billsredneck1

i'm guessing..... 1. darnold 2. barkley or chubb 3. rosen 4. mayfield...bills 12/22/65 5. allen 6. barkley or chubb i'm sticking with the gettleman never trades down thing...and i also think there's a tenative deal with the browns with the framework for such was formed with the tyrod trade. hopefully 4 is not for allen. or...if i'm wrong and the browns take someone other than darnold and the giants take him, we could be looking at big problems....especially if the browns want barkley or chubb at 4.

baker please. i can't see rosen wanting to play here.

i may be way off, but i'd feel safer taking rudolph than allen especially at the cost...although we can afford to let allen sit for at least a year,so....

i think az. would be willing go as far as 7.....and then there's miami sitting in front of us. it could get ugly.

i don't think he gets past 15 az.....and if we wait til 22 bb will jump us in a heartbeat. then we can watch him take over after brady while our later rd. qb sits on the practice sqaud. i can't say he is. i think he very well could turn into a peyton manning passer. either way, no matter who we draft, i want to see a full year of ajm. we can afford to let a rookie develop.

johnny unitas golden arm award? sammy baugh award? led the nation no.1 in passing yds? if he's good enough for pitt. / ne/ n.o etc. to take in the 1st, he's good enough for me to take ahead of them.

this drives me nuts! why can't people get it through their heads that THERE WAS NEVER GOING TO BE A COMPETITION FOR THE STARTING JOB! dalton was their franchise qb...who they were paying as such...who pretty consistently had them in the post season...and there was a coaching/management loyalty to him. it's been broadcasted time and again by interviews with people there with close knowledge of the team. ajm is no slouch. he is going to surprise some people and open some eyes.

but.....we haven't seen enough of chad kelly to call him a bust yet.....

not only that we may get stuck at 12 and look to take him, but teams will look to leapfrog us. we may have to go up a few spots just not to lose him. funny how the perennial playoff teams show more interest in him and yet on this board, he's a loser.

i'll take it. it sounds like a realistic result. since sam, josh and baker gone or unaffordable, that will leave josh allen then rudolph. see also..the vic carucci 1998 thread.

Leighton Vander Esch....LB I guess I went over a lot of heads with the Bryce Paup / Bill Romanowski reference. I probably should have figured half this board would have no clue who those guys were. I confess, I had a couple of wobble pops.

still missing tyrod?

terry tate office linebacker. don't know how to pin this<iframe width="854" height="480" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/RzToNo7A-94" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe>

will be well worth it. sorry for starting a vague type of thread, but he could be the head hunter we need....oops sorry about the head hunter thing....not really....we need a bill romanowski on this team

well i sure wouldn't say you're an know it all...but we signed the starting center from the bengals...we signed trent murphy , who is going to want to be an assassin and resurrect his career and marshall newhouse is better then any rt we've had in years. we still have lorax and milano. tanner could look good....and humber? ajm will make good use of clay and oleary....kb will be healthy and is in a contract year....zay will be much improved and we will draft good speedster. we will also add some good lbs and hopefully one more double team demanding dt. adolphus and shaq should season and hughes should benefit. we will draft starters. not to mention, star may get a fire lit in his ass. with ajm /nate and hopefully baker, we are gonna be a team that nobody wants to come to buffalo to face. if we end up with edmunds/ evans/jefferson...and /or vea /hurst/payne... we are going to be a kick ass team. bank it.

in dunkirk suck this year? it's going to be an exciting team on offense and a vicious d. going to be a great year!

no doubt....i really trust these guys, but there's still that residual sub conscious gut feeling that it will be a whaley type of ....wtf/omg/oh no.... hopefully that goes away after this month.

baker will be a bill...."if you smell what the baker is cookin"...will be the mantra.

fan since oj made 2000. this is the best ,most captivating off season i have ever known. i hope we don't sell the farm for allen, please dear god let us build this roster and have baker mayfield sit for the year while a.j. takes us to the divisional round. then we can have a qb comp. next year or one qb that will get us some big picks.

after the darnold goes 1, and the giants take chubb, we go to no. 4 by giving the browns 12, 65 and next year's 1st. we take baker mayfield. that's due to the tenative agreement with the tyrod trade.

hotrod...nasty nate...can't wait til you come up with some snark nickname for a.j....

in this case, i would lock up rudolph.

i agree. i would not trade up unless baker or allen falls...and then it would be from 7 on. if the qbs fly off the board, i would take rudolph at 12 and keep all my picks. i don't expect any qb we draft would or will need to start this year. as of right now, i am considering ajm the starter with possible franchise ability. i think he has been massively under rated and not one 1st. rd. qb this year had anywhere near the college success as a.j.

the bolded just struck something with me. from now on when i think about qb prospects, i will ask myself.... can this guy come in at least, at some point in year one and competently start? if i think the answer is yes, then in my mind he is a 1st rd. pick....so rosen....yes darnold...yes mayfield...yes rudolph...borderline 1-2 allen ...at least 2 full yrs. before starting material.

tate is imo, under rated as a receiver. he can be a sneaky big play once in a while and deep too.... i'm ok with this,but we gotta get a dt in here at some spot.