SoCal Deek

Obviously: Dee Fensive Lineman C. Orner-Back Write it down!

The Colts were the best parallel I could find. I honestly can’t recall what if anything changed to get them past and over the Patriots with Brady back then…but you have to admit this looks an awful lot like the present Bills and the Chiefs with Mahomes. Maybe nothing changed. Maybe Manning just finally broke through. I hope Josh is talking with Peyton over this summer.

Let me write that one down.

We’ve turned a corner now. Unbelievable. Bring it on!

Thanks The two teams are obviously not the same but they’re eerily similar. The original OP was based on how we as fans should think of the Bills. Not being a Colts fan I’m not sure I can say how they felt when they kept getting to a point only to lose to the Patriots year after year…but they did finally get over that hurdle, and they didn’t do it by tearing the team apart and starting over. One thing the Colts had was their infamous triplets of Manning, Harrison, and James at RB. I’m praying the Bills can find a running game to pair with Allen and Diggs. Go Bills

Did you look at my historical summary of the Colts run under Manning? It’s amazingly similar to the current Bills. They swooned one time in that run (maybe two) but ‘down’ years? Not really.

By the way…in those years the Colts coach was Tony Dungy. He was widely considered to be an ‘high character’ guy. Anybody seeing the many similarities here?

Interesting comment and I’ve seen this before. What are your thoughts on the long term evolution of the Bills defensive alignment (and the NFL as a whole). Will McD stick with two LBs or start moving to the more traditional 4-3?

Exactly! I guarantee that Beane has studied NFL history, and has looked closely at what the Colts (and others) did once they got their franchise quarterback. It’s also interesting to note that during the build up to their championship season the Colts had just lost two playoff games in a row to the Patriots before beating them in the third rematch. It all sounds VERY familiar! I cannot recall what the Colts did to finally beat their playoff nemesis. What missing piece did they add in 2006? Maybe somebody on here knows.

That’s why I looked into the history of what I consider similar teams. And the Colts appear to the closest parallel to the Bills considering they had Peyton Manning during that era. They won consistently during that but couldn’t get over the proverbial hump until Year 5 of their streak. It’s also interesting to note that they continued their regular season success for four more years after their championship season although never won it again. Starting in 1999 the Colts went: 13-3 10-6 6-10 Missed playoffs 10-6 12-4 12-4 14-2 12-4 Super Bowl champions 13-3 12-4 14-2 Lost Super Bowl 10-6 Looks pretty familiar huh?

I did a bit more research and the early 2000s Indianapolis Colts had a very similar playoff history and regular season win percentage as the current rendition of the Buffalo Bills. After being eliminated in the playoffs for four straight seasons the Colts then won the Super Bowl in 2006. So there’s hope! 👍

Thanks....I looked it up and the Steelers and Saints qualify but the Seahawks had a year in the middle of that run where they didn't make the playoffs.

With all of this I believe what you’re seeing is Beane coming to terms with their present cap situation. (Not that he didn’t already know.) He doesn’t have a ton of money to throw around and he knows he’s got more than enough holes to fill. Looks to me like they’re going to roll the dice with the guys they know, pray for less injuries next season, and use the draft to replace those that left for ‘greener’ pastures. It’s becoming clear that they are NOT in a rebuilding mode.

I’d be really curious on how many teams in the Super Bowl era have made the playoffs four straight years with an equal or better winning percentage but didn’t get to a Super Bowl. There’s gotta be someone on here who can research that.

You ever see the movie Major League? Maybe he needs glasses. 😉

Wow…somebody on here predicted this just a few hours ago when the Campbell acquisition seemed to fizzle. Well done!

Thanks a lot Hawk. I think I saw that guy wandering around MY street now. 😂

I have to agree with Doc on this one. If as you say it’s not about us then what does Trump have to do with it? You’re kinda tying yourself in a pretzel here. I know you don’t like Trump but if everything isn’t about us then it’s also true that everything isn’t about Trump. Give it a rest already!!!

There are many issues involved here. For example, if this person was being prescribed mentally invasive drugs by a doctor…what was the doctor thinking? Heck, you’re not allowed to drive home from a colonoscopy!

Answer…my comments. They’re all intended for the better good of society as a whole. 😉

I was actually intrigued by the option of putting the new stadium on the Amherst campus and sharing it with UB….which the State obviously owns.

Thanks for sharing that deep clinical analysis. 🙄 Keep avoiding it.

Sure it is Hawk. Ignore the obvious elephant in the room. And just who was this person receiving psychiatric care? Hmmmmm? Sure it is Hawk. Ignore the obvious elephant in the room. And just who was this person receiving psychiatric care? Hmmmmm? Sure it is Hawk. Ignore the obvious elephant in the room. And just who was this person receiving psychiatric care? Hmmmmm? Sorry….I have no idea why it repeated my post three times.

I cannot believe you guys are yapping back and forth about guns or no guns for hours on end. The story behind this particular shooting is NOT the guns used. That’s not the distinguishing characteristic. The story is that a trans person wrote a murder/suicide letter and proceeded to carry it out. What’s happening here? Carry on.

That’s how many days Trump was in office. It’s not like Putin didn’t have plenty of time to attack during any one of those 1,460 days. Nope….he waited until the incredibly weak Joe Biden sat behind the desk. Like everything else, this is NOT complicated.