Jump to content

bigduke6

Community Member
  • Posts

    2,228
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by bigduke6

  1. 9 hours ago, Bferra13 said:

    I'm torn on this taunting thing. I hate most of the penalties after a big play and showing emotion and celebrating. But flashing a peace sign in a defenders face while the play is still going on should be called. Thats not showing emotion, that's being a duechebag. Literally the definition of taunting. Probably inconsequential, but should be called.

    thing about that "peace" sign was,  it wasnt really about peace,  it was throwing 2 fingers in the Bills' faces,  as in,  we just beat u twice in the playoffs.   thats a douche move by Hill.    should it have been called?  by the letter of the law,  yes.

    • Agree 1
  2. if, in some alternate reality,  Watson had become our QB yesterday,  i personally would have a hard time rooting for my Bills regardless if he wins or not.   at some point u need to take a stand.   the Browns,  in giving Watson the largest fully guaranteed contract ever,  lying about actually investigating the off field problems,  and making the contract so that Watson will barely pay for any suspension time,  have shown us that they are now a win at all cost franchise.  rewarding this person is low class.   i feel for the Browns fans that have morals. 

     

    i honestly hope Baker plays well and rebounds on his next team.    not even a Baker fan,  f the Browns owners.

    Watson is going to need every bit of the 230 mil to pay for his behavior.    

    • Agree 1
    • Awesome! (+1) 1
  3. if i was a browns fan right now i suppose i'd be,  tab bit happy,  and really worried.   if Watson doesnt pan out or the team around him continues to be less than great,   have fun in cap hell for the foreseeable future,  with zero outs.

     

    also kinda funny that the Browns said they needed a more mature QB,  haha have fun with Watson.

     

  4. gl Levi,  u werent as terrible as some here made u out 2 be.    sure hope theres a plan to replace him.   Levi had a tough job as the opposite CB to Tre,  he got alot of work thrown at him just because nobody really wanted to throw at Tre.   Levi was a flag magnet,  some his fault,  most not.   alot of phantom calls against him.   he was a fine #2 for us.

    • Agree 1
  5. not a fan of Baker,   wasnt interested even if we'd had the 1st overall pick.    that being said,   he's a good young QB,  who has played reasonably well until last season when OBJ got back on the field,  and Baker got banged up.    he had all sorts of injuries and tried to power through them last season.    if the Browns are looking to move on mbe theres more to it than what we as fans can see,   ill give Baker a pass for last season tho.

  6. Metcalf is a talent,  a physical specimen.    when hes involved he plays hard,  when he gets discouraged he dogs it.      if he dogs it too much that affects the team, regardless if its his fault or not.    this kind of personality can become a cancer in a lockerroom.   dude may be the best guy ever,   he's got to do his job and be professional consistently,  even when its not working out in his favor.    i dont see it with him yet.   pass.

  7. 2 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

     

    Really?  I saw him as very much in the Steelers QB mold.  A bit shorter and lighter than Big Ben, but basically solid sturdy type with a good arm and some mobility.

     

     

     

    dont disagree with any of this,  just thought mbe he'd end up in NY with Daboll or in Indy with Frank.    thought the Steelers would go with Rudolph and draft a QB.   most likely a bridge QB until the QB they draft is ready.   like i said tho,  good for Mitch and gl.

    • Like (+1) 1
  8. is he actually physical,  in his routes,   true blocking,  or  is he just physical when cheap shotting people?    imo he's a lesser OBJ,  with the same problem,  his mouth.

     

    if he doesnt get the ball enough,  or doesnt feel like hes part of the offense,  or gets shut down too much,  is he going to be a problem?   i dont want that near this team.

     

     

  9. 20 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

    My responses aren’t intended to be snark. They’re simply the reality of the current structure of things. I’ve said it many many times on here that I find it hard to believe that people who I assume are Bills fans wouldn’t want to spread the cost of the stadium out across as many people as possible, because if not you better get ready to pay a boatload for each and every ticket.  You can continue to scream into the darkness if you’d like. Thanks 

    your first response was indeed snark.........nice try tho.

  10. we arent winning SBs right now cuz of the Chiefs,  and the fact that the AFC is loaded with good young QBs.   if we were in the NFC right now i believe we'd be in the SB every year.    we need homefield throughout the playoffs,  mbe a tad bit more impact on the defensive line.  beyond that there really isnt much to do.    nobody can really stop the Chefs when they dont let them.     terrible thing is,  its only gonna get worse as the arms race heats up in the AFC,  already seeing it with early FA moves.      there is no room for error next season,  every winnable game has to be won.     we cant have an Indy or Jags loss type game next season.

     

    as much as people want to load up the D,  i dont think yer gonna stop the Chefs,  best u can do is hope to outscore them offensively imo.

  11. tired of the ultra wealthy needing "help" so they can save money and make more.   i understand the leverage NFL owners have over their areas,  but cmon,  this has to stop.    the wealthy in this country hate socialism yet take that free money whenever and wherever they can.    tired.    

     

    we are a unique situation being a small market team, still shouldnt have to "donate" a dime to keep the team here.    all we should have to do is support the product by watching,  going,  and buying merchandise.   the rest should be on the owners,  just like the other 98% of business in this country.

     

    also,  not a big fan of the explosion of legalized gambling lately.   i dont partake so i guess it really doesnt affect me all that much, but it does affect society negatively overall.   that being said,  no,  the gambling business' should not pitch in towards another business owners need for free money,  neither should the state.   that gambling money should be put towards all the real problems that need correcting,  not towards an organization that just needs to make more $$$$ by cutting their own costs.    

     

    what happened to pulling yourself up by your own bootstraps,  or free market,  or  all the other bs slogans we've been fed for years by our corporate "leaders" ?.     what they really mean is,  shut up,  give us money,  u do the work,  while they profit,  and wait for them to trickle a little $$$$ down to u.

×
×
  • Create New...