfect game) a few years back was the best coached?..........i mean, i can't think of a better game plan than the one i saw from the team that night, i can tell you. NE had all but given up by the 2nd quarter........threw in the towel, waving the white flag sort of giving up.

That's a huge NO. He single handedly set Denver back about 8-10 years with his piss poor drafting and overall bad decisions with that franchise.........and then couldn't understand why he got fired. ..............he then rushed back to his ole daddy Belichick's teet Disgusting

I don't know if you guys knew this or not, but he's not very good.

Understood, however, in the 3rd quarter Henry and Hill "went off" and started gaining traction and earning their yards and at that point there was still plenty of time on the clock to keep running the ball. We had no answer for the running game in the 2nd half. I think Harbough f'd up with his game plan by not continuing to run the ball in the 2nd half, but as others have suggested, maybe he was thinking that because we were so conservative with JA, that the Ravens were looking to keep throwing points on the board as often as they could in case we unleashed JA which may or may have not become a shootout........Harbough would never want that. Maybe our gameplan and McD got into Harbough's head and made him rethink his strategy.

What i'm seeing this year from the Bills is that they are forcing teams to play their best game against us to win.......KC has looked absolutely lackluster all season and i'm hoping this Sunday is not the day for this KC team to "go off". If we can mentally beat them into submission early and often, we are walking away with the win.........bank on it.

Now that you bring it all together in one statement..........i have no words, except that every team's legacy is remembered for something.

.............oh, i've always been pretty much a failure. I sleep good at night. I have problems.

I'm not trying to make light of this, but does this mean the dead guy couldn't watch? I'm not sure if i'm reading this correctly.

If that happened, i would stop watching football altogether.........i'm almost there now, by the way.

.......that's a real shame.

Watch the KC film, who's the O lineman that always plays about 5' off the LOS?........he never gets called on it and it's a HUGE advantage. The announcers last weekend were mentioning it during the KC/Texans game that it was a "for sure" penalty and the guy never got called out on it.........and then i couldn't "unsee" it all game long.

I don't know, man.......it's -35 over where i live and that's impacting me even going outside today.

Ball placement was a little off and LJ was a half second too late in throwing it.

Just like Mahomes on the weekend, the ref didn't actually see him get hit, just saw Mahomes head snap back and assumed that it was a hit to the head.......replay showed he was hit in the chest (a perfectly legal hit) but because the ref saw the reaction and not the actual hit, assumed it was roughing the passer. ............disgusting.

All, good points. I'm not sure if Brady knows how to fully utilize TE's in his schemes. As i recall with his time at LSU, they typically focused on the WR's and RB's and looked at TE's as an afterthought, which is why i am kind of leaning in that direction for the limited TE production in the Bills O (just a theory). I watched Kincaid play in college and was ecstatic that we drafted him, however, his NFL production has been dismal, sporadic and non-existent and i have no other words other than not being schemed properly, same goes for Knox. I think if we could get both these guys going, we could arguably have the best one-two TE punch in the league, but as it sits now, it's almost like we're going to keep going with what has brought us to the dance and so far, it hasn't been the TE's.

What?!?........what the hell is wrong with you? This is classic stuff, man.

Dilly Dilly

Logic, my man.......for the most part i would agree with this, however, how are we in the AFC divisional round if teams have figured us out by taking away the middle of the field and limiting Shakir and our TE's? Wouldn't teams have figured it out the past 12 games and actually created the blueprint on how to beat us, especially down the stretch? Obviously, we're doing something right cause we're still winning games, most by 20-30 points, i might add and teams aren't even slowing us down. Every player is getting the ball and everyone is producing. You would think that if teams have taken away the middle and by forcing us to throw to the outside (which we have no real threat) that we would have limited scoring and/or limited points reflected on the scoreboard. I think this is exactly the O that Brady and McD want.........take away our TE's, we'll find someone else.......take away Shakir, we'll throw it to Hollins........take away Hollins, well, how about Samuel.........no Samuel, we'll dump it to Cook or how about Davis or Ty? I don't think taking away the middle is an issue for this team as long as they compensate with scheme. .......my opinion.

..........self-doubt and loss of confidence