ChiGoose
-
Posts
4,569 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by ChiGoose
-
-
6 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:
Awesome story bro. Now answer my question. How is it BENEFICIAL to have drag queens read to children?
It’s as beneficial as having anyone in costume read to kids. -
1 minute ago, Chef Jim said:
How is having a drag queen reading to children beneficial?
BTW clowns freaked me the ***** out.
It’s the same as having clowns read to them. It’s weird for some, fine for others.
I never liked clowns and I’m not the biggest fan of drag queens. But to say having a guy in a furry animal suit entertain kids is fine but a guy in a dress entertain kids is somehow pedophilia is just dumb.
-
Just now, aristocrat said:
so because those guys exist it makes it ok? That’s your argument? Hey these guys over there have done inappropriate ***** were allowed to do whatever we want! License to go after kids! What an argument lol. Maybe it’s you that needs to look inside yourself Jesus
Not my argument at all, but reading seems to be an issue for you, so I’ll try to keep this as simple as possible for your elementary school reading comprehension.Drag brunches, reading hours, and other kid-oriented shows are done for the benefit of the kids. They are the same as hiring clowns, Mickey Mouse, or Spider-Man to read to or entertain kids.
The only people making it sexual are the people who see a guy in a dress and immediately think of sexy things. If you see a drag performer and think of sex, that’s on you. It’s no different than seeing some guy in a Spider-Man costume and getting a *****. That’s fine! Love and let live! But don’t project your sexuality on the kids.
-
3 minutes ago, aristocrat said:
That is completely untrue. Go stroll the libs of ticktock feed and get back to me. Your statement is completely false. You cannot even begin to make a claim that what you said is in any way true.
Also, why have drag shows in schools in the first place? People in lingerie in front of kids is appropriate? Come on
“Go check out the account of someone who wants to incite violence and you’ll be convinced they are correct.”Yeah, not a great argument. Maybe go to a drag brunch sometime and see how it actually goes. It’s mostly sing a longs and balloons.
But is you’re really worried about grooming kids for sex, I can tell you all about Dennis Hastert, Jim Jordan, and Matt Gaetz.
-
4 minutes ago, aristocrat said:
See you’re proving the point. At this point in time according to you there is no saying no to that community. Just allowed to do as they please. Appropriate or inappropriate. Put drag shows paid by the government in schools..no problem and if you say that’s inappropriate you’re a bigot. At a certain point you have to have rules don’t you?
See, you’re making a strawman. I said I support the LGBT community and you made a bunch of random assumptions based on that. Maybe look inside yourself to figure out why.
As I’ve stated before, there is a difference between the drag show you would see late at night at a gay bar and a kid-friendly drag brunch. The letter is the same as having a Mickey Mouse brunch or other kids entertainment.
-
3 minutes ago, aristocrat said:
I didn’t say that what was inappropriate.Ok cool. Then we can agree that the US celebrating the LGBT community is unambiguously a good thing. Glad that this is settled.
-
2 minutes ago, aristocrat said:
it wasn’t until recently that the government was paying for drag queens to show up at schools or that the us mens soccer team changed their colors to the rainbow. They’ve injected themselves into the national conversation. Two things can be true…their community should exist but also some limits on how elements of their community are displayed. There are plenty of weird ass straight people I don’t want at my kids school. Some things are just inappropriate for kids you know?
I fail to see how acknowledging that gay people exist is inappropriate. -
1 hour ago, Doc said:
Or bakers refusing to bake cakes for LGBTQ+ people. You can thank social media for all of it.
Yes, there are plenty of social media sites and accounts that target hate at specific individuals. Like, claiming that anyone who supports LGBT rights is a pedophile groomer or by following election law, an administrator is stealing the election.
-
I think we can get lost in the minutiae and partisan attacks, but let’s just come back together and agree that Trump illegally possessed government documents.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
-
13 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:
If you're ready to listen without assuming I'm pushing ANY sort of agenda....laminated glass is not thick glass. It's made from an inner layer of virtually unbreakable "plastic" sandwiched between two layers of float (plate) glass. This makes it similar to plywood, to use a wood analog. It also means that when struck with a hammer, it tends to bend, and definitely would not shatter on the floor. The outer glass pane will break but tends to stay adhered to the plastic core. This plywood-like strength also means that you would have to strike it over and over again, very hard, to make a dent in it or bend it far enough to release it from the glazing stops (which are the trim that hold the window pane into the frame). In fact, you would probably pop the nails/screws out of the stops of what appears to be a wood paned patio door, before you would break a piece of laminated glass.
We specify laminated glass in prisons. It's not the same as tempered glass, which is what they use in your car windshield or by Code in your sliding patio door. Tempered glass breaks purposefully into pebbles so that you do not get cut by the shards if it happens to break when the door is slammed (or struck by a hammer).
I'm not saying ANYTHING about the incident, but based on the evidence, I highly doubt it was laminated glass.
Maybe more than you want to know....but there it is.
Hey @SoCal Deek, I value your opinion on this since it seems to be right up your alley. I don't know for certain if it was laminated glass, though the responding officers believed it was. Initial reports can be obviously be false as people are emotionally charged during the incident.
