CuddyDark

He's the only one who could.

Yeah I'll stand on this side. The problem is people like you. Who told you you get to judge the world? That's the problem. People like you. People who think others need to be shown a lesson because you disagree with them. People who think someone needs to suffer because they have different opinions from your own.

His brother won the superbowl against the Falcons. They had an epic comeback. He rushed the field pushing past security. This woman is the only one "injured". I bet the real POS is this woman. I understand it well. If he paid her she'd drop the charges. He didn't so they prosecuted him.

Why, should you be in class?

The old lady. I remember that one woman guarding the Obama's got knocked out and allowed the guy who jumped the fence to enter the white house and the white house personal residence.

Absolutely. He pushed through the entire team of security. This woman said she was injured. She most likely asked for money or med bills and he said hell no. If you don't pay they press charges.

Sounds like a money grab.

I could see him going to Jags, Steelers, Saints or Pats at the end of round one. He's got a low floor as a very good backup at worse. I can see 6 QB going in round one because of backup needs and aging starters.

By the Bills or in general?

For the Bills I think Jerry Hughes has been great. I love him for us. For the Colts or the Giants with the DC they have he's not a good fit because they use an elephant position and Jerry can't hold up as a 4 or a 5 or a 6 when they switch back and forth between 3-4 and 4-3.

Pipe dream.

Or he didn't fit, they thought he was a bust and they traded him.

But that's not their scheme. We're talking about the Giants. Their DC uses a Sam/RDE who can both blitz and play 6,5, and 4 technique. That is not Jerry Hughes. It so much not Jerry Hughes that when he was being coached for that system with the same coach he was traded because he didn't fit.

Then why did they trade him? Easy he was drafted to play 43 RDE. When they went to a 3-4 they didn't like him as a fit, so they traded him.

I believe Jerry Hughes was on the team for a full year with Bettcher as has LB coach. I think there's a better chance they'd want Lawson. Lawson played the same role in college they have with Chandler Jones or with some of the other 34 sams they had there. Lawson could play right outside and move down to six technique which Hughes never could because of his size. Just look at the list they had there in Arizona, John Abraham, Lamarr Woodley, Alex Okafor, and Chandler Jones.

He failed at 3-4 OLB when the Giants DC was his LB coach.

Giants hired a 3-4 DC so trading a 4-3 end or for a 4-3 end is probably not gonna happen.

I don't disagree. But you not getting the same player at 12 unless they take Jackson and he becomes Cam or Vick or Steve Young.

If there are 7 franchise type players and you trade to 12 what are you doing really?

There is no rule against hitting a QB and his head bouncing off the turf. We disagree with him being the best player. He could be good, he could be a bust. At the end of the day the best QB have always been the best fighters. You better have a damn good team if you take Rosen.

A jerk is different than someone who might not be around for the long haul. Rosen is the toughest to invest in long term IMO. He has those issues I stated before. Plus he's built like RG3 and Brady and Matt Ryan with skinny legs. Lets say he get a knee injury, is he fighting back to play? He has a history of concussions, if he get more than a couple during his rookie contract will he retire? You're thinking like a fan. When running a business you have to think about personalities and the their long term ramifications.

It's not necessarily personality with Rosen it's like that Florida State safety who wanted to be a doctor. Rosen might not love football. He doesn't need it. His issues with personality is he might be flighty and aloof, tough to coach. It's different.

If QBs go 123 Browns will take Barkley or Chubb at 4. If we want to get back in for Allen it will be 7-10. Both are flawed. Mayfield is the only clean QB, but he's short. If Mayfield was 6'3 he's go number 1 and analyst would claim he's the best prospect since Luck.

He's really just as restrictive as Lamar Jackson. Allen depends on the system you run. If he went to the Steelers and they ran the same offense they run with Big Ben he could be good. If you try to put him in a quick passing West Coast system he might suck. He'd be good in the west coast the Packers or the Saints run. You have to let him throw deep on almost every play. You have to design an offense of deep outs and deep posts and comebacks and back shoulders. You have to understand from the day you get him he may never see underneath throws like the offense they run in NE.

Most of these boys believe the next QB will be great. This is their belief. They feel there will be a great QB who carries the team on his back even though there are only about 6 of those players in the league. They think you can remove Tyrod and everything will magically change. They're judging a middle of the road QB against Brady and it's stupid. For what he was Tyrod was a good player for the Bills. He was never supposed to be Brady unless you live in a fiction where all the QBs are great.