Stank_Nasty
-
Posts
5,443 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Stank_Nasty
-
-
2 minutes ago, Dadonkadonk said:
Fournette has 268 NFL carries in his rookie season, an injured quad, and a 3.4 YPC in month of December. If he does that on Sunday, Bills win by 7+. It's about stopping the run on Sunday.
Right. I feel like both fan bases are saying the same exact thing about the other team. Stop the run and make the qb try and win it. Whichever team can get that done wins IMO
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Steptide said:
I think the biggest advantage the bills have is more coaches with playoff/superbowl experience. The jags have a great defense, but for some reason I don't feel like the playoffs are too big for the bills. On the other hand, I feel like they are too big for the jags. Maybe I'm just too optimistic
Jags db’s will get all the hype this week but bortles against our hawking db’s has the ability to make or break this game. Bortles has 5 picks his last 2 games and if we can do one thing on d it’s pick it off.
-
1
-
-
5 minutes ago, ShadyBillsFan said:
Agenda? OK jm2009 Junior
Who's agenda? The Taylorites or the Anti Taylor crowd?
He is what he is. Not great enough!!! He is supposed to be improving nor regressing.
you literally said the other day got ticked when you saw the thread title that said "taylor is a playoff qb" and yet you don't put yourself in that group?
honestly dude..... since the mid season troubles I would consider you and maybe 2 or 3 others the ring leaders.... you gotta take a step back and look in the mirror man. your takes on taylor are downright obnoxious at points. you grasp onto the smallest most awful details in your arguments against him. its bad.
and you're right. he needs to be improving. he's not. that's why i'm fine with trying to find another qb IF IT MAKES SENSE. and even if by some fat chance he wins this week and they retain him I STILL want a qb early in the draft and will be very upset if it doesn't happen. the problem with you is he's not nearly as bad as you argue and that's why you and a couple others always reference a handful of games and that's about it.
-
1 minute ago, SaviorPeterman said:
If you want to disregard the 5-2 start and ignore 3 game losing streak and use the 4-2 logic sure, but who did the 4 wins come against?
Miami x 2 (and both games game down to stopping them after an onside kick, including last week against Dolphins 3rd string QB).
Indy (it took a reversed 2 point conversion and overtime to beat another horrible team)
KC (quality win for sure but they were in the midst of a 4 game losing streak when we beat them)
Bottom line though I'm not arguing the fact we made the playoffs, it's obviously a great thing. But take away what was essentially a hail mary pass by Andy Dalton and we having a much different conversation right now. But you can't say the BIlls earned this because it was out of their hands in week 17 even with the win against the Dolphins.
they 100% earned it. don't be absurd. they did enough this season. ravens didn't. they earned it. ravens didn't.
and you have a lot of nerve downplaying the fins games after the way you've spouted off in favor of them all year. make up your mind..... after all.... you're rarely wrong about these things! LOLOLOOL
-
20 minutes ago, ShadyBillsFan said:
Maybe I did. I said what I said and meant what I said.
The Defense improved over last season. The Offense ..... the jury is still out. No, actually its in - I see pluses and minuses. more heave on the minus side.
Buffalo vs NE 2017 .... H 3-23 (ouch it hurts to type that) and A 16-37 [I nailed the game score prediction on the nose for NE*]
Buffalo vs NE 2016 .... A 16-0 (w/o Brady and injured 3rd stringer) and H 25-41
Improved Defense and poorer Offense.
3 points AT HOME!!!!
well I totally agree the defense improved a bit and the offense has regressed. but I refuse to nit pick games and base my arguments off such small sample sizes to support agendas, so I cant really ever take you too seriously. as you do it quite a bit... have a nice day.
-
6 minutes ago, SaviorPeterman said:
We most certainly backed in. This team went 4-5 in their final 9 games including an ugly 3 game losing streak and 2 lopsided Pats losses in which the offense scored a combined 12 points.
Also we did not control our destiny in week 17 and was pure luck the Bengals converted a 4th and long and took it for a score against the Ravens.
But again, it really don't matter how we got to the playoffs. At least the drought is finally over and things finally went this team's way. And regardless what happens against the Jags this regime won't have that hanging over their heads even if they fail to get back to the playoffs next year.
dude. you're so far gone.... 4-2 over the last 6 weeks. you are going all the way back to freaking week 8 just to try and prove a dumb point.... they started hot. they lost 3 in a row middle of the season and then bounced back to snatch the playoffs with a late surge. that's literally nothing close to backing in.
while we're on the pure luck train why don't we claim big bens last game drive to beat the ravens 4 weeks ago was also the only reason we are in. or maybe a loss they suffered back in September..... point being, if the Dalton play happens 3 weeks ago nobody is peddling that dumb narrative. look at the season as a whole. we did more than they did to get in over the course of 17 weeks. bottomline..... and finishing a season 4-2 after the benching of their qb is ANYTHING BUT BACKING IN. I don't know where you come up with this crap....
pretty soon your gonna be arguing next gen stats will prove somehow the fins can still sneak into the wildcard and blathering on about how good their coaching is.
