Jump to content

CuddyDark

Community Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,532

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by CuddyDark

  1. CuddyDark
    Our only hope is McDermott.
  2. CuddyDark
    I only added Whaley because he actually pulled off a trade up. Though he, "overpaid."
  3. CuddyDark
    So you get to tell me what I can infer?
  4. CuddyDark
    By most people you mean, you? You keep using lies. I guess it suit your narrative.
  5. CuddyDark
    They needed it to because of Trump's stance against taking a knee. This is good for the NFL. They need all the shinny **** they can get. Even the QB talk is good for them. All the trade talk. It's all good for them.
  6. CuddyDark
    We disagree. If they make a trade out of the top ten I can infer Beane **** the bed. You can disagree, that's your right.
  7. CuddyDark
    Me too, or he's weaker than I thought when I started this thread.
  8. CuddyDark
    I'm not stopping him.
  9. CuddyDark
    Very plausible and one I hope is true as well given I only believe in Mayfield and Darnold. Call it whatever you want. Colts right now are saying they're open to trading out of the top ten. So it was never about a top ten player.
  10. CuddyDark
    Neither do I.
  11. CuddyDark
    That's my point. What if Beane is a passive GM who waits?
  12. CuddyDark
    Bills fans came here dying for a QB saying they'll pay anything. Now they've settled. It's interesting. "Trust the process." Maybe it'll workout and we'll settle for whoever drops. We said we didn't want that just a couple of months ago.
  13. CuddyDark
    Sounds like it. Beane let him get to the next offer when he could have blown his socks off. That's is my entire point, don't you know?
  14. CuddyDark
    I disagree with this as I've said twice. I'm saying if they said they won't move because they want a bluechip player and now they're saying they'll move that means it was never about the blue-chip player or the "top 10."
  15. CuddyDark
    Was never angry. Point of view is not angry. People can disagree with you or have a differing view without being angry.
  16. CuddyDark
    Whaley is the reason we have 2 first, at least according to the man he made the trade with.
  17. CuddyDark
    You're speculating more then I ever did. I don't know any of this you want about Beane to be true is actually true.
  18. CuddyDark
    Or maybe he doesn't.
  19. CuddyDark
    NO. Watkins said its flat.
  20. CuddyDark
    Are you listening? I said I believe this isn't true because the Colts are saying they want to trade out of the top 10, now. It was supposed to be a funny answer.
  21. CuddyDark
    We can do nothing else at this point.
  22. CuddyDark
    How do you know? A feeling you have?
  23. CuddyDark
    That's not the point though. What if we have a passive, "wait and see GM" who gets scooped again? What if Rosen is falling and the Pats or Cards trade to 9 and the Bills don't?
  24. CuddyDark
    I hope it works out this way. But that's blind hope at this point.
  25. CuddyDark
    Nearly the same as the Bills. If they traded to 3? The 3rd QB is probably a lot better than the 5th, or sixth.
×
×
  • Create New...