Jump to content

SoCal Deek

Community Member
  • Posts

    21,771
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by SoCal Deek

  1. I live just outside of Los Angeles County. Yesterday it was exposed that her DAUGHTER (who goes by her maiden name) was one of the authors of the report she cites as reasons for masking requirements. She needs to step down immediately! By any reasonable stretch this a huge conflict of interest. Unbelievable.
  2. I didn’t say it was a Grand Jury! Ugh! The problem is that there isn’t a defense, legitimate questioning, or even balanced inquiry. This is NOT a hearing of anything! It’s become a presentation. There’s a HUGE difference. This is essentially a smear campaign being played out on national television at taxpayers expense. You really don’t see how wrong this is? Really?
  3. Well that’s what the trial would determine. Unfortunately there won’t be one. And that’s my problem with the entirety of the Select Committee. They’re akin to a Grand Jury (as Tbs correctly cited a few weeks ago) but they’re doing it in public, which is a terrible miscarriage of our legal system, regardless of party or affiliation.
  4. I doubt it. This would come to a ‘standard of care’ case. The question would be what would another officer have done if/when faced with the same set of circumstances. And we know exactly what they would have done because there were dozens of other officers there who didn’t discharge their weapon even as a warning shot. I’m guessing the jury would find for the victim…and pretty darn quickly. Again none of this makes the victim right, but the officer is clearly guilty of negligence.
  5. Come on Goose There's tons of video showing evidence to the contrary. If this officer was actually on trial the victim’s family would have a great case for wrongful use of force, and I believe you know it. (That doesn’t make the victim innocent of any wrong doing.)
  6. Keep it civil Tibs. This is a message board….not a street fight.
  7. Now do Chuck. And while you’re at it please point to part of Trump’s speech thar called for violence….which is the generally accepted distinction between a protest and a riot.
  8. And you know this because when just a few weeks before, when a different mob was actually physically assaulting officers in front of the President’s office building, Trump ordered them to open fire? Can you show us the video of that speech?
  9. You can keep playing the role of the disinterested observer Goose. And you have to know that I generally appreciate your take on things…and quite often agree. But it’s okay to give in on a small point once in a while. She was in the wrong that day, but she definitely should not have been killed.
  10. I am not defending the mob. But I am blaming the officer for shooting her. Please tell me you understand the difference.
  11. Not sure what you’re getting at here. The old Texas Stadium, with the hole in the roof, had covered seats and an open air field. These days they can even engineer it without the trusses that spanned the hole. Easy peasy!
  12. I dare the committee to show that video! This farce of a propaganda machine has to stop.
  13. Oh boy! Where to begin. So you’re saying during the next out of control protest, you’re good with the police indiscriminately shooting into the crowd, picking off an unarmed person to ‘make an example’ or something, something. So it would’ve been okay to shoot the protestors to keep them from breaching the doors of the Supreme Court, or the White House fence? Come on Goose…even you have to know that the officer should not have fired.
  14. I missed it. Was this gal in the Beast too? Or was she another friend of a friend of a friend.
  15. First Liam Nissan and now David Axelrod? They’re bringing out the big guns! 🙄
  16. I love Liam Nissan…but I have to admit I generally don’t seek him out for his opinion of political events.
  17. Now let’s ask Nancy’s attorney the same question. It was her office they were entering. The President works down the street!
  18. I guess I’m showing my age. When I grew up in WNY the stadium was filled with actual football fans…not just people who went there to drink there own beer in a big parking lot. I’m hoping that the return of a consistent contender will help to lure the fans back.
  19. What do you want to bet the missing text messages have literally nothing to do with the events of the day?
  20. Now post one the democrats during the Summer of Mostly Peaceful Riots Then do one of Chuckie in front of the Supreme Court
  21. Thanks 716....but that's not the point I was making. The big dome proponents on here were trying to sell it as a multi-use venue. I think they just really wanted to sit inside. The only way that made any sense, if it ever did at all, was to put the stadium downtown. Once that ship had sailed back down to Orchard Park, the dome discussion lost it's central mission statement. I personally believe the new stadium will be fabulous, so long as it caters to the football fans that have always been the core of the Buffalo Bills faithful. It has to be a great place to watch a football game....period!
×
×
  • Create New...