-
13 minutes ago, SaviorPeterman said:
I've been as down on this team as most pessimistic fans the last 17 years, but the bottom line is they made the playoffs and it really don't matter if they got lucky and backed in so to speak.
To end 17 years of agony and frustration for the city of Buffalo and bills fans worldwide is not to be taken for granted even if this team gets clobbered in Jacksonville.
finishing the season 4-2 after the 3 game meltdown that took us to 5-5 with wins AT arrowhead, in OT in the snow game and then SWEEPING YOUR FINS is anything but backing into the playoffs. that's called stepping up and doing what you need to do. at the end of the day the bills did enough throughout the season and the ravens didn't. bottom line. doesn't matter if it happened the last play of the game or midseason.
they got help but they most definitely did not back into the posteason. not even close.
-
Just now, Tortured Soul said:
Are you selling?
nope... hit the road 3am Saturday!
crazy thing is we got our seats in section 244 for $170 a piece and last night they were going for around $700
-
4 minutes ago, ShadyBillsFan said:
Amen to that.
The QB can give us 2 sub 50 QB ratings but the D isn't allowed to have 2 stinkers to match?
HippoCrazy
He was responding to a post in which I also said the offense was bad and even though I didn’t think the d was very good it was still better than the offense as whole over the year.
So maybe read read what I posted first. If this is in fact still in response to what I said.
-
3 minutes ago, twoandfourteen said:
That is certainly true... for QBs that have demonstrated the ability to run passing offenses that are not consistently ranked in the bottom 5 of the entire league.
Taylor has had more sub-100 yard passing days than he has had 300+ yard passing days. But, that's fair if you think sub-100 is an outlier. How about 130 yards passing? Is 130 yards over the course of an entire football game a fair standard of production for a starting QB that has been in the league for 7 years?
Because over the past 3 seasons, Tyrod Taylor has had 7 games of under 130 yards passing. Out of all the veteran starting QBs in the NFL, the closest to that? Blake Bortles & Jared Goff with 4.
But Taylor doesn't throw INTs so who cares about actually moving the football down the field, right?
It’s NOT acceptable. Which is why we need to keep searching for a qb. But the none sense spewed onto this board about a qb that ultimately wins more than he loses while never even having a top ten defense is absurd..... Believe it or not people can still take up for Taylor AND still want an upgrade. I know I know. That’s a hard concept to grasp.
And btw. His ability to protect the football is extremely underrated. We saw how valuable it was during the first 7 weeks of the season when the rest of the team was really clicking.
-
3 minutes ago, FearLess Price said:
Dude we kno we can upgrade at QB and most of us want to draft one in the high 1st round this year but yall exaggerate so much and use garbage confirmation bias stats to try to prove your point, that we gotta dial the convo back to reality. You said starting tyrod could never get us to the playoffs. A lot of you did.
And here we are. Playoffs baby!!
Xrush claimed we wouldn’t win another game with taylor at qb if I’m not mistaken. He’s the definition of living in extremes. It’s awful. Once said that anyone taking up for Taylor must just want to watch 60 ya passing games all season as if that’s all he ever does.
Im with ya. We need a qb. I wanted one last draft early. But the nonesense guys like rush spew on this board about Taylor is pathetic. And the minute you call them on it they label you a Tyrod “lover” and toss the douchey “COT” saying around.
-
This post is missing a huge factor and that’s the fact that this team won the games down the stretch that it needed to in order to get in. Ryan’s teams IMPLODED.
5-5 and it looked like it was all headed south. Mcdermott rallied the Troops and they then went INTO arrowhead for a win, conquered the snow game at long odds and then swept the fins.
Ryans teams weren’t made up of that sort of “MAN STUFF”
-
1
-
1
-
-
4 minutes ago, MAJBobby said:
My protest will still stand as well. Unfortunately i had to break it to go watch the Bills in the playoffs.
But after that it will resume will never watch another game with TT at QB
Good lord.
-
2 minutes ago, Real McCoy said:
Bolded is wrong. The D is pretty much the reason the Bills are in the playoffs
They couldn’t stop the run. They couldn’t rush the passer. 26th in total yds. 18th in points against. They DID he timely turnovers. They had a knack for the big play but they weren’t very good as a whole this season. Better than the offense, I’ll give ya that.
There Was a thread about it yesterday and I agree with it. This team could take the ball away and they didn’t give it away. And yiu’ll Usually win more than you lose that way.
If the talent can catch up with those fundamentals we’re grinning.
-
Just now, Teddy KGB said:
Explain to me why NFL.com has the Bills offense at 29 and defense at 7th please ?
My agenda is using numbers provided by the national football leagues official website?
Break em down for me hotshot.
You were in yards per game for the offense and I have no clue what that other stat is for the defense but let’s try and compare the same stats for each side no matter what we do please.
Or not. Whatever.
-
4 minutes ago, Teddy KGB said:
Yards don’t matter #cot
only losers pass for 300 yards ??
You are seriously awful. Like... just the worst.
3 minutes ago, Teddy KGB said:I said nothing of defense yards but I see how you could interpret that.
