leonbus23

http://profootballspot.com/are-these-the-same-old-buffalo-bills/ Good read. Especially the optimistic second half. There is hope.

Brady can eat a 5 course dinner with our pass rush.

I like your optimism!

Thank you. Bills. 7-9.

In the hunt.

Same old Bills

Okay. Bills officially suck.

Tolbert TD

Tyrod stats!!

Awful. Awful. Terrible. Bills.

More Tolbert!

Shut the game down.

Tolbert fever. Got it!

Patriots. Again.

This did not go as planned. But it does fit the Bills. Reality. Welcome back!

31-7. Jets. Holy ****

In the hunt. Late nov.

In the hunt.

Wow. Well. Fun while lasted. Thanks Bills!

True. Take it out. Go Bills!

Thought this was a Franz Fanon post.

Diego? Agreed!

Yes. This year's game.

I looked at the penalty data from 2016 and 2017. It is hard to make any strong claim or thesis about the penalties. I developed a reasonable methodology to analyze the data. It involves what I call "subjective calls" versus "non-subjective calls." In short, a subjective call is one that a ref makes based completely on his own empirical judgement (holds, interference, etc.). Non-subjective calls are things like offsides, delay of game and so forth. Generally, the Pats* are beneficiaries of one or two extra subjective calls a game. One game that stands out from the rest is the Chiefs game. The data is below: Week 1: Subjective calls against the Patriots- 3 Defensive Pass Interference Unnecessary Roughness Offensive Holding (Offsetting) Subjective Calls Against the Opponent- 13 Defensive Pass Interference Defensive Holding (Offsetting) Defensive Holding Offensive Holding Offensive Holding Offensive Holding Unnecessary Roughness Defensive Holding Defensive Pass Interference Taunting Offensive Holding Defensive Holding Illegal Block Above the Waist I am not sure how to make any strong claims based on this one game.

59. He shoved anderson out of bounds about 5 min ago. Haven't seen him otherwise.