From what I can tell from the photos, there is broken glass both inside and outside the house but there is a large circle of glass that is shattered but still holding together. I'd honestly appreciate your thoughts on this.
Here are some different images I've found:
-
3 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:
Yes, but what’s the question? 🤷🏻♂️I'm going to need a more powerful computer to answer that...
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, Gene Frenkle said:
Maybe he thinks that life, the Universe and everything are only 6,000-ish years old, as a biblical scholar. It helps to know what you're dealing with.
Actually, the answer to life, the universe, and everything is 42.
-
1
-
-
2 hours ago, Chef Jim said:
My conspiracy theory is the Russians played both sides. They felt the could bring us down from within. If so it’s safe to say they have so far been successful. 🤷🏻♂️This is absolutely 100% true. There were several left-wing / BLM-type groups that were actually stood up by the Russian IRA.
-
11 minutes ago, Doc said:
Happens all the time unfortunately. That’s not a defense, just the facts. Being in the public eye puts a crosshair on you.Until recently, elections administrators were not in the public eye. Nor were trans people or drag queen brunches part of the discourse either.
But, it seems that some people like to demonize these people, doxx them, and then pretend surprise when violence occurs. Rinse and repeat. Continue spewing nonsense and hate while lives are ended by those listening to your message. Just make sure you keep enough of an arm's distance to be able to claim innocence even though it is very obvious what is going on.
-
1 hour ago, Doc said:
Death threats against public officials? That's something new...
It's almost as if vilifying specific people and telling the masses that they are doing horrible things helps to drive violence against them...
-
1 hour ago, Doc said:
Whose votes were changed?
I never said votes were changed. The election was not rigged. It was an influence campaign.
-
24 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:
Russia!
Never change commies.
Please never change.
23 minutes ago, Doc said:I guess there's your Russian collusion. That $25K was the key to overcoming Hilly's $1B+ campaign and hacking all those voting machines.
If you don’t believe that the Russians helped the Trump campaign and that the Trump campaign worked with Russian assets, then I don’t know what to tell you at this point because you live in an absolute fantasy world. -
Just now, Doc said:
You got him now! Now do the Clinton Foundation.
Nailed it. Those damn Clinton children stealing from kids with cancerOh wait…
-
14 minutes ago, Doc said:
Gotta love the government censoring its people and rubes lapping it up.
I don’t know what it is with this board just going straight for strawmen and failing basic reading comprehension but you all need to log off and touch some grass for a bit.
-
Oh look, words have consequences. The same conspiracies that PPP loves and always falls for also leads to threats and violence against the targets of those conspiracies.
Who could have thought?!
-
9 minutes ago, B-Man said:
This is just laying the groundwork for the rubes.
The FTC already had a consent order against Twitter and will likely enforce it if Musk violates it.
Musk is also likely violating numerous employment laws which may be enforced by regulators and/or through lawsuits by former employees.
On top of that, Musks plans for content moderation will certainly violate laws in Europe and other countries, creating more legal exposure.
All of this is obvious and readily apparent. But if he can spin it ahead of time as political persecution instead of the obvious consequences of his actions, the ignorant masses will lap it up.
-
1 hour ago, Orlando Tim said:
Ok I stand corrected, I apologize for calling you a liar.
No problem. And I think we can see how the media gets this stuff wrong too.
That’s why it is best to just go to the filings when they are available.
-
41 minutes ago, Orlando Tim said:
I have to ask- do you think she had his DNA inside her from 25 years ago I til she filed the lawsuit? Where the hell has his DNA been for 25 years?
I suppose you could try looking into it. If you had, maybe you’d learn that she saved the dress from the incident and kept it unwashed.
No idea if anything comes of it, but this isn’t hard stuff to find.
-
24 minutes ago, Orlando Tim said:
You just either lied or never read actual report before responding. The police report does not say that, and DOJ report is not what you say. The fact you say the most likely thing is the only thing that makes Pelosi not the issue says a lot about your political faith.
“10. At 2:31 a.m., San Francisco Police Department (“SFPD”) Officer Colby Wilmes responded to the Pelosi residence, California and knocked on the front door. When the door was opened, Pelosi and DEPAPE were both holding a hammer with one hand and DEPAPE had his other hand holding onto Pelosi’s forearm. Pelosi greeted the officers. The officers asked them what was going on. DEPAPE responded that everything was good. Officers then asked Pelosi and DEPAPE to drop the hammer”“DEPAPE stated that they went downstairs to the front door. The police arrived and knocked on the door, and Pelosi ran over and opened it. Pelosi grabbed onto DEPAPE’s hammer, which was in DEPAPE’s hand. At this point in the interview, DEPAPE repeated”
It literally says that the officer says the door was opened and that DePape said that Pelosi opened it.
Election Week Malfunctions, Anomalies etc...
in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Posted
I honestly do not understand what you are asking. If your asking if there are “sexy” versions of Spider-Man or clowns, I regret to inform you and my internet provider that yes, yes there are.
The question I have is: when you see guy in a dress, do you immediately think sex?