BananaB

Spoke too soon

Barkley looks good

The oline is so ***** bad

Brown and Jackson are two guys Beane said we’re gonna be stars a few years ago, he’s still crossing his fingers.

Oline looks almost as good as last year. 😂

Seems we are linked to everyone that isn’t a QB

I have trouble seeing him make the final roster week 1. I could see him getting called up and possibly making an impact if guys in front of him don’t produce. That’s if we can sneak him on PS

Maybe they’ll end up like Sherfield with 60 catches in 4 years. I’m crossing my fingers.

I wouldn’t cut Shakir for Sherfield. Who has the better chance to become a consistent contributor moving forward? Probably not the guy in his 5th year on his 4th team.

Like to see the total of attempts that determine these percentages. Help put more into perspective. Bills finish drives off away from the goal line more than any other team, atleast I thought they did.

The O needs to get better in these situations. It’s on Dorsey, he’s gotta improve and I think he can. When you’re comparing Chiefs and bills in these situations you shouldn’t be focusing on Allen and Mahommes, you should be focusing on Reid and Dorsey.

Is it that he has more time or is it that Mahommes gets the ball out very quick because of play design. When I watch the offense it’s like the decision is made pre snap, there is one read and it’s almost always open. Bills got guys running all over yhe endzone snd Allen gotta find an open guy in a smaller area with more defenders.

Maybe he got an ankle injury

“ Its manzier!’

Why would you want extend a guy who had a rough year? It’s not like Gabe hasn’t shined during TC before. He does every summer.

If that the position we should trust McD on then trading up to get a CB in the first that can step in and help the team should be fairly simple right?

Dude look at your post, the top two rounds are in a decline.

While trying to prove one point you ignored another point. Seems like over the past few years the players are getting less time. Which is what most are saying. The players that started more early in McDs tenure had to start because they were basically rebuilding. We got alot out of those guys, they are the backbone of the team right now. Which proves getting them on the field helps their progression Lately guys are not getting on the field as much and there is alot of frustration with why we picked these guys because they ain’t helping the team. Especially with the high picks

Maybe that’s the problem and a reason why we can’t get over the hump with McD. If a guy is slightly better but the other player shows more overall potential it’s more beneficial for the team to get that younger player to full potential at a faster pace.

The secondary was middle of the pack and our rush D was top 5. Fact is Dane was the whipping boy for mediocre QBs on third and long the second half of the season. It was tough to watch.

Do we have 3 good corners or 3bad ones? Dane sucked last year and he seems to be the leader of the pack.

Do all have the ability though? Dane was terrible last year and he seems to be the leading guy. That’s the problem, that’s why some of us are very frustrated. Maybe McD is too worried about Xs and Os and the playbook then just putting the best talent on the field and letting him develop. He’s done it in the past with a few guys.

We’re slowing down his learning process for average play ahead of him. Put the guy on the field that has the potential to help you more in January. Dane is who he is at this point, if Elam doesn’t improve once he starts getting the bulk of the reps you always got Dane to step back in.

I wouldn’t be worried about them trading him, more worried about him just sitting on the roster behind average play and not developing at a fast enough speed for him to help this team. Put him in, he either figures it out or we know we made a mistake. Practice does no show the true story, that’s why McDermott looked like a moron starting Peterman twice.

Seems pretty light for stomping someone’s face in because you didn’t want them on the same elevator.