SoCal Deek

As with others on here you are completely missing the point of Tucker’s reporting. He is NOT trying to excuse the rioters. He’s exposing the Select Committee’s cherry picked narrative.

With all due respect, having Congress produce a television show that flat out lies to the American public in order to advance a narrative aimed at castrating their political opponents is hardly nothing. This thing makes Trump’s phone call to the President of Ukraine look like a preschool production.

The most important example of the clips Tucker showed was NOT of the protestors, but was the edited clip of the congressional representatives running from the chamber. The clips were edited to make it look as if only one member was running away, but the entire clip reveals that not only was he not the ONLY member running away, but he was NOT in the lead. In fact, all of the members were following the direction of the Capitol Police and the member in question was actually bringing up the rear. Shame on the Committee and on anyone who listened to a word they had to say after seeing that example! Don’t believe or agree with me. Consider this….a jury just sent Murdoch away for LIFE for lying about video evidence.

You’ve really got to be kidding. Yet another person who’s utterly lost. Sad.

Believe what exactly? All he said was that the Committee clearly lied to the American people. And they did!

So does this mean Peterman still has a chance?

Thanks for the great explanation. You guys know a lot more about this stuff than I will ever hope to.

Once again you are missing the ENTIRE point. Tucker isn’t attempting to ‘try the case’ on his TV Show. He’s merely showing that what you were allowed to see by the so-called Select Committee was incredibly edited to present a one-sided narrative to the nation…without any opposition. I pray to God that you NEVER sit on a jury, as you appear to be the sort that would recommend going into deliberations right after the prosecution rests.

With all due respect, you’re missing the point of the thread. The J6 Committee clearly edited the tapes to present a selective narrative to the public, and passed them off as facts. You can see that, right? It doesn’t make what any of the protesters did that day right or make them blameless but it says a ton about that total sham of a politically motivated committee.

Yikes. You’re completely lost.

Quick! Someone tell him Frazier is taking a sabbatical. Or…maybe that’s why he chose unfollow the Bills. 😳

I still can’t help but wonder what Adams is thinking having left Green Bay to go play with Carr, his college roommate, in Vegas.

I really don’t care where or when they get them but I’d be thrilled if the Bills selected a couple of young, stud Offensive Guards to anchor the O Line for the duration of Josh’s contract. I’ve said it before, it’s not sexy, but it’ll make everything else so much easier for many years to come.

I have zero Super Bowl expectations. The Bills are a very good team, but definitely not a great team. It’s fun to watch them be competitive week after week but I’ve yet to see anything that shows me they’re ready to win a championship. (Sorry)

I think often overlooked is the fact that if Brady was still in NE, Frazier would’ve been gone well before last week.

Anybody see the movie Easy A? One of a number of classic lines is when the teacher asks Emma Stone “when are you kids going to learn not to post your every waking thought online”? Yikes, does that apply to this ‘doctor’!

They aren’t necessarily greedy. If you never learn how to handle money, it makes absolutely no difference how much of it you have. Words to live by!

Priority One…..fix the Offensive Line! It may not be sexy but it’ll quietly pay dividends for as long as Josh is a healthy Buffalo Bill. (Let’s first see what Free Agency has in store.)

Here’s my criteria for the Bills Top Pick: Someone who’s going to start and be on the field for virtually every down…period. I’m done with rotational First Round Draft Picks. Their impact is entirely too limited for the level of improvement the Bills are going to need in 2023.

That isn't the point he was making.

Thanks. Who would negotiate the drug prices? I've considered drug prices to be somewhat of a side issue to the core healthcare debate. My personal opinion is that we are way, way over-medicated.

And then….poof….Crimea became part of Russia, while Barry stood by and did nothing. Funny how that worked out.

So given all of that, are you then a proponent of universal healthcare? Or does that just bring with it a new and different set of problems?

I may ultimately be proven wrong but the safety position is way down my list of roster concerns going into 2023.

Well if insolvency is real, then you can’t stay ahead of the bill collector forever. Someone must have a plan. I’ve often wondered whether at some point the cost simply outpaces American’s ability to pay for it, and the seemingly unlimited level of care rapidly declines. Let’s face it, our standard of care looks nothing like what it did just a few decades ago. When you see a photo of hospital back then, it was pretty much just a bed and a nurse standing by.