Jump to content

OldTimeAFLGuy

Community Member
  • Posts

    24,454
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by OldTimeAFLGuy

  1. .....the light blue paper ones.....see description below from Amazon......... Disposable Face Masks - 50 PCS - For Home & Office - 3-Ply Breathable & Comfortable Filter Safety Mask by Disposable Face Masks 3.5 out of 5 stars 121 ratings | 60 answered questions List Price: $67.00 Price: $25.40 ($0.51 / Count) & FREE Shipping You Save: $41.60 (62%)
  2. ...safe to say that "Floyd The 'Roid" ain't on your Christmas list I presume........
  3. ....I missed the memo....how could the Dems think this crustacean is the face of House leadership?.....sad part is here multi-trillion dollar bill passes the House because not ONE Dem House member has the gonads to vote against her due to obvious reprisals.....our "dirty democracy" in full bloom.....we're screwed.......
  4. ..if, IF elected and with NO mental ability to serve, what is the Dem's game plan anyhow?.....I fear to ask........
  5. ...so then "Panthers Den" is a winnah?...............
  6. ...sad....especially considering your public exposure in your work....hope you're ok my friend.....
  7. ...wasn't there an alarming article about who had access to NSA/security files on ordinary US citizens as well?......
  8. ......Drought's Over Tap Room..........
  9. ....death penalty works for me.......SMH......... Fake COVID-19 tests seized by US Customs and Border Patrol in Rochester Charles Molineaux-WHEC Updated: May 05, 2020 11:09 PM Created: May 05, 2020 10:43 PM ROCHESTER, N.Y. (WHEC) — U.S. Customs and Border Patrol agents report they’ve been discovering hundreds of counterfeit tests for coronavirus being shipped through Greater Rochester International Airport, part of a broad unethical market seeking to exploit a frightened public. “They are not approved and they are attempted to be sold on the black market,” Aaron Bowker with the U.S Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) said. The CBP says its inspectors were looking over consignment shipments and found the kits. It did not specify where they had been shipped from, or their intended destinations but said the tests had not come from any of the labs approved to make COVID-19 tests. In Rochester, the CPB reports catching 600 of the counterfeit kits since March. Twenty-five of them were spotted in the latest seizure on Tuesday. https://www.whec.com/coronavirus/fake-covid-19-tests-seized-rochester/5721029/
  10. ..good Lord CB, NOT Here......Wrecks already sullied OBD with his "Barnum & Bailey Clown Show".....we don't need Scam's "fedora topped pajama pressers" taking the credit for a "W" and throwing the team under the bus for a "L"....WWE works........
  11. ...her anti-cop boss trained her well......wonder if the Native Americans would take the joint back free of charge?...hell refund them the 24 bucks............
  12. ...outlines openings by region........... New York coronavirus reopening: Which regions can start to reopen May 15? Jon Campbell, New York State Team Published 3:20 p.m. ET May 13, 2020 | Updated 4:08 p.m. ET May 14, 2020 ALBANY – Certain businesses across much of upstate New York will have the green light to reopen Friday after nearly two months of being forced to shut their doors amid the torrid spread of the coronavirus. But much of the state — including the Buffalo area, New York City and its suburbs — will have to remain shuttered, unable to meet the state's metrics to make it eligible for the first phase of reopening. New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo's office has laid out seven key metrics each region of the state must meet in order to qualify for a partial reopening on Friday, when eligible regions will be allowed to let construction, manufacturing and retail businesses resume in-person operations. Nonessential retail operations will be limited to curbside pickup, while essential retail — including grocery stores — will continue operating as normal, as they have throughout the state's stay-at-home order. Why is one region of the state allowed to open when another, nearby region isn't? https://www.democratandchronicle.com/story/news/politics/albany/2020/05/13/new-york-coronavirus-reopening-which-regions-can-start-reopen-may-15/5182327002/
  13. ...r u at least getting closer?...……….
  14. ..quick count shows at least a dozen vendors ship dates from May 16 to May 20......
  15. ...of course.....Pelosi's bill has ONE TRILLION DOLLARS in it for states......Cuomo wants 60 billion (before Covid-19, projected budget shortfall was 7 billion because of his sound fiscal management)….Grusome Newsome is 58 billion in the red....and Illinois Governor (yup, HIM) wants 41 billion which includes 10 billion for their ongoing unfunded pension liability...and what does Covid-19 have to do with that?...SMH...…….
  16. ..you can order 50 today on Amazon for $34.99 and have them by Saturday (70 cents each)...……...
  17. ...no harm keeping him around...…….. .."He signed a reserve/future contract with the Bills on 6 January 2020.[21] On 27 April 2020, Wade was given a roster exemption as an international player for a second season.."
  18. By Charlotte Butash, Hilary Hurd Friday, May 8, 2020, 4:05 PM "Under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48(a), the government may dismiss an indictment, information or complaint “with leave of the court.” And this has a lot of people wondering today whether Judge Emmet G. Sullivan might refuse to grant consent to let the case go." "Sullivan has been dealing with Flynn’s machinations in his courtroom for more than two years. Some commentators understandably regard the Justice Department’s current conduct as an unacceptable bait and switch, but precedent from the Supreme Court and U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit leaves little room for the judge presiding over the Flynn case to decline to grant the government’s motion."
  19. Judge Sullivan Disregards Two Controlling Precedents By Appointing Amicus In Flynn Case Mark ChenowethContributor-FORBES U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan disregarded two controlling precedents from higher courts with his decision to appoint John Gleeson as amicus curiae in the U.S. v. Michael Flynn case this week. Judicial conduct similar to J. Sullivan’s in these prior, far less politically charged cases was roundly and unanimously condemned by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, D.C. Circuit Judge Sri Srinivasan, and their colleagues across the ideological spectrum. So, whether or not one agrees with the Department of Justice’s call to drop its charges against President Trump’s former National Security Advisor, Gen. Michael Flynn, there should be widespread agreement that J. Sullivan has veered way out of line. One week ago, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a 9-0 decision, authored by Justice Ginsburg, that took judges to task for similar amicus antics. Her opinion for the Court in U.S. v. Sineneng-Smith upbraided the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for violating a basic aspect of legal proceedings called the “party presentation principle.” In a nutshell, this concept dictates that judges must decide the case as presented by the parties before them. They are not to go out questing for dragons to slay (or issues to tackle) that the parties have not brought before them. As J. Ginsburg put it: “[C]ourts are essentially passive instruments of government … They ‘do not, or should not, sally forth each day looking for wrongs to right. [They] wait for cases to come to [them], and when [cases arise, courts] normally decide only questions presented by the parties.” https://www.forbes.com/sites/markchenoweth/2020/05/14/judge-sullivan-disregards-two-controlling-precedents-by-appointing-amicus-in-flynn-case/#257502de6f0a
  20. ...well he did sniff Barbara's hair right?...she's a Boxer..........
×
×
  • Create New...