Stank_Nasty

right. becuz I havnt had this same handle since BBMB days or anything........... somebody starts calling out stupid remarks and all of a sudden he's a banned poster. I've honeslty routinely got along with everyone on this new board other than you 2. you guys are just on another wave length. its mind blowing.

no. JM actually wants tyrod as a long term answer. I don't. I wanted a qb at 10 last year. but when people say things as absurd as what you spew onto a keyboard I cant help myself I guess. the funny thing is that you cant even understand how somebody like me could talk about his positives but still wants a better qb. you just go to your default, "must be a tyrod fan" bull crap.

whats does that even mean? lets blame tyrod for that too I guess?

I love how you skip topics once you realize how stupid the initial statement was about padding stats in that game.... you're seriously just the worst, dude.

drove them down into FG range before a HORRIBLE reverse all derailed the drive. and you are seriously gonna sit here and blame him after 390 and 3td and the go ahead score with a minute left? seriously? SERIOUSLY? i'm done man. that honestly speaks volumes about you when it comes to him.

when he made the shady comparison it was in regard to the fact that somebody said tyrods style was too elusive to go good in the snow. the guy merely pointed out that shady's hallmark is being elusive.

that's seriously all you have to say to that? you just say i'm a taylor homer? are you freaking 12 dude? when Ive said numerous times I want a young qb in here to start. you call a go ahead td with a min left and then what should have been the go ahead score in OT padding stats..... you really don't get how stupid that is, do u?

PADDING STATS!!!!!???? he drove them down for the go ahead score with 1 min left!!! then he drives down in 0T for what could have been a game winning FG. and you call that padding stats???? this is another level of STUPID. 390 total yds and 3 tds. gets the go ahead score with a min left. gets them into position for a game winner and you say padding stats??? you seriously are gonna put that game on him??? dude. words cant even describe how absurd that is. 390 total yds. 3 td. go ahead score with 1 min left. it SHOULD have been enough. period. he played at an elite level that day. and the fact that you can sit there and say otherwise says all I really need to know. you 2 guys are honestly on another level. its hilarious. I don't even like going to bat for the guy becuz I've been ready to move on since last year. but when people say crap this idiotic I just cant help myself.

I've been fully aware of your opinion for awhile..... while you're entitled to it. its awful. so you are saying we lost that game becuz of his play? it wasnt the defense? becuz if that's what you are saying then.... just wow.

no. if you support him then you support nothing but 60 yd passing days and sacks and that's all he'll ever give you. DUH.... I've seen 2 people claim webb was better today. MY GOD MAN. like I said. I've been ready to move on since last offseason but some of what the people say around here is absurd.

you're fine... I got what you were saying...... there are serious comprehension issues around here. people are very sensitive about pointing out the few positives in taylors game. makes them feel dirty.

eh. I've been over taylor since last year. I wanted Watson or mahomes at #10. but I understand that right now I think he probably gives us a slightly better chance than the rookie. as for orton? he wouldn't have faired any better in the win/loss column. he had a top 5 behind him that bailed out hacketts vaunted "run, run, pass" offense. in fact I would argue either of taylors years in 15 or 16 paired with that defense would have been an 11 or 12 win team. but its dumb to even bother thinking of that crap.

100%. but for now i'll take the one that limits mistakes and at least keeps the ball long enough for our runner to do some damage. people wanna talk about how we wouldn't have won the SD game with either qb. well the one freaking drive where SD wasn't getting ints plops into their laps we actually drove right down and scored a td. so ya, those INT's were huge. I know damn sure one of our qb's wouldn't have been gifting the other team short fields....... the defense has come around a bit. so i'll take the guy I know isn't gonna give the game away and has the ability, when he's actually on point, to play smart efficient ball with the occasional huge play. also agree 100%. dennison is a large part of the problem.

this is why I chuckle at the people saying we need to evaluate Peterman. neither guy will be starting next year. this whole play for the future mantra is just coming from people that would say anything to not see taylor play again. if either is starting for the bills next year we will be in trouble.

until we get a franchise guy the backup will always be the most popular guy..... whats hilarious to me is people trying to downplay the int's and compare tyrods sacks to them. that being said, I thought Peterman played solid ball in those conditions the other day..... but i'm dreading the thought of him playing in nice weather with a green light to throw the football again.

are you saying you blame taylor for the 2nd loss to them last year? becuz that would say a lot about anyone if they were actually saying that.

lol. webb went 2-6 with an AWFUL pick and you spew this garbage. good lord..... and I've said numerous times i'm done with tyrod. I wanted a qb at 10 last year. but this garbage right here says way more about you than it does me. I say a guy that went 2-6 and had an awful pick isn't as good as taylor and you categorize that as me being in the taylor fan club? dude you're on another level.

this is just over the top and false. and speaks volumes to me about where your head is at on the subject. good talk, friend.

he did a couple nice things yesterday. but what on earth has he done to show he wont start tossing picks again once the weather is nice and he has a green light? dude. I don't care who starts. I don't want either qb'ing the bills next year. but how on earth could anyone think that he's earned it after 5 picks in one freaking half and then couple of nicely thrown balls to our towering wr in man coverage yesterday? give me a freaking break.

right.... becuz the fins are so good..... so good, in fact, that earlier in the year you said they would probably beat us with their 2nd stringers in week 17 becuz they would be sitting their starters for the playoffs!

right. this is what I heard before the chargers game.... sorry if a snow game in which he hit a couple of jump balls to Benjamin doesn't help sway me.

right. I don't think it did anything that should sway the coaches in one way or the other. if they viewed tyrod as the starter beforehand they still should now. I personally don't care who starts as long as they can stumble into wins becuz neither will be the future for the team going into next year anyway..... this whole "start Peterman for the future" movement is comical to me. I pray, even if he plays on par with tyrod, that they don't view him as the future. I think mostly that's just people that hate taylor so bad they wanna find more excuses to see Peterman.

right? new definition to the saying "having your blinders on"

well I personally was in mexico the last week. got back.... and sure enough the same narrative from the same handful of people.

yesterday? in that weather? yes. I think tyrod should be starting if healthy. but Peterman did fine yesterday. to not take that storm into account is just absurd. that was unlike anything I've ever seen.