Jump to content

ChiGoose

Community Member
  • Posts

    4,569
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ChiGoose

  1. Imagine if a Dem nominee said the audience went crazy at an event in which there was no audience…
  2. Boring old grandpa ranty gives low energy speech to a bunch of empty seats. SAD! https://x.com/19joho/status/1836570851707130097?s=46
  3. The uneducated break fairly heavily for Trump.
  4. Trump can start selling his shares tomorrow. Let’s just check in on DJT: https://stocks.apple.com/symbol/DJT
  5. Duran Duran is neither Duran nor Duran
  6. The BS Shredder Narrative is back again! Those ninja turtles blame everything on Shredder! They have SDS: Shredder Derangement Syndrome! When there was a crime wave in NYC caused by ninja thieves, they said it was Shredder's Foot Clan When Splinter is kidnapped and brought to the Technodrome, they said it was Shredder When Baxter Stockman's Mousers attacked, they said it was Shredder When stone warriors arrived from Dimension X and set up a weather making device, they blamed Shredder When a mutant plant attacks the city and April O'Neil is kidnapped, they blamed Shredder When a gravity-altering device affects all of NYC, they said it was Shredder When the sewers are flooded with water and creatures from the Atlantic Ocean, they blamed Shredder This Shredder HOAX is just a liberal Turtle derangement! Shredder! Shredder! Shredder! It's all a HOAX!
  7. About damn time. They should have done it earlier, but I'll take it.
  8. Every answer Trump gives on actual policy details reads like a kid giving a book report on a book he didn’t read. Bonus points for a “sir / tears in their eyes” story.
  9. Very impressive operation by Israel. Apparently the ambassador from Iran was carrying one of the pagers too. That’s gonna be a fun one to explain
  10. Yeah, the Georgia committee is totally listening to me and doing what I want it to.
  11. Your position blaming JWHO is essentially: people should not challenge blatantly unconstitutional laws because they might not like the consequences. It’s a green light to passing unconstitutional laws in the hopes SCOTUS changes the understanding of the constitution. Seems… lazy and bad. Maybe just a backwards-looking justification to always blame whoever you consider “the other”
  12. Seems like you’re not immune from “having an agenda,” trying to find anyway to make this into something else because you don’t like the conclusions the state investigative committee reached.
  13. And you know that how? You should tell the investigative committee, because it seems they missed that. Is your conclusion that it was totally cool and good for the hospital to delay the standard treatment of care for someone in her situation until it was too late because she didn’t do what you personally believe she should have done earlier?
  14. So you believe the investigative committee was wrong when it said that delaying the care likely caused the death? “Blaming the victim isn’t a good look” -Guy blaming the victim
  15. The tweet was literally just the conclusion from the state's investigative committee. Are you saying that they lied? If a hospital delays life saving care until it's too late, is that ok because it could have been prevented earlier in an alternative universe where different things happened or people took different actions?
  16. For people struggling with how the internet works: This post includes a thing called a link. Now the link takes you to the source of the claim, which is a story published by ProPublica. I get that the world is big and scary, but it's not that hard. Ask your grandkids for help if you need it.
  17. NOW That's What I Call Projection Vol. 1,654,037
  18. You could have just read the article, which included all of that information. But it's easier to just assume everything is what you want it to be.
  19. "The story should have included details that the story did actually include. I just can't read. Take that, libs!" People who push and promote these laws want everyone to believe that it's all black and white and totally simple. All abortions are elective. The laws are written clearly and in ways that allow for doctors to do normal care. They want it to be simple because if people understood the messy truth, they would oppose these laws. Of course their claims are not true. Some of them know it. Some of them are just ignorant (like the people who post about articles not including information that was in the article). A woman was suffering from a condition that required abortion treatment to resolve. The hospital delayed that treatment for 20 hours, and as a result, she died. An official state committee determined that it was this delay likely killed her. Now, instead of saying "why was there a delay?" because it might, just might, make them realize that fear of prosecution is causing such delays all across the country in states with Dobbs era abortion laws, these bad-faithed and/or ignorant actors are blaming a pill that has been documented to have been utilized 6 million times in almost a quarter century with just 32 reported deaths (information that was also in the article that apparently Tommy Eyerolls is incapable of reading). They'll blame the pill instead of the delayed treatment. So instead of realizing that they've directly put women in harm's way, they'll likely double down and advocate for policies that will only worsen the problems. They just don't care. They'll live in their fantasy world and damn anyone who is harmed or even dies because of the policies they support. Ghouls.
  20. Someone is speaking from personal experience
  21. He’s so sad and predictable.
  22. Tommy Eyerolls sticks to the script. Usual talking points, projecting about projection. Adding nothing of value to anything. A fart in the wind.
×
×
  • Create New...