BananaB

He got injured and didn’t finish the season. He didn’t get beat out, they would not commit to him starting next year and he felt he had already earned the spot.

You do know he walked on to Texas Tech and earned the starting job as a freshman.

Hue is gonna be fired by the bye week...

Until we see more of McCarron do we really know? Tyrod is a great athlete but he isn’t a good QB. Poor sight, poor accuracy and poor decisions. Only thing he did good was run and not turnover the ball. But him playing safe way too much was the reason he never turned the ball over.

Good job.... He played well when he got his opportunity, just not much tape on him. He’s a bigger risk then the other QBs in free agency but it may pay off for us.....

For what, a bag of balls?

And he’s ready to start, which may not be the case with any rookie we draft.

He’s a risk, I get it. But he played solid for a guy in his second season getting his action for the first time.... Part of the reason he hasn’t been considered is because of the risk when so many guys have proved more and have more gametime experience. That can’t be knock on how he played, just teams wanting to be safe. At this point to we have the option of playing it safe? Peterman is the only QB on our roster. The Pats have the best QB in the league, I doubt they’d offer him a starting contract. Brady could retire any year despite wanting to play for 3 or 4 more. They also have a quality backup locked in for 3 years, why even show interest in McCarron? No since speculating on why they are interested in McCarron. All I know is the Pats have proven they are great evaluators of talent.

Such bull ****.... You don’t like him, that’s fine. He played pretty well when Dalton went down for a guy seeing action for the first time. His arm did not look like a problem to me. In his 4 starts he threw 1 pick, that’s TERRIBLE..Had 2 wins and would of had a third if Burflict didn’t !@#$ them. Pretty sure they lost to Denver in OT also. For a team that plays solid defense, McCarron just might be what the doctor ordered.... Don’t we play solid D?

A chance to play.... It’s funny, he was on the Phins for five years and when Tannehill went down they didn’t want him to start. Now we’re targeting to be our bridge QB for our rookie to learn from. LMFAO

You don’t have to target Matt Moore. Call and he’ll come running

Not a great list to be learning from. They’ve all had ups and downs of the bench. Did you see Matt Moore play this year? You’d rather have him start the season? Lol. Hoyer got benched Beardhead this year, then cut. I never asked you if McCarron could be the guy, I asked if there is any guarantee our draft pick will be the guy. There is very little film on McCarron, but he showed some good qualities. And guess what, he spent 4 years behind an actual starter in this league.

Is there a guy left you’d actually want a rookie to learn from? Is there a guarantee that our draft pick actually succeeding in this league? I don’t care who becomes the franchise guy as long as someone steps up. McCarron could be that guy

Sure way to boost his stock with rarely stepping on the field

Best scenario I think. Sure we lost out on some better options but I like the idea of signing a guy who could potentially be more then just a bridge QB. AJ didn’t look out of place in this league when he started a few games a couple years ago, i’m fine with giving him a shot

If it was just that simple... We’re moving up to get a guy but there is no guarantee the guy we pick will be our franchise qb.

They all are terrible.... I can’t even watch that **** anymore. Give me the facts when they come out, that’s all I need to know. More interested with the opinions of the fans on here then the opinions of guys who just watch highlights.

Sammy hasn’t proved much more then Jack ****

They can sign McCarron and still draft a qB, there is no reason they can’t... It would also give them 2 possibilities for long term stability instead of just one. McCarron would get his shot first with smaller window to prove his worth

4 year college starter who spent time behind a quality NFL QB. Has showed alittle upside in his playing time in this league. May not be the answer, but he could be. And if we are drafting a QB we hope can be the answer, that’s two guys who show promise and one of them is ready to start week #1.... I don’t see the problem. They are gonna have to pay him a bit but it ain’t my money.

McCarron is a bit risky for that money, but other then Cousins who has the biggest upside in the FA QBs? Which one has possibility of giving us long time security? I’d say McCarron would edge Bridgewater right now after his injury. We can still draft a guy. Drafting a bridge QB for a short period of time waiting on a draft pick gives us one option for long time security. McCarron and Bridgewater along with a draft pick give us two. At this point I don’t care the answer comes from, just want someone to step up so we can forget about this position for a few years.

You think one of Taylor WRs can average over 6 catches a game after watching him make poor decisions for 3 years? He’ll be lucky to get 100 targets let alone a 100 catches

Landry won’t be hitting the hundred receptions this season.

If Taylor is starting Landry production won’t match his pay cheque. Doesn’t seem like a guy who will keep his mouth shut if he ain’t getting targeted either.

People have him locked into Cleveland because of Hue, but a 1-31 team isn’t gonna attract a lot of guys who are getting interest from other teams.... McCarron will be one of those guys. He’s gonna get an opportunity to start for a better team and he’ll get a lot more praise for winning then losing. I doubt he picks Cleveland.