SoCal Deek

Geez John….what I said was that the government already remedied the dispute by getting the documents back. There’s literally no need to go the extra step and indict your political rival. You cannot possibly be this partisan!

So you agree that any potential ‘security problem’ was therefore remedied when they physically retrieved the documents (as it was with Clinton, Biden, and Pence) and the discussion regarding the unique dispute can then continue by constitutional scholars. The indictment is purely political at that point.

John.. that’s exactly what this case will prove out, so long as you’re willing to wait for the outcome. In any event, indicting the former President was a ridiculous way to go about settling what even you admit is a “procedural” dispute.

This is actually a very simple dispute. Trump believes that the President has special authority when it comes to the retention of these documents. Whereas NOBODY believes, or ever has believed, that Clinton or Biden or Pence had any such authority.

I agree with much of that Frank. Many years ago I attended a conference and the keynote lunchtime speaker was a demographer. She wasn’t an expert on the subject of the conference but she explained how demographics impact so much of what we feel, consume, and trend. I’ll never forget that presentation. (Can’t remember much else from that conference.) What she also reminded everyone is that these trends sing back and forth all the time.

What if the ‘tools’ are just that…tools!

What did you want him to ask? How do you think presidents talk to each other? You are looking for something that doesn’t exist.

And you’re going to shocked to know that I don’t spend any time at all on Twitter. In fact, other than the nonsense posted on here, I’ve never been on the site. Not once.

He did NOT ask for dirt! He asked the incoming President to make sure our country hadn’t been (nor was going to be) using US taxpayer funds for the personal benefit of our elected class. I honestly can’t believe we don’t ask that in EVERY conversation with EVERY country.

I don’t know what that means but I’ll defend your right to say it. 😁

So how is he going to know if a crime was committed if he can’t even ask in a PRIVATE conversation? But no, wait, the private conversation was leaked to the PUBLIC by those opposing Trump. You don’t see the irony here? Really?

I don’t even know what qanon even is. I just use my eyes and ears to evaluate what’s going on. And apparently unlike you I no longer trust my government to do anything other than what serves their interests first, the new world order second, and the American people a far distant third.

John…give it a rest. This has gotten to be utterly ridiculous. The entire country has seen the video of Joe bragging about getting a prosecutor fired. President Trump was more than correct to ask the incoming Ukrainian president to look into what the heck that was all about.

I’m really glad to see this. I didn’t watch much if any of either of the offseason leagues but if a USFL standout isn’t going to get a chance to make an NFL roster then what’s the point?

And because you searched for that you are now being closely watched by the FBI. 😉

John also believes the recent congressional hearings were actually the impeachment trial of Joe Biden. So there’s that.

So it’s your ridiculous position that during the Presidential race the sitting president has to stop being the president. He can’t do or ask anything that would relate to a potential rival even if he knows or believes a crime has been committed? I’m sure there’s something about that in the constitution. And if he’s not supposed to ask about it personally then the right thing to do is have your FBI spy on the opposition’s campaign. No, wait!

I love that song. 👍

Ah….the Royal you. Sounds like some privileged speak right there. 😉

“We”? Do you have an empathetic outraged woke mouse in your pocket? 😉

Whereas you are a total moron.

The white girl screaming at the cops was crapped on by society? Okie Dokie

Avery good friend of mine was there. I have no idea what your point is here.

And if it was your son or daughter, you wouldn’t be asking ANYTHING about what they did for a living? Sure, that sounds plausible.

I’m going to assume that many on here have adult aged children. If so let me ask you this: Your son or daughter tells you they just got a job working for a Ukrainian Energy Company after having jumped on your plane to visit that far away, meaningless country; would your response have been to NEVER ask him/her “say what?…you got a job?…doing what exactly?”. Give me a break!