-
Posts
21,501 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by SoCal Deek
-
I’m not going to take you as an expert on the Republican Party but yes it’s true that the President always has an influence. With that said, Trump was essentially non existent prior to 2015, and nobody gave him a shot in 2016. The rest of my comments still stand and it’s abundantly clear that you know pretty much nothing about the movement he’s inspired. By the way I noticed how you changed my comment about Trump not calling out Left leaning voters, to YOUR words of “private citizens”….which is NOT what I said. Nice try though!
-
AJ Klein Expected to Sign with Bills
SoCal Deek replied to Warriorspikes51's topic in The Stadium Wall
I’m aware…that’s why I laughed at your post. (Although that emoji can be taken in different ways.) This offseason has gone almost exactly as I saw it going. Beane had very little wiggle room unless he wanted to risk tearing it down, to build it up. I think OBD chalked 2022 up to injuries, weather, etc. They’ve decided to let it ride for one more year. I’d still love for someone to post and pin a summary. -
When we were kids we lived in a Tonawanda subdivision called Green Acres. We were sure that the show would be about our neighborhood…but nope! It was not to be. 🙁
-
Thanks for the effort Kemp….seriously. Where I believe most on the Left go wrong is that they think the allegiance is to Trump, the person. Right or wrong, the allegiance you’re seeing is from those who feel they’ve gotten and are getting screwed by a political class, and their media lapdogs. If you’ll notice, Trump rarely if ever attacked the Left leaning voters. His focus is always on establishment politicians, lifer bureaucrats, and the media that run cover for them. He is not prone to calling citizens deplorable, nor has ever written them off. On the contrary, his famous line to them was ‘what do you have to lose?’. So…in short the ‘cult’s’ allegiance is NOT to Trump, the person, but rather to his underlying message. Right or wrong.
-
AJ Klein Expected to Sign with Bills
SoCal Deek replied to Warriorspikes51's topic in The Stadium Wall
I’ve actually been thinking the same thing. I guess this is what it looks like when you’re handcuffed by the salary cap. (This Board still hasn’t come to grips with that economic reality.) I’m sure it’s on here somewhere but I’d love to see somebody pin and post a summary of all our roster, losses, cuts, and signings by position with a just a little over a week now before the Draft. -
So everyone gets their own urinal! 👍
-
It’s now ‘weird’ for people to gather in prayer for a public figure who is ill? No offense, but I hope I never get to the point where I either assume or feel that way.
-
The issue is whether a Doctor or School Advisor might be going rogue and enticing under age ‘patients’ to seek treatment without parental consent. When this becomes a habit of care, it could be opined that a governmental agency needs to step in. At that point it seems it should not be left to a single child’s parents…again, no?
-
I’m not sure where this ‘take’ is coming from. Out of curiosity, I went on the church’s website and found there is ZERO charge for tickets to the event. They appear to simply want people to gather to pray for Mrs Pegula and want to make sure the crowd doesn’t overflow the building. I see nothing wrong with that. Do you know something else?
-
Ask the woke to define CULT…😂
-
YELLING? Who’s YELLING? 😉
-
I mean…really? Come on!
-
And, as I mentioned in another thread, Eli Ricks is the son of my wife’s best friend. Not sure if that’s a traditional measurable, but it is true. 👍
-
Trump’s Post Presidency—What Will He Do?
SoCal Deek replied to Trump_is_Mentally_fit's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
I thought the premise was that he OVER valued property to obtain loans against that portfolio. So the civil suit is that the State should’ve been able to use that higher value on taxes? Seems ridiculous. The State assesses property values in a different way than what someone might use as ‘value’ in seeking a business loan. Again, I’m not a lawyer but I refuse to believe that this exact sort of thing has not been looked at by the courts literally hundreds of times in the past. There must be a precedent. And finally, if you’ve ever been involved in a civil suit you’d know that strategy of both the plaintiffs and defense can shift over time. It isn’t a sign of anything. -
Trump’s Post Presidency—What Will He Do?
SoCal Deek replied to Trump_is_Mentally_fit's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Giving a deposition looks bad? Since when? I’m not a lawyer but wouldn’t this case more appropriately be brought by someone who was actually damaged? How was the State or City be damaged by what’s being alleged? -
New stadium cost goes up from $1.4 billion to $1.54 billion.
SoCal Deek replied to cba fan's topic in The Stadium Wall
Exactly. What you’re seeing there is a classic example of the structural properties of reinforced concrete. The concrete works in compression. Meaning it won’t ‘smoosh’ but it cracks easily if you bend it. Whereas the steel reinforcing bars are the opposite. They can bend without snapping but have almost no compressive strength. Put the two together and you have a structure that resists both tension and compression. However…if and when the concrete starts to deteriorate and water gets to the steel, it will rust, and then lose all of its tensile strength…and eventually the whole thing fails completely. How’s that for a quick structural engineering lesson? -
Governor Abbott seeking to pardon Daniel Perry
SoCal Deek replied to SCBills's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
You bet. It happens to everyone. No worries Tibs. -
Governor Abbott seeking to pardon Daniel Perry
SoCal Deek replied to SCBills's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
As BillStime would say….”This should age well.” -
New stadium cost goes up from $1.4 billion to $1.54 billion.
SoCal Deek replied to cba fan's topic in The Stadium Wall
I was of course joking about the arches. Stadium design has gone through many aesthetic trends over the last century. There was a time when they were built to resemble classical buildings. Think of the LA Coliseum and Soldier Field. That eventually gave way to a more utilitarian aesthetic where the focus was on the field itself and much less on the ‘building’. Some were successful and some have already been demolished. Rich Stadium, as I still call it, would fit into this category. It has no architectural adornment of any kind, but it does have very elegant, non-stylistic lines…which is why in my opinion it’s not considered to be out of date by most who review these things. Fast forward, and the newest stadiums are back to being ‘buildings’ again but now with a decidedly forward looking aesthetic. Much different from even the newest baseball stadiums which typically draw from a more nostalgic looking aesthetic.