SoCal Deek

Then Goose claims it isn't ‘worth’ prosecuting over a stapler. So how’s it worth prosecuting when the government has already been made whole with the documents? Answer: it isn’t unless the new Administration is trying to kneecap a political rival.

I happened to see a replay of the Ravens game on NFL Network a couple of weeks ago. We won the game but Davis dropped numerous passes. Saying that it only hurts us when we lose is one way to evaluate players but I’m not sure the coaching staff would agree with you.

Goose claims the dispute is over obstruction, NOT over the documents themselves. But how is it any way worth arresting your former boss once you already have your documents back? Unless of course the actual intent is to either aid or impress your new boss. Hmmmm?

The problem with Davis, at least last year, is that he dropped the ball a lot in crucial situations. I’m hoping he’s gotten over that.

More nonsense. I really hope I see you in court one day. 😉

Now you really have to be kidding! If that’s the claim then literally everyone who’s ever worked for the government is guilty as hell. I guarantee they ALL have some pens and a stapler at home. Every single one of them.

Obstruction is a ridiculous charge, and I trust you know it. There was an ongoing dispute that was in essence resolved when one side used brute force to end it, at a time when the other side was knowingly not home. This PROVES that the government could have ended the dispute at literally any time, but they chose not to. If obstruction is the claim, as you say it is, then this looks for all the world like entrapment.

Yeah right. If the issue is document control, then the issue is resolved when the government got ‘their’ documents back. I guess a jury could say that Trump should pay for the cost of the raid, but that seems a bit petty and ridiculous. If the issue is that Trump honestly thought he could keep the documents then that again had now been resolved with the raid, and it should be Trump (not the government) bringing an action to get ‘his’ documents back to Mara Lago. Either way the entire issue is ridiculous. And made more so when it was discovered that virtually EVERYONE has documents after leaving office.

Come on Goose! That’s why you’re the King. You know everything and everyone else knows nothing.

Don’t be a fool. This is what the dispute is all about. Now…do Biden. Stop waffling. This entire narrative went to crap the minute Biden was found to have classified documents. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Then the real problem is NOT Trump or Biden, but our horribly lax document control system.

Biden: ABSOLUTELY not! Trump: All of the documents? Maybe. Maybe not. (That’s the essence of the dispute.) The vast, vast majority of the documents…definitely.

Did Biden?

Christians don’t ‘doom’ anyone.

It’s an excellent point and one I’ve wondered about during this entire document saga. Anyone who has documents outside of the secure location (Biden, Pence, Trump) only needs to photocopy or take a cellphone photo of them and poof….there goes the control over the document. So does it really matter if you give them back? It’s not like it’s a piece of jewelry!

I’m not sure a #1 draft pick is considered out of nowhere. BTW….are you in Hawaii?

Not trying to be sarcastic but isn’t that what they’re at least partly hoping the “untested” guys will be?

Ya see? I’m your mind nobody attacked the White House, nobody assaulted police officers, and nobody remembers the date. The DNC media machine did its job. History belongs to the ones with a keyboard and microphone.

How dare you call Joe Biden greasy! 😉

Probably, but I was educated in WNY. 😉

You’ve lost me here. I was talking about holding hearings on the attack on the White House! You’re talking about the Biden Crime Syndicate.

I’ve lost you here, but then a message board is rarely a good place for splitting legal hairs.

On this we agree. The constitution definitely doesn’t prohibit the right to use most types of birth control.

You do NOT have the right to harm other people just because you do it in private. Period!

What would the hearings be about? Is there some big dispute over what happened? No there isn’t. The J6 hearings were also about nothing and proved nothing. Im not arguing for MORE hearings. I’m arguing for LESS.

In a wet market? Now that’s crazy talk! 😉