Paulus

sig·nif·i·cant siɡˈnifikənt/ adjective 1. sufficiently great or important to be worthy of attention; noteworthy. "a significant increase in sales" synonyms: notable, noteworthy, worthy of attention, remarkable, important, of importance, of consequence, signal;More 2. having a particular meaning; indicative of something. "in times of stress her dreams seemed to her especially significant" It does look like most abortion studies deem the "fetal health issues" notable. It is noted and remarkable. Please stop messaging me with stupid comments, Mr. Connotation. I really don't care. 1) I do say baby mama 2) I didn't want to bother to write gyno, as I was hungover 3) I was kidding about selling fetuses; my one child is a blond haired, blue eyed boy worth much more sold as a child than for stem cells. Please stop messaging me with stupid comments. Mr. Denotation.

Yeah, I got one. What about retarded babies? The autism/retard tests are not certain, and comes back with a probability. I'd be willing to bet that a significant number of abortions are based that, as this was what the baby doctor basically told us with regard to the autism/retard testing, when my son was still a fetus. You want to save the lives of normal healthy fetuses, then some form of infanticide may help. At least in the autism/retard abortion regard. What about harvesting fetuses for stem cells? That saves lives. Can I just knock up tinder chicks and then sell fetuses for stem cells use? Is it legal? Do you think a 50/50 is asking too much?

Then they are trading out of the #2 spot to a team that is taking a QB (the Bills).

This is correct.

I voted yes because this thread is so stupid. I do this when I get calls for polls and they ask stupid questions.

Finally figured it out? Yeah, I was joking about the cliff thing. That would be murder. Useless and unwanted infants should be given a gun (butter knife for the Eurosexuals) and left to exposure. I mean seriously, babies are so stupid and useless. Can't even walk or use a gun.

A QB is being taken in each of the first 3 picks. This thread is missing that probability.

Man, some of yall must really enjoy too much crack.

"If I had to bet." Idk, I have a feeling they are more likely than not to make the trade with the Giants. I won't be suprised if they didn't, but I think trading for the #2 has been in the works for some time.

Wait, didn't Kyle just sign an extension?

But, it is possible, right? That said, if I had to bet, I'd bet on a trade with the Giants for the #2.

The question and answer choices make no sense. Do you like dogs or cats? 1)Yes 2)No Wtf?! Also, I am pro-baby killing. The mothers should be forced to give birth before they decide that the baby is not of use. After birth, if the baby has no value, then it should be tossed off the Sparta cliff and left to exposure.

The offseason gives some posters wings!!!

Everyone has their thoughts on the Jets' trade. Apparently, many of them think they need their own thread to express it. This one is a bit more stupid than the others, IMHO.

Looks more probable, now that the Jets traded up. Looking at this whole thread is really a treat, as it shows how flip-floppy and full of **** some posters are.

Man, autocorrect... Jets*

I just think Beane didn't value the 3 puck as much as the Jets did.

I think for most people, not necessarily DR, most of these rags are trusted sources of info. The problem lies in that they constantly report on negative or positive news based on political ideology. In other words, they tell their liberal readers all the bad thing they can about conservatives and visa versa, depending on which groups the media outlets are catering to (their customer base). After a while, these outlets take thing too far by misleading people with articles, while still basing their reporting in fact. Half-truths. The rise and fall of unbiased media.

They have the same eyes and smirk. Glad a few people here get the reference.

ITT you are.

People just say stuff. Most people here just try to sound like they know what they are talking about, few actually do.

"Hot" and "would you do her" are not the same. Man, Kevin was so on point with that comment. That said, she is hot, imo.

"Top talent" in all drafts gets subjective at some point. I think 5 QBs will be taken in the first and 4 will be taken in the top 15. I agree this year's QB crop is one of the best in years and it is very likely the Bills will trade up to get one of the top 4. We can't say for sure what McBeane is thinking. Who they like and who they dont. One of the reasons I like this FO. They appear to think years ahead.

I can see it. I doubt we don't, but I can see the FO not giving up all their picks to if the QB(s) they want isn't on the board, anymore. This FO does not seem shortsighted, exempt for former Panther player acquisitions (even then it may be more about culture). And, if they think AJ can produce while wheeling and dealing for players to fill the holes, then they may just be happy with taking a QB next year. I mean, they will go after only thier guys, who may be gone, IMO.