Do you understand how stupid it is to use one stat for the offense but a completely different one for the defense. It proves my point that you were doing what I said you were. Nit picking stats to try and prove a good point.
Why in in gods name would somebody reference the bills are ranked 29th in yds and then compare it in the next sentence with a completely different ranking for the defense?
2 reasons.
A) their really dumb and don’t get his enormously idiot that is.
B)they have an agenda and are picking and choosing stats to prove a weak point.
-
1
-
-
12 minutes ago, Teddy KGB said:
Don’t need Tyrod lovers to get all huffy up in here
go to nfl.com. Click on offense, then defense. Offense comes in at 302 ypg for 29th. Defense ranked 7th.
Gonna quote this again so you see how ridiculous you are being. You clearly use YPG for the offense and then say the defense is 7th.
Explain to me where I wa nit picking stats?
-
9 minutes ago, CircleTheWagons99 said:
29th for your boy TT. Which, like i stated in your other post, is not good.
The bills defense is 26th in yds. Pretty good right?
Just now, Teddy KGB said:Lol whose picking stats to make a point now ?
They have them ranked 7th in overall defense by some metric. I’m not 100% sure what the formula is they use.
Go Bills.
Are you this dense?!?! You just said YPG!!!!!
Go and look at your post. You said the bills offense was getting 301 ypg to be ranked 29th and then said the bills d is 7th
i was literally going off what you said. Wow dude.
-
1
-
-
9 minutes ago, Teddy KGB said:
Don’t need Tyrod lovers to get all huffy up in here
go to nfl.com. Click on offense, then defense. Offense comes in at 302 ypg for 29th. Defense ranked 7th.
The bills defense is 26th in yds against.
Just an FYI
so This is 100% false.
-
Just now, CircleTheWagons99 said:
Im done with you too. You attecked the Def to defend TT. You and 26 should just message each other with how good TT is in your minds.
This is like talking with a teenager that can’t take emotion out of it.
The defense wasnt good this year. The offense wasn’t good this year. The team was good at causing turnover and not turning it over and that’s what got us some wins.
-
1 minute ago, CircleTheWagons99 said:
Ok, because 29th out of 32 is good.....
Do you use sense and reason when you read things?
Do certain position have more of an impact or not? Answer the question please.
nowhere did I say it was good. I just simply stated his point was weak becuz comparing the RT or linebackers impact on a game to a qb’s is foolish.
You’re apparently one of this guys that thinks if somebody isn’t bashing Taylor they must think he’s a top ten qb.
-
Could we elaborate on what ranking you are talking about. Becuz they aren’t ranked well in a majority of defensive rankings so I’m assuming you are nit picking a stat to try and make an awful point.
-
5 hours ago, Thurman#1 said:
It won't happen, John.
Not that Tyrod won't play well. He might. He does sometimes. But not consistently. Not the way a team that expects to compete for Lombardis needs.
They know what Tyrod is. One good game won't change anything. It just won't. A season might have, but he's had three chances to do that. A season might have, but a game won't.
Yup. Tyrod was the QB of this team, a team that made the playoffs for the first time in 17 years.
And Jordan Mills was the RT of this team, a team that made the playoffs for the first time in 17 years.
And Vlad Ducasse was the RG of this team, a team that made the playoffs for the first time in 17 years.
And Ramon Humber was ... I could go on, but the point should be clear.
This may be a playoff team but it's not a very good team and starting on it in no way means they want to keep a guy and don't desperately need an upgrade.
At QB, they want a guy who can play from the pocket. They gave Tyrod a chance to show he was that guy and we all saw the results.
The point, while clear what you were trying to do, wasn’t a great one.
Surely you understand some positions are more important and impactful than others. IMO this was a poor attempt to justify moving on.
Heck i’m Not even 100% against moving away from him but let’s not grasp at straws and make weak points to justify doing so.
2 minutes ago, CircleTheWagons99 said:Love really is blind.....
You surely can’t be referring to me. If so you obviously didn’t read my post very well
-
1 hour ago, ShadyBillsFan said:
We move on to the next team.
Those that are 90% or more sold on TT won't change their mind and call those who 100% sure we know is who he is what he is idiots and fools because we won't change our minds.
And both sides look like fools.
I feel like it’s fairly simple. You keep him around if you can’t find a free agent qb that might fit your system better or is more affordable with similar level of play. You still draft your QB NO MATTER WHAT.
That being said... it’s very sad to me that you and others are going to be clamoring to get him out the door even if he and the team get to the divisional round. Thankfully I feel like the staff will be able to use a little more sense than that. The bottom line is he’s just not nearly as bad as you want to think he is. Sorry.
26 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said:Correct. There is no reason to dump Tyrod unless there is truly a better option. It doesn't stop you from drafting a QB but it does give you the luxury of easing them in. Spite is the dumbest reason to do anything.
100% this. I don’t get why people are making it so difficult.
-
1
-
2nd Favorite Playoff Team
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
Anyone playing the pats or “stillers” the 2 most self righteous fan bases I’ve ever encountered.
They literally act as though the teams and fans existence is doing the nfl and America a favor.