SoCal Deek

It’s the same thing you see in basketball. The coach wants to see how the offense is lined up prior to inbounding the ball. There’s no telling if it works to your benefit.

Huh? Physics isn’t your strong suit.

Answer: The refs are terrible. Period

Ugh! A roof neither CREATES nor DISAPPEARS snow or rain. There will be less of either inside the stadium by exact percentage that the roof covers when looking straight down on the bowl from an airplane.

This same thing happened to the Bills a year or two ago. I agree with you! Just because the ball touches the shoelace of a guy who is touching out of bounds it should NOT make ball be ruled out of bounds.

If the wind blows the snow, or rain, into the downwind part of the bowl that means the upwind side will be shielded. You only get snowdrifts on one side of your house.

No. The roof will cover the entire upper deck.

The cross sections somebody shared a few months back weren’t anywhere close to 70%. Maybe closer to 40 or 50% tops.

What this entire dialogue demonstrates is that the NFL has a SERIOUS personnel issue. They’re running a league where players are dropping like flies and yet they force the Teams to jump through ridiculous ancient rules to hamstring their rosters.

It may have already been said but looking at the stat sheet, Sherfield wasn’t targeted even once yesterday. Same thing as what we’ve seen for Gabe occasionally. So, is the receiver or is it the offensive play design?

FYI: Parking at SoFi stadium is around $80 on any given week. (Ridiculous)

Three passes….three and out…again

Totally unprepared as always

Nice strategy McD 🙄

That’s it Bass stinks!

Hey Joe Brady……RUN THE FREAKING BALL!!!!

Let me see if I understand. According to you the State of New York doesn’t care about the University of Buffalo, which has to be one of the largest employers in the entire region? And one whose assets and property holdings literally dwarf those of the Buffalo Bills. Interesting.

I’m not the least bit frustrated. Just one question though…..What’s lake effect snow? 😁

That’s certainly a lot of words. Not sure what most of them have to do with this conversation but there are a lot of them.

The opposite. The State should’ve dictated that the stadium be on the campus for all of the reasons that I outlined earlier.

And once again…a mistake. If the State was putting up so much of the money, and I have no problem with them doing so, they should’ve been more in the term/dictation drivers seat.

I’m sure it’s been said but this looks exactly like the Bills beat down on the Cowboys, just substitute Cook for Jones.

If true somebody at UB should lose their job then. The opportunity to have an NFL quality indoor multi-purpose venue on your campus is something that should NOT have been passed up.

Is that you Taylor? You do know the Chiefs aren’t coming for an entire week, right?

I still believe the smarter move would’ve been to build a new, fan centric, modest dome stadium at Amherst where it would have been: 1. shared with UB for much higher usage 2. the State already owns the land 3. plenty of parking on weekends 4. out of the snow belt 5. loads of tailgating space 6. decent existing highway access with proximity to Canadian fans 7. easily justified State $ contribution But….it’s just me